Communications of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

High School Students' Mathematics Learning Style and Its Characteristics According to Their MBTI Personality Disposition Types

고등학생들의 수학 학습양식과 MBTI 성격기질별 특징

  • Received : 2020.06.12
  • Accepted : 2020.09.16
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify high school students' mathematics learning style and its characteristics according to their personality disposition types and to propose mathematics learning strategies fit into each personality disposition type. For this purpose, MBTI personality test and survey to find mathematics learning style for 375 high school students were executed. The results were as follows. First, many students highly evaluated the effects of private education and prefer reference book to textbook. Second, there were significant differences on following variable domains of mathematics learning style such as learning attitude, learning habit(concentrativeness to concept understanding), problem solving strategies(effort for problem comprehension, use of various strategies), self management(metacognition) by MBTI personality disposition types(SJ, SP, NT, NF groups). Third, based on the results, the following mathematics learning strategies fit into each personality disposition type were recommended. SJ type students are needed to effort creative approach for open problem and to use mindmap as mathematics learning strategy. SP type students are needed to fulfill stepwise problem solving process and to effort constantly practice long/short term learning objectives. NT type students are needed to expand opportunity to study with friends and to use SRN(self reflection note) or mathematics journal writings as mathematics learning strategy. NF type students are needed to use mathematics learning note writing activity which include logical basis for each step of problem solving and to invest more time on learning algebra which need meticulous calculation.

