Journal of Convergence for Information Technology (융합정보논문지)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Mediating Effect of Protean Career Attitude on the Relationship Between Coaching Leadership and Career Satisfaction

코칭리더십과 경력만족 간의 관계에서 프로티언 경력태도의 매개효과

  • Yun, Ducksu (College of Business Administration, Kookmin University) ;
  • Kim, Boyoung (College of Business Administration, Kookmin University)
  • 윤덕수 (국민대학교 대학원 경영학전공) ;
  • 김보영 (국민대학교 경영대학)
  • Received : 2021.07.21
  • Accepted : 2021.12.20
  • Published : 2021.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is as follows: First, this study investigates the effect of the supervisor's coaching leadership on the employee's protean career attitude. Second, we examine the effect of a protean career attitude on career satisfaction. Finally, we examine the mediating effect of protean career attitude on the relationship between supervisor's coaching leadership and career satisfaction. As a result of analyzing the data of 329 employees from pharmaceutical companies, the positive influence of coaching leadership on the protean career attitude was significant. The positive effect of the protean career attitude on career satisfaction was significant. The mediating effect of the protean career attitude on the relationship between coaching leadership and career satisfaction was significant. The findings of this study provide an understanding regarding the concept of career development, which has recently changed from an organization-centered to an individual-centered perspective. Also, this study has theoretical and practical implications for the field of human resource development in that it suggests the type of leadership as an antecedent of protean career attitudes.

본 연구 목적은 첫째, 프로티언 경력태도의 선행 요인으로서 상사의 코칭리더십의 효과를 고찰하고, 둘째, 프로티언 경력태도가 주관적 경력성공인 경력만족에 미치는 영향력을 검증하며, 셋째, 프로티언 경력태도가 코칭리더십과 경력만족간의 관계를 매개하는 매개효과를 검증하는 것이다. 제약업체 종사자 329명의 데이터를 분석한 결과, 코칭리더십이 프로티언 경력태도에 미치는 긍정적 영향력이 유의하였으며, 프로티언 경력태도가 경력만족에 미치는 긍정적 영향력이 유의하였다. 또한 상사의 코칭리더십과 경력만족간의 관계를 매개하는 프로티언 경력태도의 매개효과가 유의하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 최근 들어 조직 중심적 관점에서 개인 중심적 관점으로 변화된 경력개발에 대한 개념을 이해하고, 리더십 차원에서 이를 촉진할 수 있는 요인을 고찰함으로써 인적자원개발 분야의 이론적·실무적 함의를 제공한다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Shin & J. Jeong. (2014). The causal relationships among subjective career success, job security, organizational career management support, protean career attitudes, and protean career management behavior of the workers in major industries, Korea. Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, 46(2), 186-213.
  2. D. T. Hall & P. H. Mirvis. (1996). The new career contract: Developing the whole person at mid life and beyond. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47(3), 269-289. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1995.0004
  3. J. S. Nam. (2004). The hierarchical linear relationship among subjective career success, individual characteristics, and organizational characteristics of office workers in large corporations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul.
  4. P. A. Helsin. (2005). Conceptualizing and evaluating career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(2), 113-136. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.270
  5. D. T. Hall. (1976). Career in organization. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foreman.
  6. B. M. Wiernik & J. W. Kostal. (2019). Protean and boundaryless career orientation: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 66(3), 280-307. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000324
  7. D. T. Hall. (2004). The protean career: A quarter-century journey. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.006
  8. R. Rodrigues, C. L. Butler & D. Guest. (2019). Antecedents of protean and boundaryless career orientation: The role of core self-evaluations, perceived employability and social capital. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110(Part A), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.11.003
  9. L. Cortellazzo, S. Bonesso, F. Gerli & J. M. BatistaFoguet. (2020). Protean career orientation: Behavioral antecedents and employability outcome. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 116(Part A), 103343. DOI : 10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103343.
  10. J. S. Stowell. (1986). Leadership & coaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  11. A. D. Ellinger, A. E. Ellinger & S. B. Keller. (2003). Supervisory coaching behavior, employee satisfaction, and warehouse employee performance: A dyadic perspective in the distribution industry. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(4), 435-457. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1078
  12. T. Ng, L. Eby, K. Sorensen & D. Feldman. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 168-178.
  13. M. B. Arthur & D. M. Rousseau. (1996). Introduction: The boundaryless career as a new employment principle. New York: Oxford University Press.
  14. M. S. Direnzo & J. H. Greenhaus. (2011). Job search and voluntary turnover in a boundaryless world: A control theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.61031812
  15. D. T. Hall. (2002). Career in and out of organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
  16. J. P. Briscoe, D. T. Hall & R. L. F. DeMuth. (2006). Protean and boundaryless careers: An empirical exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.09.003
  17. A. D. Vos & N. Soens. (2008). Protean attitude and career success: The mediating role of self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 449-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.08.007
  18. M. Homan & L. J. Miller. (2008). Coaching in organization: Best coaching practice from the Ken Blanchard companies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  19. International Coaching Federation. (retrieved 2021.7.) https://coachingfederation.org/about
  20. E. Cho & J. Tak. (2012). Development and validity of the coaching leadership scale. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24(1), 127-155. https://doi.org/10.24230/KSIOP.24.1.201102.127
  21. S. J. Kim & J. W. Kim. (2010). Empirical relationships among protean career attitude, boundaryless career and subjective career success. The Korea Business Review, 23(4), 1899-1915.
  22. G. Jaskolka, J. M. Beyer & H. M. Trice. (1985). Measuring and predicting managerial success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26(2), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(85)90018-1
  23. J. J. Kim. (2009). A Study on effects of influential factors on career success: Comparing women managers in Korea and the United States. Korea Business Review, 13(2), 125-155.
  24. E. Cho & J. Tak. (2012). Study on the influence of career planing and positive psychological capital on subjective career success: Moderating effects of future time perspective and coaching leadership. The Korean Psychological Association, 25(4), 727-748.
  25. S. E. Sibert & M. L. Kraimer. (2001). The five factor model of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1757
  26. R. M. Ryan & E. L. Deci. (2000). Selfdetermination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  27. D. K. Sherman. (2013). Self-Affirmation Understanding the effects. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(11), 834-845. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12072
  28. C. C. Manz & H. P. Jr. Sims. (1991). Superleadership: Beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19(4), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(91)90051-A
  29. L. D. Sargent & S. R. Domberger. (2007). Exploring the development of a protean career orientation: Values and image violations. Career Development International, 12(6), 545-564. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430710822010
  30. G. Yukl. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00013-2
  31. J. H. Greenhaus, S. J. Parasuraman & W. M. Wornley. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64-86. https://doi.org/10.2307/256352
  32. H. H. Harman. (1960). Modern factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  33. J. Ford, R. McCallum & M. Tait. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personality Psychology, 39(2), 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x
  34. T. D. Little, M. Rhemtulla, K. Gibson & A. M. Schoemann. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266
  35. M. W. Brown & R. Cudeck. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models(pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  36. C. Fornell & & D. F. Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(10), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  37. K. J. Peacher, D. D. Rucker & A. F. Hayes. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research Methods, 40(1), 879-891.
  38. W. S. Jang. (2011). Human Resource Development: Theory and Practice. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  39. R. L. Miller, C. J. Butler & C. J. Cosentino. (2004). Followership effectiveness: An extension of Fiedler's contingency model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(4), 362-368. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410538680
  40. E. S. Hong. (2018. 12). Are you coaching and is it done only for talking about problem? Millennial are anxious to communicate. Dong-A DBR. 262(1), 42-50.