DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Calculation of Soil Carbon Changes by Administrative District with Regard to Land Cover Changes

토지피복변화에 따른 행정구역별 토양 탄소 변화량 산정

  • Choo, Innkyo (Department of Advanced Science and Technology Convergence, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Seong, Yeonjeong (Department of Advanced Science and Technology Convergence, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Shiksha, Bastola (Department of Advanced Science and Technology Convergence, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jung, Younghun (Department of Disaster Prevention and Environmental Engineering, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2021.02.08
  • Accepted : 2021.02.25
  • Published : 2021.03.01

Abstract

This study aimed to calculate the amount of change in soil carbon due to changes in land cover. Among the various soil carbon models, the InVEST Carbon Storage and Sequestration module was used. LULC is one of the leading factors affecting soil carbon. Therefore, this study compared the total amount of soil carbon due to changes in LULC in 2000 and 2010 across the Republic of Korea, and calculated the changes in each administrative district (city). Changes in LULC in Korea were mainly due to the increase in developed and dry areas and the decrease in grassland, indicating changes in soil carbon. The total amount of soil carbon changes in South Korea has been reduced by 11.48 (millions) in 10 years. The amount of soil carbon by administrative region decreased in most cities and provinces, but Jeju Island, in exception, showed an increase in soil carbon. Among the cities and provinces except Jeju Island, Seoul showed the smallest decrease, with a decrease of 0.033 (million t). On the contrary, the largest number of attempts to decrease was to Gyeongsangbuk-do, which saw a total decrease of 2.893 (million t). Jeju Island is the only soil carbon-increasing area with an increase of 0.547 (millions) and the agricultural area has increased 2.1 times in 10 years. In the case of soil carbon, the construction of ground observation data at the national unit is insufficient, and verification will need to be carried out through linked analysis using multiple models in the future.