본 연구에서는 고등학생들의 수학 학습양식, 성격기질별 특징을 확인하고 각 성격기질별로 수학학습 전략을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위해, 375명의 고등학교 1학년 학생들을 대상으로 MBTI 성격유형 검사, 수학학습 선호도 조사를 실시하여 그 결과를 분석하였다. 이 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 많은 학생들이 사교육의 효과를 높게 평가하고 교과서보다는 참고서를 활용한 수학학습을 더 선호하였다. 둘째, 학습 태도, 학습 습관(개념이해 집중도), 문제해결 전략(문제이해 노력, 다양한 전략 사용), 자기 관리(메타인지) 영역에서 성격기질에 따라 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 확인되었다. 셋째, SJ형 학생들은 마인드맵 등의 학습 전략, SP형 학생들은 장,단기 학습목표를 꾸준히 실천하는 전략이 필요하다. NT형 학생들은 SRN(자기성찰노트)이나 수학일지를 활용한 학습 전략, NF형 학생들은 논리적 근거를 제시하는 수학학습 노트 쓰기 활동과 대수 학습에 더 많은 시간 투자가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ko, Y. N. (2013). Learning Style and Education, Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  2. Ko, H. K., Yang, K. S. & Lee, H. C. (2015). Development of the Diagnostic Worksheet for Mathematics Academic Counseling, Communications of Mathematical Education, 29(4), 723-743. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2015.29.4.723
  3. Ministry of Education (2015a), The 2015 Curriculum Promotional Brochure.
  4. Ministry of Education (2015b), The 2015 Revised Curriculum, Ministry of Education Notice No. 2015-74.
  5. Kee, C. Y. (1997). The Effects of Learning Style and Instruction Style Preference on Middle School Student's Academic Achievement, Master's thesis, Chonnam National University.
  6. Kim, K. S. (1994). The Effect of Competitive and Cooperative Teaching Methods on Academic Achievement and Learning Attitudes, Master's thesis, Jeonbuk National University.
  7. Kim, N. H. (1997). Didactical Analysis of Variable Concept and Search for the Direction of its Learning-Teaching, Doctorate thesis, Seoul National University.
  8. Kim, E. J. (2000). A Study of the Relationship between Types and Elements of Learning Styles and Curriculum, Doctorate thesis, Yonsei University.
  9. Kim, J. R. (2005). A Study on The Relationships between High School Students' Personality Types and Their Preferences of learning Strategies : Focused on Their MBTI Personality Types, Master's thesis, Hannam University.
  10. Kim, J. C. (2006). Types de personnalite de lyceens et leurs preferences des strategies d'apprentissage : une application de la grille de MBTI(Myers-Briggs Type Indicator)eclairee par celle de Keirsey, Societe Coreenne d' Enseignement de Langue et Litterature Francaises, 23, 53-80.
  11. Kim, H. S. (2001). Study on Relationship Among Personality Types, Self-Regulated Learning Abilities and Scholastic Achievements, Master's thesis, Daegu University.
  12. Kim, H. J. (2010). The Analysis of Mathematical Communication Ability according to Personal Temperament Learning Types, Master's thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  13. Doopedia (2019). http://www.doopedia.co.kr/doopedia/index.do.
  14. Park, S. H. (1998). A Study on Comparison of the Learner-Instructor Interaction and the Achievement According to Learning Style in the Web-Based Training, Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.
  15. Park, J. Y. (2004). A Study on the School Adjustment and Academic Achievement to Personality Type of Children, Master's thesis, Dong-A University.
  16. Baek, Y. J. (2005). Research on the Correlation of the Type of Studying Personality of Junior High School Students and the Level of Achievement for Each Math Domain, Master's thesis, Keimyung University.
  17. Baek, H. S. (2009). A Study on the Constituents of Math Learning Styles and the Categorization of Math Learners, Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.
  18. Seo, M. O. (2004). The Study of the Learning Styles Based on an Undergraduate's Genders and Major, the Relationships between the Learning Styles and Big Five, The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 18(4), 65-82.
  19. Seo, Y. K. (2003). The Effect of Learner's Types on Academic Achievement : Mediated by Learning Strategies, Master's thesis, Yonsei University.
  20. Shin, M. H., Kang, S. Y., Kim, E. K., Kim, J. M., Noh, W. K. & Seo, E. H. (2014). Educational Psychology(the third edition), Seoul: Hakjisa.
  21. Sim, S. Y. (2004). The Relationship between Personality Types and Mathematical Achievement of Elementary School Students, Master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education.
  22. Yang, E. G. & Whang, W. H. (2005). Relationships between Mathematical Learning Styles and the Selection of Mathematical Problem Solving Strategies : Focused on the 1st Grade High School Students, The Mathematical Education, 44(4), 565-586.
  23. Yeonwoo Psychological Development Institute. http://www.iyonwoo.com/.
  24. Oh, Y. S. (2008). The Influence of the Grouping Method by Personality Types on Mathematical Attitude and Achievement in Small Group Cooperative Learning, Master's thesis, Chuncheon National University of Education.
  25. Lee, D. W., Ko, H. K. & Yoo, M. H. (2012). Math Teaching Method and Classroom Environment Preferred by Gifted High School Students, Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.1.023
  26. Lee, S. Y. (1997). A Study on the Differences in Learning Types between Groups of Elementary, Middle, High School and University Students, Master's thesis, Seoul National University.
  27. Lee, Y. S. (1995). The Relationship between Personality Types, Learning Syle and Academic Achievement, Master's thesis, Seoul Women's University.
  28. Lee, E. J. (2003). The Effect of Personality Type on Strategy Use and English Achievement Level, Master's thesis, Gyeongsang National University.
  29. Internet personality type test. https://www.16personalities.com/ko
  30. Im, C. J. (1994). Identification and Investigation of Home Environment Process Variables That Have Influences on Learning Styles, Doctorate thesis, Sejong University.
  31. Jang, K. M. (2003). The Relationships among Self Efficacy, Learning Style and Academic Achievement of Elementary School Students, Master's thesis, Chuncheon National University of Education.
  32. Jun, W. T. (2011). Study on the preference of geographical learning activities according to MBTI personality types, Master's thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  33. Jung, Y. H. (2018). An Examination of Longitudinal SEM of Classroom Learning Environment, Self-efficacy, and Mathematics Achievement, Doctorate thesis, Sookmyung Womans's University.
  34. Ha, T. S. (2002). A Study on the Effects of High School Students' Personality Types on Their Preferences of Learning Strategies : Focused on Their MBTI Personality Types, Master's thesis, Yonsei University.
  35. MBTI Research Institute of Korea. http://www.mbti.co.kr/.
  36. Han, Y. Y. (2003). The effect of Big 5 Personality Factor and Self-regulated Learning Strategies on the Academic Achievement, Master's thesis, Sookmyung Women's University.
  37. Hyun, I. S. (1997). Relationship between Personality Types, Aptitude and Academic Achievement of Elementary School Students, Master's thesis, Sogang University.
  38. Amabile, T. M., & Hennessey, B. A. (1992). The motivation for creativity in children. In A. K. Boggiano & T. S. Pittman(Eds.), Achievement and motivation: A social developmental perspective, (pp. 54-76). New York: Cambridge University Press
  39. Cano-Garcia, F., & Hughes, E. H. (2000). Learning and Thinking Styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement, Educational Psychology, 20(4), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/713663755
  40. Ennis C. D., & Chepyator-Thomson J. R. (1990). Learning characteristics of field dependent children within an analytical concept-based curriculum, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 10, 170-187.
  41. Fairhurs, A. M., & Fairhurst, L. L. (2007). 효과적 교수, 효과적 학습 (심혜숙 역), 서울: 한국심리검사연구소. (원저 1995년 출판)
  42. Horwitz, R. A. (1979). Psychological Effects of the "Open Classroom", Review of Educational Research, 49(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049001071
  43. Lawrence, G. (2000). 성격유형과 학습스타일 (이정희, 심혜숙, 신영규, 김종구, 심민보 역), 서울: 한국심리검사연구소. (원저 1997년 출판)
  44. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, Reston, VA: NCTM.
  45. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: Classic Definition and New Direction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  46. TIMSS International Study Center(2016), TIMSS 2015 and TIMSS Advanced 2015 International Results.