East Asian Economic Review

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (대외경제정책연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Adverse Social Welfare Effect of Quadruply Gainful Trade

  • Received : 2020.06.29
  • Accepted : 2020.08.28
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Acknowledging that individuals dislike having low relative income renders trade less attractive when seen as a technology that integrates two economies by merging separate social spheres into one. We define a "trembling trade" as a situation in which gains from trade are less than losses in relative income, with the result that global social welfare is reduced. We show that a "trembling trade" can arise even when trade is more gainful in four ways: through trade the absolute income of everyone increases, the income gap in both economies is reduced, as is the income gap between the trading economies. However, trade brings populations, economies, or markets that were not previously connected closer together in social space. As a consequence, separate social spheres merge, and people's social space and their comparators are altered. Assuming that people like high (absolute) income and dislike low relative income, the aggregate increase in unhappiness caused by the trade-induced escalation in relative deprivation can result in a negative overall impact of trade on (utilitarian-measured) social welfare, if the absolute income gains are not large enough to mitigate the relative income losses.

Keywords

References

  1. Amiti, M. and J. Konings. 2007. "Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia," American Economic Review, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 1611-1638. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.5.1611
  2. Antras, P., de Gortari, A. and O. Itskhoki. 2017. "Globalization, Inequality and Welfare," Journal of International Economics, vol. 108, pp. 387-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.07.009
  3. Barro, R. J. 2000. "Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries," Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009850119329
  4. Beckfield, J. 2009. "Remapping Inequality in Europe: The Net Effect of Regional Integration on Total Income Inequality in the European Union," International Journal of Comparative Sociology, vol. 50, nos. 5-6, pp. 486-509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715209339282
  5. Berman, E., Bound, J. and S. Machin. 1998. "Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 1245-1279. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555892
  6. Bernhofen, D. and J. Brown. 2005. "An Empirical Assessment of the Comparative Advantage Gains from Trade: Evidence from Japan," American Economic Review, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 208-225. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828491
  7. Burgoon, B. 2013. "Inequality and Anti-Globalization Backlash by Political Parties," European Union Politics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 408-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512467546
  8. Burstein, A. and J. Vogel. 2011. Factor Prices and International Trade: A Unifying Perspective. NBER Working Paper, no. 16904.
  9. Calderon, C. and A. Chong. 2001. "External Sector and Income Inequality in Interdependent Economies Using a Dynamic Panel Data Approach," Economics Letters, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 225-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00374-3
  10. Etkes, H. and A. Zimring. 2015. "When Trade Stops: Lessons from the Gaza Blockade 2007-2010," Journal of International Economics, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.10.005
  11. Feenstra, R. C. and G. H. Gordon. 1997. "Foreign Direct Investment and Relative Wages: Evidence from Mexico's Maquiladoras," Journal of International Economics, vol. 42, nos. 3-4, pp. 371-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(96)01475-4
  12. Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K., Pavcnik, N. and P. Topalova. 2010. "Imported Intermediate Inputs and Domestic Product Growth: Evidence from India," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 1727-1767. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1727
  13. Goldberg, P. K. and N. Pavcnik. 2007. "Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries," Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 39-82. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.45.1.39
  14. Golub, S. S. and C.-T. Hsieh. 2000. "Classical Ricardian Theory of Comparative Advantage Revisited," Review of International Economics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9396.00217
  15. Grossman, G. M. and E. Rossi-Hansberg. 2008. "Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring," American Economic Review, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 1978-1997. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.5.1978
  16. Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., and S. R. Yeaple. 2004. "Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms," American Economic Review, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 300-316. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282804322970814
  17. Irwin, D. A. 2005. "The Welfare Cost of Autarky: Evidence from the Jeffersonian Trade Embargo, 1807-09," Review of International Economics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2005.00527.x
  18. Lundberg, M. and L. Squire. 2003. "The Simultaneous Evolution of Growth and Inequality," Economic Journal, vol. 113, no. 487, pp. 326-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00127
  19. MacDougall, G. D. A. 1951. "British and American Exports: A Study Suggested by the Theory of Comparative Costs. Part I," Economic Journal, vol. 61, no. 244, pp. 697-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/2226976
  20. MacDougall, G. D. A. 1952. "British and American exports: A Study Suggested by the Theory of Comparative Costs. Part II," Economic Journal, vol. 62, no. 247, pp. 487-521. https://doi.org/10.2307/2226897
  21. Marktanner, M. and N. Sayour. 2009. "Does Initial Inequality Prevent Trade Development? A Political-Economy Approach," Trade and Development Review, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 93-105.
  22. Melitz, M. J. 2003. "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity," Econometrica, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1695-1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
  23. Nguyen, Q. 2015. "Mind the Gap": Inequality Aversion and Mass Support for Protectionism. NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper, no. 2015/19.
  24. Ohlin, B. 1933. Interregional and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  25. Pasadilla, G. M. and C. M. M. Liao. 2005. "Who Are Opposed to Free Trade in the Philippines?" Philippine Journal of Development, vol. 32. no. 1, pp. 1-17.
  26. Ricardo, D. 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: John Murray, Albemarle-Street.
  27. Sampson, T. 2014. "Selection into Trade and Wage Inequality," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 157-202. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.6.3.157
  28. Scheve, K. and M. J. Matthew. 2006. "Public Opinion, International Economic Integration, and the Welfare State," In Bardhan, P., Bowles, S. and M. Wallerstein. (eds.) Globalization and Egalitarian Redistribution. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 217-260.
  29. Stark, O. 2013. "Stressful Integration," European Economic Review, vol. 63, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.04.008
  30. Stark, O. and J. Wlodarczyk. 2015. "European Monetary Integration and Aggregate Relative Deprivation: The Dull Side of the Shiny Euro," Economics and Politics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12059
  31. Stark, O., Zawojska, E., Kohler, W. and K. Szczygielski. 2018. "An Adverse Social Welfare Effect of A Doubly Gainful Trade," Journal of Development Economics, vol. 135, pp. 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.03.004
  32. Stolper, W. and P. A. Samuelson. 1941. "Protection and Real Wages," Review of Economic Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 58-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967638