DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship between the Diurnal Temperature Range and Wound Healing of Diabetic Foot: Animal Study

일교차가 당뇨병성 창상의 치유에 미치는 영향: 동물 실험 연구

  • Won, Sung Hun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Soon Chun Hyang University Seoul Hospital) ;
  • Chun, Dong-Il (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Soon Chun Hyang University Seoul Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Jaeho (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Park, In Keun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital) ;
  • Yi, Young (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital)
  • 원성훈 (순천향대학교 서울병원 정형외과) ;
  • 천동일 (순천향대학교 서울병원 정형외과) ;
  • 조재호 (한림대학교 춘천성심병원 정형외과) ;
  • 박인근 (인제대학교 서울백병원 정형외과) ;
  • 이영 (인제대학교 서울백병원 정형외과)
  • Received : 2020.10.29
  • Accepted : 2020.12.02
  • Published : 2020.12.15

Abstract

Purpose: Diabetic foot ulcers are closely related to body surface heat, which can be affected easily by temperature differences. This study examined the correlation between the healing process of diabetic wounds and abnormal diurnal temperature through an animal study. Materials and Methods: Rats in the abnormal diurnal temperature group and control group were given a 10 mm sized full-thickness skin ulcer. Wound size progression was observed in both groups. H&E and Masson's trichrome staining was performed at 14 days after wound formation, and the number of vessels per unit area and histology analysis were performed. The changes in the ulcer were measured through three dimensional cross-section area using INSIGHT® devices. Results: The wound recovery period (granulation ingrowing) was 24 days in the abnormal diurnal temperature model and 20 days in the control group. The thickness of scar tissue was 402±23.19 ㎛ in the control group and 424.5±36.94 ㎛ in the diurnal temperature model. Neovascular formation was counted as 5.1±0.97 for the control group and 4.16±0.94 for the diurnal temperature model group. Conclusion: Delayed and inferior diabetic wound healing was observed in the abnormal diurnal temperature group, which was characterized by greater diurnal variations than the typical growth environment.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2018R1C15042849).

References

  1. Keatinge WR, Coleshaw SR, Cotter F, Mattock M, Murphy M, Chelliah R. Increases in platelet and red cell counts, blood viscosity, and arterial pressure during mild surface cooling: factors in mortality from coronary and cerebral thrombosis in winter. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984;289:1405-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6456.1405.
  2. Li J, Chen J, Kirsner R. Pathophysiology of acute wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.09.007.
  3. Lavery LA, Higgins KR, Lanctot DR, Constantinides GP, Zamorano RG, Athanasiou KA, et al. Preventing diabetic foot ulcer recurrence in high-risk patients: use of temperature monitoring as a self-assessment tool. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:14-20. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1600.
  4. Lee SJ, Kim MJ, Jang SH, Lee KH, Han SH, Choi BY, et al. The difference of plantar temperature between non-DM and DM groups according to season. Korean J Clin Geri. 2007;8:412-8.
  5. Kokate JY, Leland KJ, Held AM, Hansen GL, Kveen GL, Johnson BA, et al. Temperature-modulated pressure ulcers: a porcine model. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:666-73. doi: 10.1016/s0003- 9993(95)80637-7.
  6. Menke NB, Ward KR, Witten TM, Bonchev DG, Diegelmann RF. Impaired wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25:19-25. doi: 10.1016/ j.clindermatol.2006.12.005.
  7. Yager DR, Zhang LY, Liang HX, Diegelmann RF, Cohen IK. Wound fluids from human pressure ulcers contain elevated matrix metalloproteinase levels and activity compared to surgical wound fluids. J Invest Dermatol. 1996;107:743-8. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12365637.
  8. Mast BA, Schultz GS. Interactions of cytokines, growth factors, and proteases in acute and chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 1996;4:411-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1996.40404.x.
  9. Kirsner RS, Eaglstein WH. The wound healing process. Dermatol Clin. 1993;11:629-40. doi: 10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30216-X.
  10. Enoch S, Leaper DJ. Basic science of wound healing. Surgery (Oxf). 2008;26:31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mpsur.2007.11.005.
  11. Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:738-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909023411006.
  12. Postlethwaite AE, Kang AH. Collagen-and collagen peptide-induced chemotaxis of human blood monocytes. J Exp Med. 1976;143:1299-307. doi: 10.1084/jem.143.6.1299.
  13. Lewis JS, Lee JA, Underwood JC, Harris AL, Lewis CE. Macrophage responses to hypoxia: relevance to disease mechanisms. J Leukoc Biol. 1999;66:889-900. doi: 10.1002/jlb.66.6.889.
  14. Falanga V. The chronic wound: impaired healing and solutions in the context of wound bed preparation. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2004;32:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2003.09.020.
  15. Eming SA, Krieg T, Davidson JM. Inflammation in wound repair: molecular and cellular mechanisms. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:514-25. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700701.
  16. Liechty KW, Kim HB, Adzick NS, Crombleholme TM. Fetal wound repair results in scar formation in interleukin-10-deficient mice in a syngeneic murine model of scarless fetal wound repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:866-72; discussion 872-3. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.6868.
  17. Stadelmann WK, Digenis AG, Tobin GR. Impediments to wound healing. Am J Surg. 1998;176(2A Suppl):39S-47S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00184-6.