DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Correction Factors of Soil Non-linearity Considering Korean Regional Conditions for Seismic Deformation Method Applied to Multi-Utility Tunnels

공동구의 응답변위법 해석 시 국내 특성을 반영한 지반 비선형 보정계수 연구

  • Choi, Jeong Ho (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University) ;
  • Yun, Jong Seok (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University) ;
  • Choo, Yun Wook (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University) ;
  • Youn, Jun Ung (National Center for Seismic Safety, KISTEC)
  • 최정호 (공주대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 윤종석 (공주대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 추연욱 (공주대학교 건설환경공학부) ;
  • 윤준웅 (한국시설안전공단 국가내진센터)
  • Received : 2020.09.04
  • Accepted : 2020.11.04
  • Published : 2021.01.01

Abstract

The seismic deformation method is conventionally used as a seismic design for a multi-utility tunnel in Korea. In the seismic deformation method, the soil ground's natural period is one of the most critical factors for calculating the ground displacement using cosine functions. Correction factors for the natural period and shear wave velocity have been used to consider the non-linearity of dynamic soil properties. However, the correction factors have been issued because the correction factors have not been sufficiently studied to consider Korea's regional conditions. This paper aims to evaluate the natural periods for the seismic deformation method considering Korea's ground conditions. Ground response analysis was performed using seven real earthquake records on twelve sites with different soil conditions where actual multi-utility tunnels are installed. As a result, natural periods of the sites were analyzed and new correction factors were proposed according to seismic performance and Korea's regional conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT). Design Code for Multi-utility Tunnel : Seismic Design. (KDS 11 44 00). Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea. c2018.
  2. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT). Guidelines for Seismic Performance Evaluations of Existing Structures (Multi-utility Tunnel). Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea. c2020.
  3. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT). Guidelines for Seismic Performance Evaluations of Existing Structures(Tunnel). Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea. c2020.
  4. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT). Design Code for Tunnel : Seismic Design. (KDS 27 17 00). Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea. c2018.
  5. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT). Seismic Design Standard for Urban Railway. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea. c2016.
  6. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT). Guidelines for Seismic design of Existing Structures (Water Supply Facilities). (KDS 57 17 00). Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea. c2019.
  7. Japan Road Association (JARA). Guidelines for Oil Pipeline Technology. Japan Road Association, Japan. c1974.
  8. Kim JM, Kim DA. A Study on Conservativeness of Seismic Deformation Method for Earthquake Analysis of Underground Structures. Journal of Korea Concrete Institute. 2009 Nov;117-118.
  9. Kim MC, Kim YI, Cho WY, Kim MK, Modification of Response Displacement Method for Seismic Design of Underground Structures under Domestic Conditions. EESK J. Earthquake Eng. 2004 Apr; 8(2):83-93.
  10. Lee BR, Shin YJ, Kim SK, Park JH. Site-Natural-Period and Seismic Shear Stress on the Double Cosine Method, EESK J. Earthquake Eng. 2009 Mar;105-112.
  11. Yoon JK, Kim DS, You JN. Evaluations of Velocity Response Spectrum of Seismic Base and Response Displacement for the Seismic Design of Underground Structures. Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society. 2003 Aug;19(4):211-221.
  12. Kim MK, Kwak CH, Kim JS, Cho KH. Ground Displacement Evaluation of Response Displacement Method for Seismic Design of Utility Tunnel. Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 2004 Oct;3015-3020.
  13. Choo YW, Park IJ, Lee JS, Kim SR, Lee YK. A Study on the Guidelines for Seismic Performance Evaluations of Existing Structures (Multi-utility Tunnel, Tunnel, Foundation and Ground). Proceedings of EESK Conference. Jeju, Korea. 2019 Sep;127-128.
  14. Kim JM, Lim JS. Discussion on Seismic Response Analysis Method of Multi-utility Tunnel. Proceedings of EESK Conference. Jeju, Korea. 2019 Sep.
  15. Japan Road Association (JARA). Guidelines for Seismic Design of Multi-utility Tunnel. Japan Road Association, Japan. c1986.
  16. Japan Road Association (JARA). Guidelines for Seismic Design & Construction of Parking Lots. Japan Road Association, Japan. c1993.
  17. Japan Water Works Association (JWWA). Guidelines for Seismic Design of Water Facilities. Japan Water Works Association, Japan. c2009.
  18. The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF). Guidelines for Seismic design of Land Improvement Construction. The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan. c2015.
  19. Hashash, YMA, Musgrove MI, Harmon JA, Groholski DR, Phillips CA, Park D. DEEPSOIL 7.0.User Manual. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Urbana. IL. c2017.
  20. Geotechnical Information DB system, Available from: http://www.geoinfo.or.kr.
  21. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT). General Seismic Design (KDS 17 10 00). Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea. c2018.
  22. Seismosoft : Seismosoft Earthquake Engineering Software Solutions : Seismosoft. 2019, Nov 5 Available from : https://seismosoft.com/.
  23. Al Atik L, Abrahamson N. An Improved Method for Nonstationary Spectral Matching. Earthquake Spectra, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 2010 Aug;26(3):601-617. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3459159
  24. Kim DS, Choo YW. Dynamic Deformation Characteristics of Cohesionless Soils in Korea Using Resonant Column Tests. Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society. 2001 Oct;17(5):115-128.
  25. Vucetic M, Dobry R. Effect of Soil Plasticity on Cyclic Response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 1991 Jan;117(1):89-107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89)
  26. Seed HB, Idriss IM. Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Response Analysis. Report No. EERC 70-10. Earthquake Engineering Resource Center. University of California, Berkley, California. c1970.
  27. Rollins KM, Evans MD, Diehl NB, Daily III WD. Shear Modulus and Damping Relationships for Gravels. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 1998 May;124(5):396-405. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:5(396)
  28. Schnabel PB, Seed HB. Accelerations in Rock for Earthquakes in the Western United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1973;63(2):501-516.
  29. Sun CG, Chung CK, Kim DS. A Proposition of Site Coefficients and Site Classification System for Design Ground Motions at Inland of the Korean Peninsula. Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society. 2005;21(6):101-115.
  30. Sun CG, Han JT, Cho WJ. Representative Shear Wave Velocity of Geotechnical Layers by Synthesizing In-situ Seismic Test Data in Korea. Journal of Engineering Geology. 2012;22(3):293-307. https://doi.org/10.9720/kseg.2012.3.293
  31. Sun CG, Yang DS, Chung CK. Evaluation of Site-Specific Amplification Characteristics in Plains of Seoul Metropolitan Area. EESK J. Earthquake Eng. 2005;9(4):29-42.