DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

농가의 영농 신기술 수용요인 지표화 및 중요도 평가

Indexation and Importance Evaluation of Farmers' Acceptance Factors for New Farming Technologies

  • 정윤희 (충북대학교 농업경제학과) ;
  • 서상택 (충북대학교 농업경제학과)
  • Jeong, Yun Hee (Agricultural Economics, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Seo, Sangtaek (Agricultural Economics, Chungbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.10.12
  • 심사 : 2020.11.06
  • 발행 : 2020.11.30

초록

이 연구는 농촌진흥청의 전주기 경제성 분석단계 중 사후 경제성 분석단계에서 활용할 수 있는 농가의 신기술 수용요인을 지표화하고 중요도를 평가하기 위해 수행되었다. 선행연구 및 전문가 자문을 거쳐 농촌진흥청의 영농기술을 유형화하였으며, 전문가 델파이 조사를 통해 농가의 신기술 수용요인을 지표화하고 중요도를 평가하였다. 평가지표는 2계층으로 구분한 다음, 계층분석 방법(AHP)을 이용하여 중요도를 평가하였다. 중요도 평가결과, 1계층에서는 재무 수익성 43.9%, 기술성 23.6%, 노동환경 22.4%, 연관산업 및 기술지원체계 10.1%의 중요도를 보였으며, 2계층에서는 기술성의 경우 기술습득의 용이성 64.9%, 기술의 완성도 35.1%, 노동환경의 경우 노동강도 53.7%, 작업위험도 26.7%, 노동시간 19.6%, 재무 수익성의 경우 농가소득 증가수준 69.9%, 신규자금 소요수준 30.1%, 연관산업 및 기술지원체계의 경우 교육 및 기술지원체계 66.3%, 연관산업 활성화 정도 33.7%로 분석되었다. 이 연구는 영농활용기술의 농가 수용성을 높이고, 농업 연구 및 지도의 효율성과 효과성을 높일 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

This study developed indexes of farmers' acceptance factors for new farming technologies and evaluated the importance of the developed. For this study, farming technologies were classified according to the criteria established by the Rural Development Administration, and the Delphi technique was applied to evaluate the importance of the indexes. The indexes were composed of two tiers and evaluated by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Results showed that the importance of the first tier was finance and profitability with 43.9%, technology affairs 23.6%, labor environments 22.4%, and related industries and service system 10.1%. The importance of the second tier was the ease of technology acceptance 64.9% and technology completion 35.1% for technology affairs in the first tier, labor intensity 53.7%, work hazard 26.7%, working hours 19.6% for labor environment, farm income increment 69.9% and new fund required 30.1% for finance and profitability, and training and service system 66.7% and activation of related industries 33.7% for related industry and service system. This study may contribute to farmers' acceptance of new farming technologies and increase the efficiency and effectiveness of agricultural research and extension activities by the Rural Development Administration.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. U. S. Jeong, S. Seo, S. Kim, "Selection Factors for Cultivation Practices in Paddy Rice Farming," Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development, Vol.25, No.1, PP.45-56, Mar. 2018. DOI : 10.12653/jecd.2018.25.1.0045
  2. W. Kim, H. K. Kim, Y. S. Yu, J. J. Noh, Y. W. Chae, "Analysis on Determinants of Acceptance Intention of New Agricultural Technology: Using Innovation Resistance Model," Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (JKAIS), Vol.20, No.2, pp.190-199, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.2.190
  3. Y. J. Kim, H. S. Han, "An analysis on the propriety of pilot project and the Management Performance in Korea's new technology adaptation Farming," Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (JKAIS), Vol.16, No.9, pp.5859-5864, 2015. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.9.5859
  4. D. W. Choi, I. K. Yeon, H. W. Do, Q. L. Lin, "Effect Analysis of Introduction of New Agricultural Technology - Case Study Base on Automatic Switch for Heat Insulating Covering -," Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, Vol.18, No.2, pp.39-45, 2012. UCI : G704-001610.2012.18.2.007 https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2012.18.2.039
  5. W. S. Park, D. K. Suh, S. Y. Lee, "An Empirical Study on the Determinant Factors of New Technology Acceptance by Farmhouse Type," Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, Vol.36, No.3, pp.509-539, Sep. 2009. UCI : G704-000650.2009.36.3.007
  6. H. S. Shin, A. R. Lee, D. G. Seo, "Study on the Satisfaction and Economic Results of Farm Household about Introduction of New Agricultural Technology - Case Study: Fine Water Sprayer for Fruit Trees -," Journal of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, Vol.23, No.4, pp.1-17, Dec. 2011.
  7. S. Kim, U. S. Jeong, J. Ha, S. Seo, "A System Dynamics Analysis on Use Diffusion of Rice Wet Direct Seeding Technology - Focused on a Case of Pilot Village -," Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development, Vol.24, No.2, pp. 99-115, June. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12653/jecd.2017.24.2.0099
  8. J. H. Chung, S. Y. Yoon, "Analysis of Preliminary Feasibility Evaluation Indicator Factor in Convergence of Agriculture Sector Facility Business Model and Priority analysis of using AHP," Journal of social science, Vol.25, No.1, pp.257-275, Mar. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46415/jss.2018.03.25.1.257
  9. J. W. Yun, Y. W. Chae, Y. J. An, S. S. Kim, "A Priority Analysis of Excellent Agricultural R&D Performance Considering Region-wide Diffusion Effect," Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.21, No.4 pp.471-478, 2020 DOI : 10.5762/KAIS.2020.21.4.471
  10. J. Y. Jeon, C. H. Rhew, E. S. Hwang, "A Study on Prioritizing Food Policy : Application of AHP," Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, Vol.43, No.1, pp.130-151, Mar. 2016. UCI : G704-000650.2016.43.1.004
  11. U. S. Jeong, S. Kim, S. Seo, S. Kim, "An Economic Analysis for No-Till Practice of Paddy Rice with Greenhouse Gas Reduction Effect," Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, Vol.44, No 4, PP.831-856, Dec. 2017.
  12. K. H. Yu, "A Study of the effects on the Preliminary Feasibility Study Results," Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University, 2014. 8.
  13. K. Y. Ku, "Study on pre-assessment indicators developing new agricultural research and development," Department of Theology, Hoseo Graduate School of Venture Seoul, Korea, 2010.
  14. Rural Development Administration, "2020 Guidelines for Implementation of Rural Guidance Projects," 2020.
  15. [Internet] Rural Development Administration Nongsaro Homepage.(http://www.nongsaro.go.kr/portal/ps/psb/ psbb/farmUseTechTypeSrch.ps?menuId=PS00072)