DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Text Analysis of Software Test Report

소프트웨어 시험성적서에 대한 텍스트 분석

  • Jung, Hye-Jung (Dept. of Data Information & Statistics, Pyeong-Taek University) ;
  • Han, Gun-Hee (Division of ICT, Baek-Seok University)
  • Received : 2020.09.07
  • Accepted : 2020.11.20
  • Published : 2020.11.28

Abstract

This study is to study a method of applying weights for quality characteristics in software test evaluation. The weight application method analyzes the text of the test report and uses the ratio according to the frequency of the text as a weight for the quality characteristics of the software test score. The feasibility review of the results of this study was conducted by comparing the results of the questionnaire survey, which made the developers and users to evaluate the importance of software, and the results of the frequency analysis of text analysis. When measuring quality based on the eight quality characteristics presented in ISO/IEC 25023, the result of this study is the software quality measurement result considering software characteristics, whereas the result of this study is the software quality measurement result by applying the same weight when measuring quality.

본 연구는 소프트웨어의 시험 평가에 있어 품질 특성에 대한 가중치를 적용하는 방법을 연구한 것이다. 가중치 적용방안은 시험성적서의 텍스트를 분석해서 텍스트의 빈도에 따른 비율을 소프트웨어 시험 성적의 품질 특성에 대한 가중치로 활용한다. 본 연구의 결과에 대한 타당성 검토는 개발자와 사용자를 중심으로 소프트웨어의 중요도를 평가하게 한 설문조사의 결과와 텍스트 분석의 빈도분석 결과를 비교해서 검토했다. ISO/IEC 25023에서 제시한 8가지 품질 특성을 기반으로 품질을 측정할 경우 동일한 가중치를 적용해서 소프트웨어 품질을 평가하는 것에 비하여 본 연구의 결과는 소프트웨어 특성을 고려한 소프트웨어 품질 측정 결과이므로 소프트웨어 시험 평가에 대한 품질 측정의 타당성이 높아진다고 할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. ISO/IEC 9126-2. (2003). Software Engineering - Product Quality -Part 2: Extenal metrics.
  2. ISO/IEC 25010. (2011). System and software engineering-System and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation(SQuaRE) -System and software quality model.
  3. ISO/IEC 25023. (2015). System and software engineering-System and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation(SQuaRE) - Measurment of system and software product quality.
  4. ISO/IEC 25000. (2005). System and software engineering: System and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation(SQuaRE) -Guide to SQuaRE.
  5. H. J. Jung. & G. H. Han. (2019). The Software Reliability Growth Model base on Software Error Data, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(3), 59-66. DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.3.059
  6. Z. Jelinski & P. B. Moranda. (1972). Software reliability research. In Statistical Computer Performance Evaluation, ED.W. Freiberger, Academic Press, New York, 465-497.
  7. A. L. Goel & K. Okumoto. (1979). Time dependent error-detection rate model for software reliavbility and other performance measures. IEEE Trans. Reliability, R-28, 206-211. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.1979.5220566
  8. H. J. Jung. (2014). The Effect Analysis of Software, The Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(1), 66-71.
  9. H. J. Jung. (2003). Performance Evaluation of Software Reliability Growth Model Using Plot of Fault Data, Korea Information Processing Society, 70-77.
  10. H. J. Jung. (2018). Reliability measurement applied to software quality assessment metrics, The Journal of Multimedia, 80-86.
  11. H. J. Jung. (2019). The software quality measurement based on software reliability model, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(4), 45-50. DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.4.045
  12. J. E. Sin. (2012). 'Applied SPSS Statistics Analysis', Kyony Moon.
  13. S. W. Kang & H. S. Yang. (2013). Quality Evaluation of Criterion Construction for Open Source Software, The Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(2), 77-81. DOI: 10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.2.323
  14. S. Y. Kim, Y. T. Kim & S. J. Lee. (2015). Influence Comparison of Customer Satisfaction using Quantile Regression Model, The Journal of Digital Police & Management, 13(6), 90-96.
  15. W. I. Keon. (2010). 'Software Testing for Developer', STA