DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Protocol for management of odontogenic keratocysts considering recurrence according to treatment methods

  • Titinchi, Fadi (Department of Maxillo-Facial and Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry and WHO Collaborating Centres, University of the Western Cape)
  • Received : 2020.05.28
  • Accepted : 2020.08.10
  • Published : 2020.10.31

Abstract

The management of odontogenic keratocysts (OKC) remains a hotly debated topic in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Despite numerous studies and systematic reviews on treatment options, there is a lack of consensus and no accepted protocol on the management of OKC. Hence, the aim of this study was to briefly summarize all large systematic reviews in the literature on the management of OKC and formulate an evidence-based management protocol. Data from five large systematic reviews were combined to calculate the mean recurrence rate for each technique. Decompression followed by enucleation along with adjuvant methods such as application of Carnoy's solution and peripheral ostectomy can result in very low recurrence and is an acceptable first line treatment. The surgical approach should be determined by lesion size, patient age, proximity to vital structures, accessibility, soft tissue/cortical perforation, and if the lesion is recurrent.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Moraissi EA, Dahan AA, Alwadeai MS, Oginni FO, Al-Jamali JM, Alkhutari AS, et al. What surgical treatment has the lowest recurrence rate following the management of keratocystic odontogenic tumor?: a large systematic review and meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017;45:131-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.10.013
  2. Pogrel MA. The keratocystic odontogenic tumor. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2013;25:21-30, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2012.11.003
  3. Tomomatsu N, Uzawa N, Michi Y, Kurohara K, Okada N, Amagasa T. Clinical study of keratocystic odontogenic tumors. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;38:55-63. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2012.38.1.55
  4. de Castro MS, Caixeta CA, de Carli ML, Ribeiro Junior NV, Miyazawa M, Pereira AAC, et al. Conservative surgical treatments for nonsyndromic odontogenic keratocysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:2089-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2315-8
  5. Johnson NR, Batstone MD, Savage NW. Management and recurrence of keratocystic odontogenic tumor: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;116:e271-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2011.12.028
  6. Kaczmarzyk T, Mojsa I, Stypulkowska J. A systematic review of the recurrence rate for keratocystic odontogenic tumour in relation to treatment modalities. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:756-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.02.008
  7. Chrcanovic BR, Gomez RS. Recurrence probability for keratocystic odontogenic tumors: an analysis of 6427 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017;45:244-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.11.010
  8. van Rensburg LJ, Paquette M, Morkel JA, Nortje CJ. Correlative MRI and CT imaging of the odontogenic keratocyst: a review of twenty-one cases. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2003;15:363-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042-3699(03)00037-2
  9. Al-Moraissi EA, Pogrel MA, Ellis E 3rd. Does the excision of overlying oral mucosa reduce the recurrence rate in the treatment of the keratocystic odontogenic tumor? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:1974-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.043
  10. Titinchi F, Nortje CJ. Keratocystic odontogenic tumor: a recurrence analysis of clinical and radiographic parameters. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;114:136-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.01.032

Cited by

  1. Changes in Cellular Regulatory Factors before and after Decompression of Odontogenic Keratocysts vol.10, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10010030
  2. Deep Learning-Based Microscopic Diagnosis of Odontogenic Keratocysts and Non-Keratocysts in Haematoxylin and Eosin-Stained Incisional Biopsies vol.11, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122184