DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Cross-cultural Study of Influence Factors of Meat Substitutes between Korea and China

한·중 소비자들의 육류대체식품에 대한 구매의도에 미치는 영향 연구

  • Yaxin, Zhao (Department of Nutritional Science and Food Management, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Oh, Ji Eun (College of Science & Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Cho, Mi Sook (Department of Nutritional Science and Food Management, Ewha Womans University)
  • ;
  • 오지은 (이화여자대학교 신산업융합대학) ;
  • 조미숙 (이화여자대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2020.08.03
  • Accepted : 2020.09.02
  • Published : 2020.10.31

Abstract

This study examined the factors influencing the purchase intention of meat substitutes. A survey was conducted on 589 consumers in Korea (297 people) and China (292 people). The perception of meat substitute foods was lower in Korean consumers than in Chinese consumers, but there was no significant difference. The purchase intention of meat substitute foods was lower in Korean consumers than in Chinese consumers (p<0.01). Korean consumers' perception of meat substitute foods was higher in males than in females (p<0.01). The purchase intention of meat substitute foods also showed the same trend (p<0.001). Chinese consumers' perception of meat substitute foods was higher in males than in females. The overall purchase intention of meat substitute foods was significantly higher in males than in females (p<0.05). The perception of meat substitute foods by Korean consumers' was higher in their 40s and 50s than in their 20s and 30s. The purchase intention of meat substitute foods was also high in their 40s and 50s (p<0.01). On the other hand, the perception of meat substitute foods by Chinese consumers' was higher in their 20s and 30s than in their 40s and 50s (p<0.01). The purchase intention of meat substitute foods also showed the same trend (p<0.01). Korean consumers' perception of meat substitute foods had a significant positive effect on the purchase intention of meat substitutes (p<0.001). Chinese consumers' perception of meat substitute foods also had a significant positive effect on the purchase intention of meat substitute foods (p<0.001). Overall, food technology neophobia has a significant negative effect on the purchase intention of meat substitutes (p<0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Alexander P., Brown C., Arneth A., Dias C., Finnigan J., Moran D., Rounsevell M. D. A. 2017. Could consumption of insects, cultured meat or imitation meat reduce global agricultural land use?. Global Food Security, 15:22-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.04.001
  2. Almli VL, Lynn Van Wezemael, Oydis Ueland, Wim Verbeke. 2013. One technology does not fit all: Profiling consumers of tender and tenderised beef steaks. Meat Science, 93:361-370 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.10.002
  3. Azzurra A., Massimiliano A., Angela M. 2019. Measuring sustainable food consumption: A case study on organic Food. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17:95-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.09.007
  4. Christophe, I., Bruhn, M., Roosen, J. 2008. Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany. Appetite, 51:58-68 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.12.001
  5. Cox D.N., Evans G. 2008. Construction and validation of a psychometric scale to measure consumers' fears of novel food technologies: The food technology neophobia scale. Food Quality and Preference, 19:704-710 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.04.005
  6. Curtis, K. R., McCluskey, J. J., & Wahl, T. I. 2004. Consumer acceptance of genetically modified food products in the developing world. AgBioForum, 7(1):69-74
  7. De Boer J., Schosler H., Boersema J. J. 2013. Motivational differences in food orientation and the choice of snacks made from lentils, locusts, seaweed or "hybrid" meat. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1):32-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.07.008
  8. Feng Y, Chen XM, Zhao M. 2016. Edible insects of China, China Science and Technology Press. Beijing, pp 3-6
  9. Fox J.A. 2002. Influences on purchase of irradiated foods. Food Technology, 56 (11):34-37
  10. Galati A., Tulone A., Moavero P., Crescimanno M. 2019. Consumer interest in information regarding novel food technologies in Italy: The case of irradiated foods. Food Research International, 119:291-296 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.01.065
  11. Gaskell G., Stares S., Allansdottir A., Allum N., Corchero C., Fischler C., Hampel J., Jackson J., Kronberger N., Mejlgaard N., Revuelta G., Schreiner C., Torgersen H., Wagner W. 2006. Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and Trends. Publications Office of the European Union.
  12. Gomez-Luciano C.A., Luis Kluwe de Aguiar, Frank Vriesekoop, Beatriz Urbano. 2019. Consumers' willingness to purchase three alternatives to meat proteins in the United Kingdom, Spain, Brazil and the Dominican Republic. Food Quality and Preference, 78:103732 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103732
  13. Green R. T. White, P. D. 1976. Methodological considerations in cross-national consumer research. Journal of International Business Studies, 7(2):81-87 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490703
