Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative evaluation of the bond strength of self-adhering and bulk-fill flowable composites to MTA Plus, Dycal, Biodentine, and TheraCal: an in vitro study

  • Raina, Aakrati (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rama Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre) ;
  • Sawhny, Asheesh (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rama Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre) ;
  • Paul, Saurav (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rama Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre) ;
  • Nandamuri, Sridevi (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rama Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre)
  • Received : 2019.05.01
  • Accepted : 2019.11.05
  • Published : 2020.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of a self-adhering flowable composite (Dyad Flow) and a bulk-fill flowable composite (Smart Dentin Replacement [SDR]) to several pulp-capping materials, including MTA Plus, Dycal, Biodentine, and TheraCal. Materials and Methods: Eighty acrylic blocks with 2-mm-deep central holes that were 4 mm in diameter were prepared and divided into 2 groups (n = 40 each) according to the composite used (Dyad Flow or SDR). They were further divided into 4 sub-groups (n = 10 each) according to the pulp-capping agent used. SBS was tested using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: A statistically significant difference (p = 0.040) was found between Dyad Flow and SDR in terms of bond strength to MTA Plus, Dycal, Biodentine, and TheraCal. Conclusions: Among the 8 sub-groups, the combination of TheraCal and SDR exhibited the highest SBS.

Keywords

References

  1. Ghoddusi J, Forghani M, Parisay I. New approaches in vital pulp therapy in permanent teeth. Iran Endod J 2014;9:15-22.
  2. Gandolfi MG, Siboni F, Botero T, Bossu M, Riccitiello F, Prati C. Calcium silicate and calcium hydroxide materials for pulp capping: biointeractivity, porosity, solubility and bioactivity of current formulations. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2015;13:43-60.
  3. Gandolfi MG, Siboni F, Primus CM, Prati C. Ion release, porosity, solubility, and bioactivity of MTA Plus tricalcium silicate. J Endod 2014;40:1632-1637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.025
  4. Altunsoy M, Tanriver M, Ok E, Kucukyilmaz E. Shear bond strength of a self-adhering flowable composite and a flowable base composite to mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium-enriched mixture cement, and Biodentine. J Endod 2015;41:1691-1695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.013
  5. Arandi NZ, Rabi T. TheraCal LC: from biochemical and bioactive properties to clinical applications. Int J Dent 2018;2018:3484653. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3484653
  6. Cantekin K, Avci S. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement ($Biodentine^{(R)}$). J Appl Oral Sci 2014;22:302-306. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130660
  7. Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:227-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0702-8
  8. Serin BA, Dogan MC, Yoldas HO. Comparison of the shear bond strength of silorane-based composite resin and methacrylate based composite resin to MTA. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect 2018;12:1-5. https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.001
  9. Tuloglu N, Sen Tunc E, Ozer S, Bayrak S. Shear bond strength of self-adhering flowable composite on dentin with and without application of an adhesive system. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2014;12:97-101. https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000166
  10. Bucuta S, Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1991-2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1177-y
  11. Vichi A, Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, Papacchini F, Ferrari M. Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1497-1506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0846-6
  12. Sultana N, Nawal RR, Chaudhry S, Sivakumar M, Talwar S. Effect of acid etching on the micro-shear bond strength of resin composite-calcium silicate interface evaluated over different time intervals of bond aging. J Conserv Dent 2018;21:194-197. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_167_17
  13. Tunc ES, Sonmez IS, Bayrak S, Egilmez T. The evaluation of bond strength of a composite and a compomer to white mineral trioxide aggregate with two different bonding systems. J Endod 2008;34:603-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.026
  14. Peterson J, Rizk M, Hoch M, Wiegand A. Bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite. Odontology 2018;106:171-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-017-0324-3
  15. Yesilyurt C, Ceyhanli KT, Kedici Alp C, Yildirim T, Tasdemir T. In vitro bonding effectiveness of new self-adhering flowable composite to calcium silicate-based material. Dent Mater J 2014;33:319-324. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-211
  16. Doozaneh M, Koohpeima F, Firouzmandi M, Abbassiyan F. Shear bond strength of self-adhering flowable composite and resin-modified glass ionomer to two pulp capping materials. Iran Endod J 2017;12:103-107.
  17. Tyagi N, Chaman C, Tyagi SP, Singh UP, Sharma A. The shear bond strength of MTA with three different types of adhesive systems: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2016;19:130-133. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.178687
  18. Shin JH, Jang JH, Park SH, Kim E. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate surface treatments on morphology and bond strength to composite resin. J Endod 2014;40:1210-1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.027
  19. Tulumbaci F, Almaz ME, Arikan V, Mutluay MS. Shear bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine. J Conserv Dent 2017;20:292-296. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_97_17
  20. Kaup M, Dammann CH, Schafer E, Dammaschke T. Shear bond strength of Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, glass ionomer cement and composite resin on human dentine ex vivo. Head Face Med 2015;11:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-015-0071-z
  21. Jeong H, Lee N, Lee S. Comparison of shear bond strength of different restorative materials to tricalcium silicate-based pulp capping materials. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2017;44:200-209.
  22. Cantekin K. Bond strength of different restorative materials to light-curable mineral trioxide aggregate. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;39:143-148. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.39.2.84x57tp110k46183
  23. Deepa VL, Dhamaraju B, Bollu IP, Balaji TS. Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to three different liners: TheraCal LC, Biodentine, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement using universal adhesive: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2016;19:166-170. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.178696
  24. Alzraikat H, Taha NA, Qasrawi D, Burrow MF. Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems. Dent Mater J 2016;35:881-887. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-075
  25. Karadas M, Cantekin K, Gumus H, Ates SM, Duymus ZY. Evaluation of the bond strength of different adhesive agents to a resin-modified calcium silicate material (TheraCal LC). Scanning 2016;38:403-411. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21284

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Different Pulp Capping Materials to Dental Adhesive Systems: An In Vitro Study vol.12, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/2320206821997983
  2. How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings? vol.47, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2