DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

One-stage reconstruction of full-thickness alar defects with a folded nasolabial island flap

  • Lee, Da Woon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ryu, Hyeong Rae (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Hwan Jun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jun Hyuk (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2021.07.31
  • Accepted : 2021.08.20
  • Published : 2021.12.20

Abstract

Background: The reconstruction of large full-thickness alar defects requires complex surgical procedures that are usually performed in two stages, with concomitant disadvantages in terms of patient trauma, surgical risk, and cost. This study presents a functional folded nasolabial island flap (FNIF) that can be used to repair large-sized full-thickness alar defects in a straightforward manner. Methods: This retrospective study included seven patients who received a FNIF for a full-thickness alar defect between January 2007 and December 2020. The FNIF is different from the conventional nasolabial flap in that it is folded and twisted to achieve nostril reconstruction with a satisfactory three-dimensional mucosal lining in a single stage. The cosmetic and functional results of FNIF were evaluated by both patients and physicians. Results: The age ranged from 51 to 82 years (mean, 65.6 years). The causes of the defects were squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and trigeminal trophic syndrome. The nostril lining did not collapse, there was no hypertrophic scarring, and air movement through the nostrils on the flap side was normal. Overall, FNIF produced excellent aesthetic and functional outcomes, with minimal patient discomfort. There were no postoperative complications. Conclusion: Compared with existing reconstruction methods for large full-thickness alar defects, FNIF can easily achieve aesthetic and functional success in a single-stage procedure. It provides satisfactory results for both the patient and the surgeon.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2021R1G1A1008337) and was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.

References

  1. Driscoll BP, Baker SR. Reconstruction of nasal alar defects. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001;3:91-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.3.2.91
  2. Griffin GR, Chepeha DB, Moyer JS. Interpolated subcutaneous fat pedicle melolabial flap for large nasal lining defects. Laryngoscope 2013;123:356-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23595
  3. Park YJ, Kwon GH, Kim JO, Ryu WS, Lee KS. Reconstruction of nasal ala and tip following skin cancer resection. Arch Craniofac Surg 2019;20:382-7. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2019.00486
  4. Herbert DC. A subcutaneous pedicled cheek flap for reconstruction of alar defects. Br J Plast Surg 1978;31:79-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(78)90055-3
  5. Cook JL. Reconstruction of a full-thickness alar wound with a single operative procedure. Dermatol Surg 2003;29:956-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042728-200309000-00016
  6. Klinger M, Maione L, Villani F, Caviggioli F, Forcellini D, Klinger F. Reconstruction of a full-thickness alar wound using an auricular conchal composite graft. Can J Plast Surg 2010;18:149-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031001800409
  7. Lim J, Oh J, Eun S. Flap reconstruction of soft tissue defect after resecting a huge hemangioma of the nose. Arch Craniofac Surg 2020;21:69-72. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2019.00668
  8. Kim ES, Heo JW, Yang CE, Kim J, Kim SW. Correction of a nasal soft triangle deficiency as a complication of augmentation rhinoplasty. Arch Craniofac Surg 2021;22:161-3. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00143
  9. Asaria J, Pepper JP, Baker SR. Key issues in nasal reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;18:278-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e32833af8f8
  10. Fujiwara M. One-stage reconstruction of an alar defect using a bilobed nasolabial-nasal tip flap based on the aesthetic subunits in Orientals: case report. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004;28:13-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-3122-6
  11. Uchinuma E, Matsui K, Shimakura Y, Murashita K, Shioya N. Evaluation of the median forehead flap and the nasolabial flap in nasal reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1997;21:86-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002669900089
  12. Tardy ME Jr, Sykes J, Kron T. The precise midline forehead flap in reconstruction of the nose. Clin Plast Surg 1985;12:481-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0094-1298(20)31674-6
  13. Yoon SM, Lee DW, Nam SM, Wee SY, Jeong HG, Choi CY. Four limb shaped auricular chondrocutaneous composite graft for the alar and the columellar defects. Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017;23:149-54. https://doi.org/10.14730/aaps.2017.23.3.149
  14. Qian C, Yaodong X, Xiaoming H, Shaochong F, Yiqing Z. Repair of full-thickness alar defects. Dermatol Surg 2012;38:1639-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02494.x
  15. van der Eerden PA, Verdam FJ, Dennis SC, Vuyk H. Free cartilage grafts and healing by secondary intention: a viable reconstructive combination after excision of nonmelanoma skin cancer in the nasal alar region. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009;11:18-23. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.2008.501
  16. Spear SL, Kroll SS, Romm S. A new twist to the nasolabial flap for reconstruction of lateral alar defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;79:915-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198706000-00010
  17. Pers M. Cheek flaps in partial rhinoplasty: a new variation: the in-and-out flap. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1967;1:37-44. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316709006558
  18. Yoon TH, Yun IS, Rha DK, Lee WJ. Reconstruction of various perinasal defects using facial artery perforator-based nasolabial island flaps. Arch Plast Surg 2013;40:754-60. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.6.754