The Journal of Information Systems (한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구)

Korea Association of Information Systems (한국정보시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of Product Development Competence and IT Competence on NPD Performance through Convergence Capabilities

기업의 제품개발역량과 IT역량이 융합능력을 통해 신제품 개발 성과에 미치는 영향

  • 최상민 (POSTECH R&D전략정책연구소) ;
  • 문태수 (동국대학교 상경대학 경영학부)
  • Received : 2020.09.06
  • Accepted : 2020.09.25
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the influence of product development competence and IT competence on new product development (NPD) performance in the context of Korean companies. To achieve this goal, this study presents and empirically tests a model of how NPD competence and IT competence can be exploited to positively influence NPD performance through convergence capabilities. Design/methodology/approach The NPD competence are based on the research construct developed by Zhang et al. (2013). IT competence is based on the research construct developed by Lu and Ramamurthy(2011) and the NPD performance are based on the performance construct developed by Sivadas and Dwyer (2000). To complete the investigation, we conducted a survey from Korean 1000 big companies, which enrolled in Korean stock market. Randomly contacted 171 Korean companies, including firms of all sizes and types. To test our hypotheses, structured equation model (SEM) with partial least squares (PLS) method was employed. Findings The findings indicate that NPD competence and IT competence are antecedent to convergence capabilities, while IT competence is higher influence than NPD competence. Also, convergence capabilities has very significant relationship with NPD performance. This study provides a better understanding of the relationship between NPD competence, IT competence, convergence capabilities, and NPD performance. So companies should focus on improving NPD and IT competence on NPD performance through convergence capabilities.

Keywords

References

  1. 강성배, 문태수, "공급사슬 동적능력을 통한 정보기술 역량이 공급사슬 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구", 경영학연구, 제43권, 제1호, 2014, pp. 245-272.
  2. 강현정, "정보시스템 분석 수준 별 역동적 역량에 기반한 효율적 사용에 관한 연구 리뷰", 정보시스템연구, 제29권, 제2호, pp. 27-50.
  3. 이남경, 유승호, 정다운, "내부 공급사슬 통합 및 외부 공급사슬 통합과 신제품 개발 성과와의 관계", 한국생산관리학회지, 제30권, 제3호, 2019, pp. 327-343. https://doi.org/10.21131/KOPOMS.30.3.201908.327
  4. 이동현, "전략 이론에서 동태적 능력에 대한 분석적 고찰", 경영학연구, 제35권, 제6호, 2006, pp. 1913-1937.
  5. 조연성, "자원, 동적역량이 경쟁우위에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 무역학회지, 제35권, 제5호, 2010, pp. 275-301.
  6. 최상민, "전략적 연계와 자원역량이 동적융합 능력을 통한 조직성과에 미치는 영향", 동국대 박사학위논문, 2015.
  7. 최상민, 문태수 "ICT역량이 융합성과에 미치는 영향, 그리고 융합능력의 매개효과분석", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 제15권, 제1호, 2015, pp. 159-175.
  8. 최종민, "정보기술을 이용한 공급기업과의 공동혁신이 제조기업 제품 및 과정 혁신에 미치는 영향", 정보시스템연구, 제27권, 제1호, 2018, pp. 111-131.
  9. Ambrosini, V. and Bowman, C., "What are Dynamic Capabilities and They are a Usefil Construct in Strategic Management?," International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2009, pp. 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x
  10. Atuahene-Gima, K., "Resolving the Capability-Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69, 2005, pp. 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.61
  11. Augier, M. and Teece, D. J., "Dynamic Capabilities and Multinational Enterprise : Penrosean Insights and Omissions," Management International Review, Vol. 47, 2007, pp. 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-007-0010-8
  12. Barney, J.B., "Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage," Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1991, pp. 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  13. Barreto, I., "Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future," Journal of Management, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2010, pp.256-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350776
  14. Bharadwaj, A.S., "A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 1, 2000, pp.169-196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
  15. Chan, Y.E., Sabherwal, R. and Thatcher, J. B. "Antecedents and Outcomes of Strategic IS Alignment: An Empirical Investigation", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2006, pp. 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2005.861804
  16. Clemons, E.K., "Information System for Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Information & Management, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1986, pp.131-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(86)90010-8
  17. Coyne K. P., Hall J. D. and Patricia G. C., "Is Your Core Competence a Mirage?", The McKinsey Quarterly, No. 1, 1997, pp. 41-54.
  18. Dhillon, G. and Lee, J., "Value Assessment of IS/IT Service Provision within Organizations," In Proceedings of the Twenty first International Conference on Information Systems, 2000, pp. 647-651.
  19. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J. A., "Dynamic Capabilities : What are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 10, 2000, pp. 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  20. Grant, R. M., "The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage Implications for Strategy Formulation," California Management Review, Vol.33, No.3, 1991, pp. 114-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664
  21. Kim, G. M., Shin, B. S., Kim, K. K. and Lee, H. G., "IT Capabilities, Process-Oriented Dynamic Capabilities, and Firm Financial Performance," Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 12, Issue. 7, 2011, pp. 487-517. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00270
  22. Lu Ying and Ramamurthy, K., "Understanding the Link between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility : An Empirical Examination," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2011, pp. 931-954. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409967
  23. Menor, L. J. and Roth, A. V., "New Service Development Competence and Performance: An Empirical Investigation in Retail Banking," Production and Operations Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2008, pp. 267-284. https://doi.org/10.3401/poms.1080.0034
  24. Pavlou, P. A. and El Sawy, O. A., "Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities," Decision Sciences, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2011, pp. 239-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00287.x
  25. Penrose, E.T., The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Wiley, New York, 1959.
  26. Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, C., "The Core Competence of the Corporation," Harvard Business Review, May-June, 1990, pp.79-91.
  27. Ray, G., Barney, J. B. and Muhanna, W. A., "Capabilities, Business Processes, and Competitive Advantage: Choosing the Dependent Variable in Empirical Tests of the Resource-based View," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, 2004, pp. 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.366
  28. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A. and Grover, V., "Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2003, pp. 237-263. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036530
  29. Sivadas, E. and Dwyer, F, R., "An Examination of Organizational Factor Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64, 2000, pp. 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.1.31.17985
  30. Tanriverdi H., "Performance Effects of Information Technology Synergies in Multibusiness Firms," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2006, pp. 57-77. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148717
  31. Teece, D. J., "Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (sustainable) Enterprise Performance," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 8, 2007, pp. 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  32. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A., "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, 1997, pp. 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  33. Tippins, M.J. and Sohi, R.S., "IT Competency and Firm Performance: IS Organizational Learning a Missing Link?," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, 2003, pp. 745-761. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.337
  34. Torkkeli, M. and Tuominen, M., "The Contribution of Technology Selection to Core Competencies," International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 77, 2002, pp. 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00227-4
  35. Wade, M. and Hulland, J., "The Resource-Based view and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestion for Future Research," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2004, pp. 107-142. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148626
  36. Weill, P.D., and Olson, M. H., "An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 6, No.1, 1989, pp. 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1989.11517849
  37. Wernerfelt, B., "A Resource-Based View of the Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1984, pp. 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  38. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G. and Oppen, C., "Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models : Guidelines and Empirical Illustration," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2009, pp. 177-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
  39. Wu, L., "Applicability of Resource-based and Dynamic-Capability View under Environment Volatility," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2010, pp. 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.007
  40. Zhang, J. A., Garrett-Jones, S. and Szeto, R., "Innovation Capability and Market Performance : The Moderating Effect of Industry Dynamism," International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2013, pp. 1-35.