한국가정과교육학회지 (Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association)

한국가정과교육학회 (Korea Home Economics Education Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중학교 가정교과와 타 교과에 제시된 소비자역량의 내용과 구성요소 분석

Analysis of the Content and Components of Consumer Competency Presented in Home Economics and Other Subjects of Middle School

  • 윤소희 (서울대학교 대학원 가정교육 전공) ;
  • 손상희 (서울대학교 소비자학과, 생활과학연구소) ;
  • 이수희 (서울대학교 사범대학)
  • Yoon, Sohee (Dept. of Home Economics Education, The Graduate School of Seoul National University) ;
  • Sohn, Sang-Hee (Dept of Consumer Science, Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Soo-Hee (College of Education, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.08.25
  • 심사 : 2020.09.29
  • 발행 : 2020.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 가정교과와 타 교과에 제시된 소비자역량의 내용과 구성요소를 분석하여 학교 소비자교육에서 청소년의 소비자역량을 함양하기 위해 가정교과가 담당해야 할 역할에 대한 시사점을 도출하는 데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2015 개정 교육과정에 기초하여 집필된 중학교 가정교과와 타 교과인 사회, 도덕, 기술, 국어, 수학, 미술, 체육 교과서를 대상으로 소비자역량 내용, 구성요소를 분석하였다. 소비자역량 내용은 소비자역량을 측정하기 위해 체계화된 한국소비자원의 소비자역량 내용체계를 준거로 활용하여 분석하였고, 소비자역량의 구성요소(지식, 태도, 실천)의 비중과 연계성을 분석하였다. 본 연구의 주요 결과와 시사점을 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 가정교과와 타 교과에 제시된 소비자역량의 내용에서 재무역량 이 양적으로 매우 부족하였으며, 가정교과는 재무역량 내용을 거의 다루지 않고 있었다. 둘째, 시민역량에서 책임수용은 비중 있게 다루고 있었던 반면, 권리주장과은 소홀히 다루고 있어, 권리와 책임 사이의 균형이 부족함을 확인할 수 있었다. 셋째, 가정교과에서 거래역량의 '정보통신기술활용'과 시민역량의 '소비자 참여'의 내용을 소홀히 다루고 있어 보완이 필요하였다. 넷째, 사회교과가 양적으로 가장 많은 내용을 다루고 있었으나, 내용의 범위 측면에서는 가정교과가 가장 다양한 소 영역의 내용을 제시하고 있었다. 다섯째, 교과별 소비자역량 내용의 초점을 살펴보면, 가정교과는 개인적 차원의 실천적 방안을 제시하는 내용이 주를 이루었고, 사회교과는 소비환경과 소비환경과의 상호작용을 고려하는 내용이 많았다. 한편, 도덕교과는 소비생활을 성찰하고 소비생활과 관련된 도덕적 문제를 다루고 있었다. 여섯째, 소비자교육 내용은 여전히 지식에 편중되어 있었으며, 소비자역량의 구성요소인 지식, 태도, 실천이 총체적으로 연계되어 제시되지 못하고 있었다.

This study aims to identify implications for the role of home economics in consumer education in middle schools focusing on building consumer competency. To this end, the content in middle school textbooks of home economics and other subjects, written according to the 2015 revised curriculum, were analyzed. This study examined consumer education content based on the consumer competency measurement index developed by the Korean Consumer Agency, and reviewed different foci presented by subjects. This study also investigated how the knowledge, attitude and practice, which are components of consumer competency, are presented. The major findings of this study can be summarized as follows: First, consumer competency content, presented in textbooks of home economics and other subjects, were comprised of citizenship competency(65.3%), transactional competency(27%), and financial competency(7.7%). Second, in terms of content on the consumer's citizenship competency, little attention was paid to consumer rights, revealing an imbalance between responsibilities and rights. Third, despite its importance, the "utilization of information and communications technology" in transaction competency, and "consumer participation" in citizenship competency are insufficiently covered in the home economics. Fourth, social studies was the subject that most extensively covered the content of consumer competency. In terms of scope, home economics dealt with most of the sub-fields. Fifth, even when the same content of consumer competency was covered, it was presented differently by subject. Sixth, there was a lack of connection between components of consumer competency-knowledge, attitude, and practice, with a disproportionately high emphasis on knowledge. In conclusion, this study concluded that consumer education content of middle school subjects is insufficient to enhance consumer competency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Benn, J. (2004). Consumer education between 'consumership' and citizenship: experiences from studies of young people. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 28(2), 108-116. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2003.003654.x
  2. Braun, B. S. (1979). Consumer economic knowledge of older women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, USA.