본 연구는 토지피복의 변화에 따른 토양 탄소의 변화량을 산정하고자 하였다. 다양한 토양탄소 모형가운데 InVEST Carbon Storage and Sequestration 모듈을 사용하였다. 토지피복은 토양 탄소에 영향을 주는 대표적인 인자 중 하나이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 대한민국 전역을 대상으로 2000년과 2010년의 토지피복 변화에 따른 토양 탄소의 총량을 비교하였으며, 각 행정구역별(시도)의 변화량을 산정하였다. 대한민국의 토지피복 변화는 주로 시가 및 건조지역의 증가와 초지의 감소 등으로 나타났으며, 이로 인한 토양 탄소의 변화를 나타냈다. 대한민국의 총 토양 탄소 변화량은 10년 사이 11.48(million t) 감소한 것으로 나타났다. 행정구역별 토양탄소량은 대부분의 시도에서 감소를 나타냈으나, 예외적으로 제주도는 토양탄소량이 증가한 것으로 나타났다. 제주도를 제외한 시도 중 감소량이 제일 적은 시도는 서울로 나타났으며, 감소량은 0.033(million t)으로 나타났다. 반대로 가장 많은 감소량을 보인 시도는 경북으로 총 2.893(million t)이 감소하였다. 제주도는 유일한 총 토양 탄소 증가 지역으로 0.547(million t)이 증가하였으며, 10년 사이 농업지역이 2.1배 증가함을 보였다. 토양탄소의 경우 전국단위의 실측 자료 구축이 부족함을 보이며, 추후 다중 모형을 이용하여 연계분석을 통해 검증을 진행해야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김동엽, 이창환 (2005), 토양탄소의 저장과 지구온난화 방지, Report 2005-12, 한국과학기술정보연구원, pp. 3-8.
  2. 김충기, 황상일, 안소은, 이현우, 윤정호, 명수정, 홍현정, 김윤정, 이지민, 천정윤, 박윤선, 김시진, 이현규, 김강선, 김도균 (2018), 생태계서비스 평가 및 지도구축 시범사업 I, 환경부.
  3. Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy (2018), Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative - Measurement of Soil Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Systems) Methodology Determination 2018, Authorised Version F2018L00089.
  4. Bastola, S., Lim, K. J., Yang, J. E., Shin, Y. C. and Jung, Y. H. (2019), Landuse and landcover change and the impacts on soil carbon storage on the Bagmati Basin of Nepal, Journal of Korean Geo-Environmental Society, Vol. 20, No. 12, pp. 33-39. https://doi.org/10.14481/jkges.2019.20.12.33
  5. Bastola, S., Lee, S. H., Shin, Y. C. and Jung, Y. H. (2020), An assessment of environmental impacts on the ecosystem services: study on the bagmati basin of Nepal, Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 19, 8186. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198186
  6. Choi, J. Y. and Lee, S. D. (2020), Change of carbon fixation and economic assessment according to the implementation of the sunset provision, Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 126-133 (In Korean).
  7. Falloon, P., Smith, P., Bradley, R. I., Milne, R., Tomlinson, R., Viner, D., Livermore, M. and Brown, T. (2006), RothCUK - a dynamic modelling system for estimating changes in soil C form mineral soils at 1-km resolution in the UK.
  8. Kwon, S. S., Choi, S. H. and Lee, S. D. (2012), Estimation of spatial-temporal net primary productivity and soil carbon storage change in the capital area of South Korea under climate change, Environmental Impact Assessment, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 757-765.
  9. LI, K., Wang, S. and Cao, M. (2004), Vegetation and soil carbon storage in China, Science in China Ser. D Earth Sciences 2004, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1360/02yd0029
  10. Lee, C. H., Kwak, S. Y., Kim, C. K., Bae, H. J., Suh, Y. W., Ahn, S. E., Kang, W. M., Kim, G. E. and Shin, J. W. (2016), An integrated approach to environmental valuation, 2016-00, Korea Environment Institute, pp. 22-51 (In Korean).
  11. Lee, T. H., Kim, S. W., Shin, Y. C., Jung, Y. H., Lim, K. J., Yang, J. E. and Jang, W. S. (2019), Development of soil organic carbon storage estimation model using soil characteristics, Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, Vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 1-8 (In Korean).
  12. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. (2020), 2050 Netzero, https://www.korea.kr/special/policyCurationView.do?newsld=148881562#7
  13. Park, H. J., Shin, H. S., Roh, Y. H., Kim, K. M. and Park, K. H. (2012), Estimating forest carbon stocks in danyang using kriging methods for aboveground biomass, Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 16-33 (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2012.15.1.016
  14. Roh, Y. H., Kim, C. K. and Hong, H. J. (2016), Time-series changes to ecosystem regulating services in Jeju : focusing on estimating carbon sequestration and evaluating economic feasibility, Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 29-44 (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2016.24.2.29
  15. Sharp, R., Tallis, H. T., Ricketts, T., Guerry, A. D., Wood, S. A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Nelson, E., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., Olwero, N., Vigerstol, K., Pennington, D., Mendoza, G., Aukema, J., Foster, J., Forrest, J., Cameron, D., Arkema, K., Lonsdorf, E., Kennedy, C., Verutes, G., Kim, C. K., Guannel, G., Papenfus, M., Toft, J., Marsik, M., Bernhardt, J., Griffin, R., Glowinski, K., Chaumont, N., Perelman, A., Lacayo, M., Mandle, L., Hamel, P., Vogl, A. L., Rogers, L., Bierbower, W., Denu, D. and Douglass, J. (2018), InVEST +VERSION+ User's Guide, The Natural Capital Projext, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund.
  16. Son, Y. W. and Lee, S. H. (2001), Relationship between landuse change and soil carbon and nitrogen, Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 242-248 (In Korean).
  17. Tallis, H. and Polasky, S. (2009), Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and naturalresource management, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1162, No. 1, pp. 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x
  18. Wiesmeier, M., Urbanski, L., Hobley, E., Lang, B., von Lutzow, M., Marin-Spiotta, E., van Wesemael, B., Rabot, E., LieB, M., Garcia-Franco, N., Wollschlager, U., Vogel, H. J. and KogelKnabner, I. (2019), Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils - A review of drivers and indicators at various scales, Journal of Geoderma, Vol. 333, No. 1, pp. 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.026