Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (대한구강악안면외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Is open peer review, a growing trend in scholarly publishing, a double-edged sword?

  • Park, Joo-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2020.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Zuckerman H, Merton RK. Patterns of evaluation in science: institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva 1971;9:66-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01553188
  2. Weller AC. Editorial peer review: its strengths and weaknesses. Medford: Information Today; 2001:1-3.
  3. Mulligan A. Is peer review in crisis? Perspect Publ 2004;2:1-6.
  4. Publishing Research Consortium. Publishing Research Consortium peer review survey 2015. Bristol: Mark Ware Consulting; 2016:2-4.
  5. Lachmann P. The research integrity initiative: progress report. In: White C, ed. The COPE report 2002: annual report of the Committee on Publication Ethics. London: BMJ Books; 2002:11.
  6. Justice AC, Cho MK, Winker MA, Berlin JA, Rennie D. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER investigators. JAMA 1998;280:240-2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.240
  7. Fennell C, Corney A, Ash E. Transparency - the key to trust in peer review [Internet]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Connect [cited 2017 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/transparency-the-key-to-trust-in-peer-review.
  8. Ford E. Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview. F1000Res 2015;4:6. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6005.2
  9. Mehmani B. Is open peer review the way forward? [Internet]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Connect [cited 2016 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers-update/story/innovation-inpublishing/is-open-peer-review-the-way-forward.
  10. van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Black N, Smith R. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial. BMJ 1999;318:23-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7175.23