  3. Cheon, H. J., Kim, S. W., Lee, D. I., & Lee, J. H. (2014). Creating shared values : Redefining the role of the corporation and consumer. The Korean Society of Consumer Studies, 25(3), 1-19.
  4. Choi, J. W., Chun, Y. S., & Rha, J.-Y. (2015). A study on the expanded consumer roles in ICT environment. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 11(4), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.15790/cope.2015.11.4.055
  5. Choi, Y. J. (2018). A delphy study on the perceptions and prospects of financial education professionals. Social Studies Education, 57(3), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.37561/sse.2018.09.57.3.15
  6. Dickinson, V. H. (1980). Consumer education: A developmental approach. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference. Columbia: American Council on Consumer Interest.
  7. Fair Trade Commission (2007). The development of consumer competency measure and index. Sejong: Sejong: Author.
  8. Francis, J. J., Eccles, M. P., Johnston, M., Walker, A., Grimshaw, J., Foy, R.,...Bonetti, D. (2004). Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. Centre for Health Services Research. Retrieved from http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/1735/
  9. Heo, S. M. (2017). Analysis of finance units in secondary social studies curriculum: Focusing on the changes after the 2007 revised curriculum. Research in Social Studies Education, 24(4), 157-176.
  10. Huh, K. O., Ryu, S. G., & Han, S. J. (2007). An analysis of content of consumer education in middle school based on the 7th curriculum. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 3(1), 79-97.
  11. Ju, S. E. (2016). An analysis of contents on education for sustainable development (ESD) in middle school home economics textbook: focused on the units of 'adolescence consumption life'. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 28(2), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2016.06.28.2.79
  12. Ju, S. E., & Park, M. S. (2015). The analysis of core contents in consumer area from 1st to 2009 revised middle school home economics textbooks. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 27(4), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2015.12.27.4.37
  13. Kim, J.-S. (2014). Analysis on the contents of school consumer education: Focusing on unit of 'adolescent's consumption life' in technology.home Economics (1) textbooks used in the 2009 revised curriculum. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 23(1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.5934/kjhe.2014.23.1.63
  14. Kim, J. H., & Lee, Y. S. (2005). Comparison between the contents of management of resource and environment area in home economics textbook and those of other subject textbooks of middle school. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 17(1), 55-68.
  15. Kim, J. H., & Choe, H. C. (2011). The development of consumer financial competency measure. Financial Planning Review, 4(3), 1-36.
  16. Kim, J. S. (2018). Contents and perspective of sustainable development education reflected in middle school technology and home economics textbooks in South Korea: focusing on consumer life related units. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  17. Kim, N. E. (2018). Proposal of consumer life area curriculum in home economics education for ethical consumer practice. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 30(4), 57-81. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2018.12.30.4.57
  18. Korea Consumer Agency (2010). Measurement & evaluation of consumer competency in 2010. Eumseong: Author.
  19. Korea Consumer Agency (2014). 2014 Consumer empowerment index. Policy Research Report, 1-326. Eumseong: Author.
  20. Korea Consumer Agency (2015). A preliminary study for developing elementary school's content standards in consumer Education. Eumseong: Author.
