Communications of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis Study on the Consistency of the Curriculum of Mathematics and Textbooks

수학과 교육과정과 고등학교 <경제수학> 교과서의 일관성 분석 연구

  • Suh, Bo Euk (Department of Mathematics Education, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2020.04.22
  • Accepted : 2020.06.10
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is an analytical study on textbooks of , which was first presented in the 2015 revised high school mathematics curriculum. The textbook has a very high educational significance in that it is the first textbook developed for students majoring in economics. Analyzing whether these textbooks faithfully follow the spirit of the curriculum is an essential study for nurturing creative and convergent human beings and for personal self-realization. Therefore, in this study, a consistency analysis was conducted to determine whether the textbook fits the textbook development direction suggested by the curriculum developer and is appropriate for the state-approved mathematics curriculum. As a result of analysis, the contents of the textbook did not partially meet these criteria and lacked consistency. In conclusion, it is necessary to prepare more thorough standards for the examination and recognition of high school elective courses in the future.

본 연구는 2015 개정 교육과정에서 처음으로 고시한 <경제수학> 과목의 교과서에 대한 분석 연구이다. <경제수학> 교과서는 상경계열을 지원하는 학생을 위해 개발된 최초의 교과서라는 면에서 교육적 의의가 매우 높다. 이에 본 연구에서는 <경제수학> 교과서가 교육과정 개발자가 제시하고 교과서 인정 기관에서 구체화한 교과서 편찬상의 유의점과 일관성이 있는지 분석하고, 국가에서 고시한 수학과 교육과정과 일관성이 있는지 분석한다. 본 연구에서의 일관성에 대한 분석 결과 <경제수학> 교과서의 내용은 부분적으로 일관성이 있지만, 그렇지 않은 부분도 다수 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과로 볼 때, 향후 고등학교 선택과목의 검·인정에 있어 보다 철저한 기준 마련과 일관성을 유지하기 위한 구체적인 기준의 제시가 요구된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011). 2009 Reformed Mathematics Curriculum, Seoul: MEST.
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology & Busan Metropolitan City Office of Education(2009). Educational curriculum and operations in world countries (II) - Japan -. Curriculum Resources -437.
  3. The Ministry of Education (2015). 7 th Mathematics curriculum, Seoul: ME.
  4. The Ministry of Education (2019). Press release of 'the ministry of education', Saejong: ME.
  5. The Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 Reformed Mathematics curriculum, Saejong: ME.
  6. Ministry Of Education &Human Resources Development (2007). 2007 Reformed Mathematics curriculum, Seoul: MEHRD..
  7. National Institute of Standards and Standards Dictionary search. https://stdict.korean.go.kr/main/main.do. 2020.02.05.
  8. Kim, W. K., Cho, M. S., Bang, J. S., Yoon, J. K., Shin, J. H., Lim, S. H., Kim, D. H., Kang, S. J., Kim K. T., Park, H. J., Shim, J. S., Oh, H. J., Lee, D. G., Lee, S. J., & Jung J. H. (2019). Math, Math I, Math II, Calculus. Seoul: Bi-Sang education.
  9. Park, K. M. & 41 others (2015). A Study on the development of revised curriculum in the Mathematics Department of. Research Report of Korea Science Foundation.
  10. Park, K. M., Kwon, O. N., Park, S. H., Park, M. G., Phen, H. H., Kang, E. J., Suh, B. E., Lee. H. C., Kim, D. W., & Kim. S. H. (2014). A research on humanities and nature integrated mathematics curriculum restructuring, Seoul: ME.
  11. Park, J. H., Kim, G. Y. (2019). High-school students' understanding and use of mathematics textbooks, The Mathematical Education, 58(4), 589-607. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2019.58.4.589
  12. Suh, B. E., Kim, N. K., Do, J. H., Park, Y. B., Kim, K. T., Park, Y. K., & Choi, I.Y (2018). A Study on the Transition of Mathematics Curriculum. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation Research Report
  13. Song, M. Y., Lim, H. M., Choi, H. J., & Park, H. Y. (2013). OECD International Academic Achievement Assessment Study: PISA 2012 Outcome Report. Korea Research Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report RRE-2013-6-1.
  14. Choi, W., Kim, S. Y., Seol, H. K., & Jeon, D. B (2018) Economic Mathematics, Gwangju: Gwangju Metropolitan Office of Education
  15. Kofac (2017). Announcement of the decision to pass the 2017 Mathematics Science Textbook Examination according to the 2015 revised curriculum, Kofac announcement No. 2017-68.
  16. Kofac (2018). Announcement of the decision to pass the 2017 Mathematics Science Textbook Examination according to the 2015 revised curriculum, Kofac announcement No. 2018-74.