말소리와 음성과학 (Phonetics and Speech Sciences)

  • 제13권4호
  • /
  • Pages.55-66
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2005-8063(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-5854(eISSN)
한국음성학회 (Korean Society of Speech Sciences)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

읽기장애아동과 일반아동의 통사적 다양성에 따른 운율 특성 비교

A comparative study of prosodic features according to the syntactic diversities between children with reading disability and nondisabled children

  • 박성숙 (충남대학교 언어병리학과) ;
  • 성철재 (충남대학교 언어학과)
  • 투고 : 2021.09.05
  • 심사 : 2021.11.08
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

읽기와 관련된 운율은 내용의 전체적인 맥락에 연결되어 독자가 전달하고자 하는 의미를 자연스럽게 표현할 수 있도록 음도, 강도, 발화속도 등의 변화로 나타난다. 읽기장애아동은 자연스러운 운율을 사용한 읽기에 어려움이 있어 표현력 있게 정보를 전달하지 못하는 경향이 있다. 이와 관련하여 본 연구는 문장 유형에 따른 읽기 과제를 통하여 읽기장애아동 집단과 일반아동 집단 간의 운율 특성 차이를 규명하였다. 초등학교 3-6학년 읽기장애아동 15명, 일반아동 15명을 대상으로 통사적으로 다양한 문장 유형(단문, 의도, 가정/조건, 관형절 내포문)에 따른 읽기 과제를 실시하였다. 읽기장애아동은 일반아동에 비해 음도 범위가 넓었으며 읽기 속도와 조음 속도가 느렸다. 또한 휴지 빈도가 높았으며 전체 휴지 지속시간도 길었다. 읽기장애아동은 문미 억양구와 문장 내 어절 단위 음도 기울기에서 일반아동에 비해 기울기 값이 컸으며 이상의 내용은 모두 통계적으로 유의하였다. 결과적으로 문장 유형에 따른 읽기 과제에서 읽기장애아동은 일반아동에 비해 자연스럽고 표현력 있는 읽기에 어려움을 보였다. 본 연구를 통해 읽기장애아동의 운율 특성을 파악하였고, 효과적인 중재를 위한 접근 방법의 필요성을 제시했다.

Proper prosody in reading allows the reader to naturally convey the meaning, which manifests as changes in pitch, loudness, and speech rate. Children with reading disability face difficulty in delivering information due to poor prosody. This study identified the difference in prosodic features between children with reading disabilities and nondisabled children through means of reading tasks. Reading tasks, according to sentence types (short sentences, assumptions/conditions, intentions, relative-clause), were recorded by 15 children studying in the 3rd to 6th grade in elementary school. Children with reading disability had a statistically significant wider range of pitch, slower speech rate, more frequent usage of pauses, longer total pause duration, and steeper pitch slope than nondisabled one in sentence-final and -medial words. Children with reading disability, therefore, exhibited a less natural and expressive reading than nondisabled children. Through this study, the characteristics of prosody observed in children with reading disability were identified and the need for an approach for effective intervention was also suggested.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alves, L. M., Reis, C., & Pinheiro, A. (2015). Prosody and reading in dyslexic children. Dyslexia, 21(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1485
  2. An, B. (2010). Korean prosody and phonology. Seoul, Korea: Worin.
  3. Benjamin, R. G., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2010). Text complexity and oral reading prosody in young readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 388-404. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.4.2
  4. Butterworth, B. (1980). Evidence from pauses in speech. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (Vol. 1, pp. 155-176). London, UK: Academic Press.
  5. Carreker, S., Davis, R., Meisel, P., Spear-Swerling, L., & Wilson, B. (2009). Knowledge and practice standards for teachers of reading. Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.
  6. Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278-293. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
  7. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1986). An introduction to English prosody. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
  8. Cowie, R., Douglas-Cowie, E., & Wichmann, A. (2002). Prosodic characteristics of skilled reading: Fluency and expressiveness in 8-10-year-old readers. Language and Speech, 45(1), 47-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309020450010301
  9. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
  10. Groen, M. A., Veenendaal, N. J., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). The role of prosody in reading comprehension: Evidence from poor comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12133
  11. Hock, M., & Mellard, D. (2005). Reading comprehension strategies for adult literacy outcomes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(3), 192-200. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.3.3
  12. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799
  13. Jung, K. S., & Seong, C. J. (2007). A comparative study of the prosodic features between autism spectrum disorder and normal children in Korean read sentence. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 12(4), 625-642.
  14. Kim, G. E., & Chung, B. J. (2017). Morphological awareness of connective endings in first and second grade poor readers. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Disorders, 26(2), 77-88.
  15. Kim, S. H., & Jung, K. H. (2015). Morphological awareness and reading abilities for early elementary school students with poor reading skill. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 24(2), 35-47.
  16. Kim, S., Kim, M., Yoo, Y., & Kim, H. (2018). Syntax an analysis of 1st and 2nd grade elementary school Korean textbooks. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Disorders, 27(3), 97-105.
  17. Kim, W. S., Lee, S., Seo, J. H., Jeong, D. E., Cheon, J. M., & Choi, K. Y. (2015). An analysis of vocabulary in Korean elementary school textbooks. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Disorders, 24(4), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.15724/jslhd.2015.24.4.004
  18. Kim, Y. (2017). Instruction of reading and writing. Seoul, Korea: Hakjisa.
  19. Kim, Y. O., Byun, C. S., Kang, O. R., & Woo, J. H. (2014). A study on developing a "dyslexia screening checklist". Korea Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 99-128.
  20. Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310
  21. Koo, M. M., & Nam, K. C. (2007). Effects of name agreement and word frequency on the English-Korean word translation task, Malsori, 61, 31-48.
  22. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.3
  23. Lee, B. (2008). Korean grammar for speech-language pathologists. Seoul, Korea: Hakjisa.
  24. Mercer, C. D., & Mercer, A. R. (2001). Teaching students with learning problems (6th ed.). New York, NY: Merrill Publishing Co.
  25. Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). Prosody of syntactically complex sentences in the oral reading of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 839-853. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.839
  26. Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2008). A longitudinal study of the development of reading prosody as a dimension of oral reading fluency in early elementary school children. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(4), 336-354. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.4.2
  27. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2000). Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal readers and poor comprehenders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(2), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400002046
  28. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  29. Nippold, M. A. (2007). Later language development: School-age children, adolescents, and young adults. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
  30. Oh, J. (2014). A study of intonation curve slopes in Korean spontaneous speech. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 6(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2014.6.1.021
  31. Oh, S. Y., Seong, C. J., & Choi, E. A. (2011). The prosodic characteristics of children with cochlear implants with respect to speech rate and intonation slope. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 3(3), 157-165.
  32. Pae, S. Y., Kim, M. B., & Jung, K. H. (2012). Grammatical morphemes of school-aged Korean children with or without poor reading. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 21(1), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.15724/jslhd.2012.21.1.002
  33. Park, J., Park, H., & Sim, H. (2019). Prosodic features in the oral reading of lower-grade elementary school children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Special Education Research, 18(2), 111-134.
  34. Rasinski, T., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 350-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070802468715
  35. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Hamilton, A. M., Kuhn, M. R., Wisenbaker, J. M., & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Becoming a fluent reader: Reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.119
  36. Smith, A. B., Roberts, J., Smith, S. L., Locke, J. L., & Bennett, J. (2006). Reduced speaking rate as an early predictor of reading disability. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 15(3), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2006/027)
  37. Zvonik, E., & Cummins, F. (2003, September). The effect of surrounding phrase lengths on pause duration. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology(Eurospeech 2003) (pp. 777-780).