  14. Hambleton R. K. 2005. Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, New Jersey: LEA.
  15. Huang J, Qiu H, Bai J, Pray C. 2006. Awareness, acceptance of and willingness to buy genetically modified foods in Urban China, Appetite, 46(2)144-151 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2005.11.005
  16. Jang WJ. 2020. A Study on Current Status and Prospects of Global Food-tech Industry. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 11(4):247-254 https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2020.11.4.247
  17. Jeong JY, Jo C. 2018. The Application of Meat Alternatives and Ingredients for Meat and Processed Meat Industry. Food Sci. Anim. Resour., 7(1):2-11
  18. Kim YK. 2005. Meat consumption and health. J East Asian Soc Diet Life, 21-34
  19. Kwon SJ. 2005. Meat and food culture in East Asia. J East Asian Soc Diet Life, 1-20
  20. Lee HJ, Jo CH. 2019. Global alternative meat development trends. World Agriculture, 233(0):51-71
  21. Lee HN, Jung SH, Shin MK. 2011. A Comparative Study on Green Consumption Behavior between Korean and Chinese Women. Journal of Consumption Culture, 14(4):183-207 https://doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2011.14.4.010
  22. Lee JM, Kim YC. 2018. Alternative livestock product development trends and implications. Korea Rural Economic Institute, 170:1-23
  23. Lim DH. 2011. Global Approaching Strategies of Health Functional Foods. The korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition, 105-106
  24. Lim HP, Lee SS. 2014. A Study on Purchase Intention to Factors Related to Well-Being Food between South Korean and Chinese Consumers. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 32(2):117-130 https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2014.32.2.117
  25. Mancini M.C., Antonioli F. 2019. Exploring consumers' attitude towards cultured meat in Italy, Meat science, 150:101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.12.014
  26. McCluskey, J. J., Grimsrud, K. M., & Wahl, T. I. 2006. Comparison of consumer responses to genetically modified foods in Asia, North America, and Europe. In R. E. Just, J. M. Alston, & D. Zilberman (Eds.), Natural resource management and policy: Regulating agricultural biotechnology. Economics and policy, Vol. 30 (pp. 227-240). US: Springer.
  27. Orsi L., Voege L.L., Stranieri S. 2019. Eating edible insects as sustainable food? Exploring the determinants of consumer acceptance in Germany, Food Research International, 125:108573 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108573
  28. Roininen K., Lahteenmaki L., Tuorila H. 1999. Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite, 33:71-88 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1999.0232
  29. Rollin F, Kennedy J, Wills J. 2011. Consumers and new food technologies, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 22(2):99-111 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2010.09.001
  30. Schosler, H., de Boer, J., & Boersema, J. J. 2012. Can we cut out the meat of the dish? Constructing consumer-oriented pathways towards meat substitution. Appetite, 58:39-47 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.009
  31. Slade P. 2018. If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers. Appetite, 125:428-437 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030
  32. T. Laukkanen, M. Pasanen. 2008. Mobile banking innovators and early adopters: How they differ from other online users?. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 13:86-94 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fsm.4760077
  33. Vallerand, R. J. 1989. Vers une methodologie de validation trans-culturelle de questionnaires psychologiques: Implication pour la recherche en langue francaise. Canadian Psychology, 30(4):662-680 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079856
  34. Verbeke W. 2015. Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Quality and Preference, 39:147-155 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008
  35. Wilks, M., Phillips, C. J. 2017. Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States. PLOS One, 12(2), e0171904. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171904
  36. Yu SH, Choi AR, Koo HG. 2019. A Study on the Consumer Type of Insect Food. Consumer policy and education review, 15(1):157-182 https://doi.org/10.15790/cope.2019.15.1.157
  37. Zhang MJ, Ryu MH. 2019. Chinese New Retail Fresh Food Mart Selection Attributes on Use Intentions: Focusing on the Moderating Effects of Trust. Korean Consumption Culture Association, 22(2):229-252 https://doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2019.22.2.011
  38. Zhang, X., Huang, J., Qiu, H., & Huang, Z. 2010. A consumer segmentation study with regards to genetically modified food in urban China. Food Policy, 35(5), 456-462 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.04.008
  39. Dong xiangyi, "Artificial meat" national standard will be released, is expected to occupy 60% of the share of meat (嫩蘭紳왓出台 有望占据60%肉食) 2020. Available from: http://www.jwview.com/, [accessed 2020.01.06]
  40. OECD Data 2019. Available from: http://www.jwview.com/, [accessed 2020.02.08]