Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Methodology for the Ship System Integration with Open Architecture : Focusing on the Total Ship Computing Environment based Architecture Building and Validation

개방형 구조(OA)를 이용한 함정체계통합 구축 방법론 : 통합함정컴퓨팅환경(TSCE)기반 아키텍처 구축 및 검증을 중심으로

  • Received : 2020.08.06
  • Accepted : 2020.09.26
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In a series of recent launch tests, North Korea has been improving the firepower of its missiles that can target South Korea. North Korea's missiles and submarines are capable of threatening targets in South Korea and are likely faster and more covert than the systems previously seen in North Korea. The advanced threats require that ROK Navy should not only detect them earlier than ever but also response quicker than ever. In addition to increasing threats, the number of young man that can be enlisted for military service has been dramatically decreasing. To deal with these difficulty, ROK navy has been making various efforts to acquire a SMART warship having enhanced defense capability with fewer human resources. For quick response time with fewer operators, ROK Navy should improve the efficiency of systems and control tower mounted on the ship by promoting the Ship System Integration. Total Ship Computing Environment (TSCE) is a method of providing single computing environment for all ship systems. Though several years have passed since the first proposal of TSCE, limited information has been provided and domestic research on the TSCE is still in its infancy. In this paper, we apply TSCE with open architecture (OA) to solve the problems that ROK Navy is facing in order to meet the requirements for the SMART ship. We first review the level of Ship System Integration of both domestic and foreign ships. Then, based on analyses of integration demands for SMART warship, we apply real time OA to design architecture for TSCE from functional view and physical view. Simulation result shows that the proposed architecture has faster response time than the response time of the existing architecture and satisfies its design requirements.

Keywords

References

  1. Brian, S., LCS program update, NAVSEA Cybersecurity Industry Day, 2015.
  2. Dick, C., Integration of Software Safety into the System Engineering Process-DDG 1000, A Case Study, 2015.
  3. Hur, J.-H., Moon, J.-I., Choi, B.-W., Oh, H.-S., and Yim, D.-S., A Study for effective methodology of the search pattern of AUV, Journal of KIMST, 2014, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 751-763.
  4. Hwang, I.-H., Direction of ship shape development for reduced operation personnel, Journal of the, Defense Science and Technology Information, 2015, Vol. 50, pp. 6-24.
  5. Hwang, K.-Y., A study on SE-based design methodology for next-generation naval combat system architecture, Hanam University, 2017.
  6. Jung, S.-H., Ji, H.-G., Choi, S.-U., Jung, N.-S., and Im, J.-K., Direction of development for ship system integration, Bulletine of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 2020, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 15-20. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2020.57.1.015
  7. Jung, Y.-T., Jeong, B.-J., Choi, B.-W., and Yim, D.-S., A methodology for analyzing effects of the cooperative engagement capability system applied to naval operations, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2019, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 95-105.
  8. Kevin, S., DDG-1000 Overview : Mission system technologies, ASNE Day 2014, 2014, pp. 8-9.
  9. Kim, J.-S., An, J.-S., Kim, Y.-J., and Lee, S.-U., Development trend of Architecture and Technology for Nextgeneration US Naval Combat System (I), Defense Science and Technology, 2014, Vol. 210, pp. 1-9.
  10. Kim, J.-S., An, J.-S., Kim, Y.-J., and Lee, S.-U., Development trend of Architecture and Technology for Nextgeneration US Naval Combat System(II), Defense Science and Technology, 2015, Vol. 211, pp. 1-9.
  11. Kim, Y.-J., Oh, H.-S., and Choi, B.-W., A study of reliability analysis and application on naval combat system using field critical failure data, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2016, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 49-59. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2016.39.4.049
  12. Lee, S.-U., Kim, Y.-J., and Ha, T.-Y., Development trend and domestic development of TSCE, Defense and Technology, 2015, Vol. 434, pp. 62-77.
  13. Mark, H., Michael, L., and Jeffery, T., DDG-1000 Engineering Control System(ECS), ASNE Intelligent Ship VIII Symposium, 2009.
  14. National interest.org., Why the US Navy's Littoral Ship punch below, 2018.
  15. Navy Education and Training Command, Combat System A to Z, 2016.
  16. Navy Headquarters, A Study on TSCE-based Methodology for Ship System Integration, 2019.
  17. Navy Headquarters, Regulation For Naval Ship System Integration, 2019.
  18. NPS LCS Teaml, Systems Engineering Capstone report, Littoral Combat Ship Open Ocean Anti-Submarine Warfare, 2014.
  19. Oh, S.-W., An integrated architecture for control and monitoring system on naval surface combatants, Journal of the KIMST, 2018, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 103-114.
  20. Park, G.-S., Park, H.-J., and Choi, B.-W., Study on the ship system integration in the basis of total ship computing environment, Naval Ship Technology and Weapon Systems Seminar Proceeding, 2019.