Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development (농촌지도와개발)

Korean Society of Agricultural Extension (한국농촌지도학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Regional Centrality by Investigating Direct and Indirect Flows of Commuters

통근통행에 의한 직·간접 흐름을 이용한 지역의 중심성 분석

  • Received : 2020.08.11
  • Accepted : 2020.09.16
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The regional centrality plays a very important role in national and regional planning and it is measured by data such as people, goods, and information flows among regions. The inter-regional flows are usually considered by only direct flows, yet indirect flows, which are generated accordingly from direct flows, are not critically considered. Most centrality studies have also hardly reflected the indirect flow in the network analysis. This study demonstrates the significance of the indirect flows to enhance accuracy of the regional centrality. The nationwide dataset of inter-regional commuter traffic matrix is used in this study and analysed into two groups; one to consider only direct flow and the other both direct and indirect flows. The results indicate remarkable differences of centrality raking between two groups such as Yeongam of Jeonnam Province(+60th), Eumseong of Chungbuk Province(+57th), Gwacheon of Gyeonggi Province (-35th), and Nowon of Seoul (-32nd). It clearly shows the significant influence of indirect flow for regional centrality study. This also reveals regional centrality ranking in Korea by considering direct and indirect flows of commuters. Jung, Gangnam, and Jongno of Seoul are categorized in the highest rank group and Ulleung of Gyeongbuk, Ongjin of Incheon, and Jindo of Jeonnam are in the lowest group. The top group includes seven districts of Seoul, two of Busan, and one of Gyeonggi Province. The bottom group includes mostly island and costal areas. As this study shows an accurate method of centrality measurement, it has a significant implication to lead an effective regional planning.

Keywords

References

  1. 김성록. (2014). 수도권 공간구조 변화에 관한 연구: 1995년-2010년. 국토지리학회지, 48(1), 57-68.
  2. 김효진. (2008). 사회네트워크 분석을 이용한 통근연구: 서울대도시권의 시간대별 통근. 지리교육논집, 52, 25-43.
  3. 김희철, & 안건혁. (2012). 연결망 이론으로 본 인구, 고용, 사회적 자본과 서울 대도시권 중심성 사이의 관계. 국토계획, 47(3), 105-122.
  4. 남영우. (2007). 도시공간구조론. 서울: 법문사.
  5. 성준용. (1990). 한국도시시스템. 서울: 교학연구사.
  6. 박시현, 이원도, & 조창현. (2012). 수도권 가구동행조사를바탕으로한서울시 교통네트워크 분석. 국토 지리학회지, 46(2), 189-200.
  7. 이성용, & 하창현. (2014). 제주지역의 인구이동과 지역 구조변화 분석. 국토계획, 49(2), 41-53. DOI:10.17208/jkpa.2014.04.49.2.41
  8. 이종상. (2007). O-D행렬에서 간접류의 재해석과 계산방법의 개선. 한국지역개발학회지, 19(2), 1-14.
  9. 이종상. (2008). 상호작용 분석을 통한 수도권 공간구조와 그 변화: 1995-2005년. 한국도시지리 학회지, 11(3), 91-100.
  10. 이종상, 서영창, & 김성록. (2018a). 네트워크 분석을 이용한 지역의 중심성 측정: 지역간 경쟁관계를 중심으로. 국토계획, 53(4), 87-93. DOI:10.17208/jkpa.2018.08.53.4.87
  11. 이종상, 서영창, & 김성록. (2018b). 지역의 규모를 고려한 네트워크 중심성분석: 통근통행 자료의 변환을 중심으로-. 한국지역개발학회지, 30(4), 71-84.
  12. 이희연, & 김홍주. (2006). 서울대도시권 통근 네트워크 구조 분석. 한국도시지리학회지, 9(1), 91-111.
  13. 이희연, & 이승민. (2008). 수도권 신도시 개발이 인구 이동과 통근통행패턴에미친영향. 대한지리학회지, 43(4), 561-579.
  14. 주미진, & 김성연. (2014). 가구통행 분석을 통한 도시 중심성 변화 연구: 성남시 수정구, 중원구, 분당구를 중심으로. 국토연구, 80, 35-48. https://doi.org/10.15793/KSPR.2014.80..003
  15. 통계청. (2017). 2015 인구주택총조사보고서. 대전.
  16. 村山祐司. (1982). 結節地域設定に關するNystuen-Daceyモデルの再檢討. 地理科學, 37(2), 73-84.
  17. 竹內啓. (1974). 線形數學-補訂版. 東京: 倍風館.
  18. 森川 洋. (1978). 結節地域⋅機能地域の分析手法ー中國地方を例として. 人文地理, 30(1), 17-37.
  19. Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182. https://doi.org/10.1086/228631
  20. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6 for windows software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  21. Cates, D. B. (1978). Short-run structural change in an active network of declining connectivity. Professional Geography, 30, 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1978.00009.x
  22. Cook, K. S., Emerson, M., Gillmore, M. R., & Toshio, Y. (1983). The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. The American Journal of Sociology, 89(2), 275-305. https://doi.org/10.1086/227866
  23. Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  24. Nystuen, J. D., & Dacey, M. F. (1961). A graph theory interpretation of nodal regions. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 7, 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01969070
  25. Reed, W. E. (1970). Indirect connectivity and hierarchies of urban dominance. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 60(4), 770-785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1970.tb00757.x
  26. Stephenson, L. K. (1974). On functional regions and indirect flows. Geographical Analysis, 6, 383-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1974.tb00522.x
  27. Tinkler, K. L. (1976). On functional regions and indirect flows. Geographical Analysis, 8, 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1976.tb01069.x