DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of pregnancy-associated glycoprotein profile in milk for early pregnancy diagnosis in goats

  • Singh, Shiva Pratap (Animal Physiology and Reproduction Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Institute for Research on Goats) ;
  • Natesan, Ramachandran (Animal Physiology and Reproduction Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Institute for Research on Goats) ;
  • Sharma, Nandini (Animal Physiology and Reproduction Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Institute for Research on Goats) ;
  • Goel, Anil Kumar (Animal Physiology and Reproduction Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Institute for Research on Goats) ;
  • Singh, Manoj Kumar (Animal Genetics and Breeding Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Institute for Research on Goats) ;
  • Kharche, Suresh Dinkar (Animal Physiology and Reproduction Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Institute for Research on Goats)
  • Received : 2019.05.16
  • Accepted : 2019.12.24
  • Published : 2021.01.01

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to assess the level of pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) in whole and skim milk samples, and its suitability for early pregnancy diagnosis in goats. Methods: A two-step sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system for estimation of milk PAG was developed and validated, which employed caprine-PAG specific polyclonal antisera. Whole and skim milk samples (n = 210 each) from fifteen multiparous goats were collected on alternate days from d 10 to d 30, and thereafter weekly till d 51 post-mating. PAG levels in milk samples were estimated by ELISA and the pregnancies were confirmed at d40 post-mating by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Results: The level of PAG in whole and skim milk samples of both pregnant and nonpregnant goats remained below the threshold values until d 24 after mating. Thereafter, PAG concentration in whole and skim milk increased steadily in pregnant goats, whereas it continued below the threshold in non-pregnant does. The PAG profiles in whole and skim milk of pregnant goats were almost similar and exhibited strong positive relationship (r = 0.891; p<0.001). Day 26 post-mating was identified as the first time-point for significantly (p<0.05) higher milk PAG concentration in pregnant goats than to non-pregnant goats. When compared to TRUS examination for pregnancy diagnosis, the accuracy and specificity of PAG ELISA using whole and skim milk samples were 94.5% and 95.4%; and 95.3% and 100%, respectively. The high values of area-under-curve (0.904 [whole milk] and 0.922 [skim milk]), demonstrate outstanding discrimination ability of the milk assays. Among the sampling dates chosen, d 37 post-mating was identified as the best suitable time point for collection of milk samples to detect pregnancy in goats. Conclusion: The PAG concentration in whole and skim milk of goats collected between days 26 and 51 post-breeding can be used for the accurate prediction of pregnancy and may be useful for assisting management decisions in goat flocks.