  21. Korea Consumer Agency (2017). Consumer policy I past, present and future. Eumseong: Author.
  22. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
  23. Lee, J.-H. (2011). Effects of school consumer education on adolescents cellular phone consumption life. Unpublished master's thesis, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
  24. Lee, J. Y., & Yu, N. S. (2015). The analyses of duplicated contents of 'consumer life' area in technology & home economics and other subject textbooks for middle and high school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 27(4), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2015.12.27.4.121
  25. Lee, M. H. (2013). A study on influencing factors and characteristics of type of female consumer competency: Focused on marital status. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
  26. Lee, Y. S. (2010). An analysis on the unit of 'adolescence self-management' and 'adolescence consumption life' in technology.home economics textbook used in middle schools: focusing on how the emphasis of the 2007 curriculum revision in reflected. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 22(3), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.20464/kdea.2016.22.2.3
  27. McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence". American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-14. doi:10.1037/h0034092
  28. Ministry of Education (2015a). Practical Arts(Technology.Home Economics)/Information Curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74 [Separate 10]. Sejong.
  29. Ministry of Education (2015b). Social Studies Curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74 [Separate 7]. Sejong.
  30. Ministry of Education (2015c). Moral Studies Curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74 [Separate 6]. Sejong.
  31. Moon, Y. H. (2013). Toward a critical approach to the study on school consumer education in schools : An analysis of secondary home economics textbooks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  32. Moore, R. L., & Moschis, G. P. (1980). Social interaction and social structural determinants in adolescent consumer socialization. Association for Consumer Research, 7, 757-759.
  33. Moschis, G. P., & Churchill Jr, G. A. (1978). Consumer socialization: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of marketing research, 15(4), 599-609. doi:10.2307/3150629
  34. Oh, S. J., & Bae, S. Y. (2018). 2018 Consumer empowerment index in Korea. Journal of Consumer Policy Studies, 1-307.
  35. Owen, S. (1976). The development of the test of consumer competencies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, USA.
  36. Park, H. Y. (2010). An explanatory study on the concept and measure of digital consumer competency. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  37. Park, J. S., & Kim, J. S. (2017). Analysis of the content connectivity of the 2009 revised technology & home economics curriculum 'consumption' area. Family and Environment Research, 55(4), 337-349. https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2017.025
  38. Park, Y. M., & Lee, H. S. (2016). The difference of adolescents' consumer socialization according to gender. Journal of Consumer Policy Studies, 47(1), 213-243. https://doi.org/10.15723/jcps.47.1.201604.213
  39. Park. H. J. (2003). The content analysis of consumer education in the social studies textbooks under the 7th Korean national curriculum. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 35(1), 173-197.
  40. Rhee, K. C. (1985). A study on consumer education focusing on the development of adolescent consumer competencies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  41. Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003). Highlights from the OECD project definition and selection competencies: Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL: American Educational Research Association.
  42. Schahn, J., & Holzer, E. (1990). Studies of individual environmental concern: The role of knowledge, gender, and background variables. Environment and behavior, 22(6), 767-786. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916590226003
  43. Smith, D. C., & Park, C. W. (1992). The effects of brand extensions on market share and advertising efficiency. Journal of Marketing research, 29(3), 296-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379202900302
  44. Sohn, S.-H., Kim, K., Rha, J.-Y., & Choi, S. A. (2010). Green consumption competency: A conceptual model of its framework and components. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 6(3), 95-119.
  45. Song, S. Y. (2008). The direction of consumer education policy in the global age. Consumer Policy Trends, (4), 1-24.
  46. Spencer, M. L., & Spencer, M. S. (1993). Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. New York: John Wily & Son Inc..
  47. Wade, R. C. (1993). Content analysis of social studies textbooks: A review of ten years of research. Theory & Research in Social Education, 21(3), 232-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1993.10505703
  48. Yoo, H. J., & Joo, S.-H. (2012). Development of consumers' perceived food safety and food safety competency measurement. Korean Society of Consumer Sudies, 23(4), 79-104.
  49. Yoo, M.-R., & Koo, H.-G. (2018). 2015 A study on technology & home economics textbook comparison of middle school according to 2015 revised curriculum. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 14(3), 51-84. https://doi.org/10.15790/cope.2018.14.3.051