Keywords

References

  1. Martinez MF, Bosch P, Bosch RA. Determination of early pregnancy and embryonic growth in goats by transrectal ultrasound scanning. Theriogenology 1998;49:1555-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00101-0
  2. Fricke PM. Scanning the future-Ultrasonography as a reproductive management tool for dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2002;85:1918-26. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74268-9
  3. Karen A, Sousa NM, Beckers JF, et al. Comparison of a commercial bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein ELISA test and a pregnancy-associated glycoprotein radiomimmunoassay test for early pregnancy diagnosis in dairy cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2015;159:31-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.05.005
  4. Ricci A, Carvalho PD, Amundson MC, Fourdraine RH, Vincenti L, Fricke PM. Factors associated with pregnancyassociated glycoprotein (PAG) levels in plasma and milk of Holstein cows during early pregnancy and their effect on the accuracy of pregnancy diagnosis. J Dairy Sci 2015;98:2502-14. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8974
  5. Commun L, Velek K, Barbry JB, et al. Detection of pregnancyassociated glycoproteins in milk and blood as a test for early pregnancy in dairy cows. J Vet Diagn Invest 2016;28:207-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638716632815
  6. El Amiri B, Sousa NM, Alvarez-Oxiley A, Hadarbach D, Beckers JF. Pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) concentration in plasma and milk samples for early pregnancy diagnosis in Lacaune dairy sheep. Res Vet Sci 2015;99:30-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.12.016
  7. Green JA, Xie S, Roberts RM. Pepsin-related molecules secreted by trophoblast. Rev Reprod 1998;3:62-9. https://doi.org/10.1530/revreprod/3.1.62
  8. Green JA, Parks TE, Avalle MP, et al. The establishment of an ELISA for the detection of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAGs) in the serum of pregnant cows and heifers. Theriogenology 2005;63:1481-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.07.011
  9. de Sousa NM, Garbayo JM, Figueiredo JR, Sulon J, Goncalves PBD, Beckers JF. Pregnancy-associated glycoprotein and progesterone profiles during pregnancy and postpartum in native goats from the north-east of Brazil. Small Rumin Res 1999;32:137-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(98)00171-0
  10. Shahin M, Friedrich M, Gauly M, Beckers JF, Holtz W. Pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) pattern and pregnancy detection in Boer goats using an ELISA with different antisera. Small Rumin Res 2013;113:141-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.01.016
  11. Schams D, Karg H. Hormones in milk. Ann NY Acad Sci 1986;464:75-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb15995.x
  12. Friedrich M, Holtz W. Establishment of an ELISA for measuring bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein in serum or milk and its application for early pregnancy detection. Reprod Domest Anim 2010;45:142-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01287.x
  13. Lawson BC, Shahzad AH, Dolecheck KA, et al. A pregnancy detection assay using milk samples: evaluation and considerations. J Dairy Sci 2014;97:6316-25. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8233
  14. Rainard P. Consequences of interference of milk with chemoattractants for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay quantifications. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2010;17:848-52. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00447-09
  15. Goel AK, Khrache SD, Jindal SK. Determination of early pregnancy and embryonic development by transrectal ultra-sonography in goats. Indian J Anim Sci 2009;79:476-8.
  16. Barbato O, de Sousa NM, Debenedatt A, Canali C, Todini L, Beckers JF. Validation of a new pregnancy-associated glycoprotein radioimmunoassay method for the detection of early pregnancy in ewes. Theriogenology 2009;72:993-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.06.020
  17. Singh SP, Ramachandran N, Sharma N, et al. Relationship of foetal number and parity in Barbari goats to plasma profile of caprine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (caPAG) during gestation and the early postpartum period. Anim Reprod Sci 2019;210:106190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106190
  18. Zou KH, O'Malley AJ, Mauri L. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models. Circulation 2007;115:654-7. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594929
  19. Martin SW, Meek AH, Willeberg P. Veterinary epidemiology: principles and methods. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press; 1987. pp. 63-71.
  20. Haldar A, Pal SK, Chakraborty S, et al. Endocrine markers for identifying prolificacy potential and predicting fetal number in goats. Anim Reprod Sci 2013;140:54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.05.005
  21. Ayogu CJ, Madukwe MC, Yekinni OT. Application of discriminant function analysis in agricultural extension research. In: Madukwe MC, Igbokwe EM, Garforth CJ, Dube MA, editors. A guide to research in agricultural extension. 2nd ed. Agricultural Extension Society of Nigeria; 2014. p. 117-46.
  22. Roberts JN, Byrem TM, Grooms DL. Application of an ELISA milk pregnancy test in beef cows. Reprod Domest Anim 2015;50:651-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12546
  23. LeBlanc SJ. Short communication: Field evaluation of a pregnancy confirmation test using milk samples in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:2345-8. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6414
  24. Chavez NA, Jauregui J, Palomares LA, Macias KE, Jimenez M, Salinas E. A highly sensitive sandwich ELISA for the determination of glycomacropeptide to detect liquid whey in raw milk. Dairy Sci Technol 2012;92:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13594-011-0052-3
  25. Yamanaka H, Konno S, Sato T, Kaneko K. Relative concentrations of progesterone and estradiol-17β in blood serum, whole milk, skimmed milk and milk whey of Holstein cows. Vet Rec 2007;160:339-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.160.10.339
  26. Gonzalez F, Sulon J, Calero P, Batista M, Gracia A, Beckers JF. Pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAG) detection in milk samples for pregnancy diagnosis in dairy goats. Theriogenology 2001;56:671-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00598-2
  27. Roberts JN, May KJ, Veiga-Lopez A. Time-dependent changes in pregnancy-associated glycoproteins and progesterone in commercial crossbred sheep. Theriogenology 2017;89:271-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.10.029
  28. Patel S, Bhavsar CD. Analysis of pharmacokinetic data by wilk's lambda (An important tool of manova). Int J Pharm Sci Invent 2013;2:36-44. http://www.ijpsi.org/VOl(2)1/Version_3/G0213644.pdf
  29. Ali M. Bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein in biological fluids [Ph.D. Thesis]. Aberdeen, UK: University of Aberdeen; 1999.
  30. Reese ST, Pereira MHC, Edwards JL, Vasconcelos JLM, Pohler KG. Pregnancy diagnosis in cattle using pregnancy associated glycoprotein concentration in circulation at day 24 of gestation. Theriogenology 2018;106:178-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.10.020

Cited by

  1. Pregnancy-associated glycoproteins as a potential marker for diagnosis of early pregnancy in goats: A scoping reviewing vol.9, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4103/2305-0500.298772