DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigating the Characteristics of Academia-Industrial Cooperation-based Patents for their Long-term Use

지속적 활용이 가능한 산학협력 특허 특성 분석

  • Park, Sang-Young (Department of Industrial Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Choi, Youngjae (Department of Artificial Intelligence, Ajou University) ;
  • Lee, Sungjoo (Department of Industrial Engineering, Ajou University)
  • 박상영 (아주대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 최영재 (아주대학교 인공지능학과) ;
  • 이성주 (아주대학교 산업공학과)
  • Received : 2020.12.08
  • Accepted : 2021.03.05
  • Published : 2021.03.31

Abstract

Patents that are research results from industry-university cooperation (IUC) are a source of innovation, and play an important role in economic growth, such as technology transfer and commercialization. For this reason, there are many efforts to revitalize IUC, but in general, company patents are achievements that can be commercialized, rather than research achievements, so not all patents are used for business, even after their creation as the outcome of IUC. Therefore, this research supports the design of measures in which IUC can ultimately be linked to successful utilization of patents by identifying the purposes of IUC, even after it has been successfully promoted, and patents have been filed as a result. To this end, first, the patents registered for industry-academia cooperation in the United States are collected, and second, a predictive model is designed, with unexpired and expired patents predicted using machine learning techniques. The final identified patents are intended to derive available factors in terms of marketability and technicality. This study is expected to help predict the utilization of unexpired and expired patents, and is expected to contribute to setting goals for research results from technical cooperation between corporate and university officials planning early IUC.

산학협력 성과물 중 하나인 특허는 혁신의 원천이자 기술이전 및 기술사업화를 통한 경제성장에 중요한 역할을 하고 매개체이다. 그러나 산학협력이 궁극적으로 기업이 원하는 결과를 창출하기 위해서는 산학협력의 성과물인 특허가 사업에 활용되어야 함에도 모든 특허가 사업에 활용되는 것은 아니다. 본 연구에서는 산학협력이 성공적으로 추진되어 그 성과물로 특허가 창출된 이후에도, 사업화로 연계되지 못하는 경우에 대해 그 원인을 파악하여 산학협력이 궁극적으로 성공적인 사업화로 연계될 수 있는 방안을 설계할 수 있도록 지원한다. 이를 위해 첫째 미국의 산학협력 등록특허를 수집하고, 둘째 머신러닝 기법으로 활용 특허와 미활용 특허를 분류할 수 있는 예측모형을 설계하였다. 최종적으로 식별된 특허들의 시장성과 기술성을 분석하여 두 유형의 특허에 있어 유의미한 차이점을 도출하고자 하였다. 본 연구는 학술적으로 활용 및 미활용 특허의 예측 연구의 기반이 될 것이며, 실무적으로는 산학협력을 기획하는 기업 및 대학 담당자가 기술협력을 위한 전략수립에 기여할 것으로 기대 된다.

Keywords

References

  1. P.-H. Soh, A. M. Subramanian, "When do firms benefit from university-industry R&D collaborations? The implications of firm R&D focus on scientific research and technological recombination", Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 29, No 6, pp.807-821, Nov 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.11.001
  2. E. Mansfield, J. -Y. Lee, "The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recepient of industrial suppor", Research Policy, Vol 25, No 7, pp.1047-1058, Aug 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00893-1
  3. C.H. Kim, S. D. Lee, "A Study on Relationships between Performance of University-Industry Cooperations and Competency Factors of University", Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 10, No 2, pp. 629-653, Jun 2007.
  4. S. Lechevalier, Y. Ikeda, J. Nishimura, "Investigating Collaborative R&D Using Patent Data: The Case Study of Robot Technology in Japan", Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol 32, pp.305-323, Jun 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1536
  5. I. H. Jang, "Current Status and Implications of Government R&D Patent Management", Technical report, Korea institute of intellectual property, Korea, pp.3-4.
  6. J. H. Lee, J. W. Kim, "Text Mining and Social Network Analysis-based Patent Analysis Method for Improving Collaboration and Technology Transfer between University and Industry", Society for e-Business Studies, Vol.22, No.3, pp.1-28, Aug.2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2017.22.3.001
  7. Y. J. Yoon, D. S. Park, "The Impact of the University"s Capacity for the Industry-Academia Collaboration on the Performance of Technology Commercialization", Journal of Social Science, Vol 26, No 3, pp.157-177, Jul 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16881/jss.2015.07.26.3.157
  8. R. W. Smilor, G. B. Dietrich, D. V. Gibson, "The entrepreneurial university: The role of higher education in the United States in technology commercialization and economic development", International Social Science Journal, Vol 45, No 1, pp.1-11, 1993.
  9. J. Powers, "Commercializing academic research: Resource effects on performance of university technology transfer", Journal of Higher Education, Vol 74, No 1, pp.26-50, Feb 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2003.11777186
  10. R. Frietsch, H. Grupp, "There is a new man in town: the paradigm shift in optical technology", Technovation, Vol 26, No 1, pp.463-472, Jan 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.007
  11. P. Hanel, "Intellectual property rights and business management practices: A survey of the literature", Technovation, Vol 26, No 8, pp.895-931, Aug 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.12.001
  12. H. Etemad, Y. Lee, "The inherent complexities of revealed technological advantage as an index of cumulative technological specialization", Proceedings of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, pp. 22-37, 1999.
  13. M. Trajtenberg, R. Henderson, A. Jaffe, "'University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Invention'", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol 5, No 1, pp.19-50, May 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599700000006
  14. E. Bacchiocchi, F. Montobbio, "Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations", J Technol Transf, Vol 34, pp.169-181, Nov 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9070-y
  15. J. H. Suh, "Empirical Analysis of University Patenting in Korea", Korea Development Institute, Vol 32, No 4, pp.1-38, Dec 2010.
  16. L. Peters, P. Groenewegen, N. Fiebelkorn, "A comparison of networks between industry and public sector research in materials technology and biotechnology", Research Policy, Vol 27, No 3, pp.255-271, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00040-7
  17. H. S. Yoo, "A Study on Status Analysis and Enhancing the Utilization of the Unused Patents in Universities and Public Research Institutes", Technical report, Korea institute of S&T evaluation and planning, Korea, pp.47-60.
  18. D. S. Won, "The Cause of Unutilized Patents and Suggestions for Improving the Utilization Rate of Universities and Public Performance", Technical report, Intellectual Property Policy, Korea, pp.1-8.
  19. J. H. Yoon, "A Model for Valuation of Value Realization through the Trading of Patent Rights", Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol 25, No 1, pp.42-46, Mar 2018.
  20. H. Y. Noh, "Technology intelligence to predict a patent's citation frequency, essentiality, and transferability : An integrated use of deep-learning, censored regression and logistic regressions", Ajou Univ., pp.33-35, Dec 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1536
  21. M. R. Kim, Y. J. Geum, "Prediction of patent right transfer information using machine learning techniques", Korean Institute Of Industrial Engineers, pp.1523-1539, Nov 2018.
  22. T. E. Sung, D. S. Kim, J.-M. Jang, H.-W. Park, "An Empirical Analysis on Determinant Factors of Patent Valuation and Technology Transaction Prices", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol 19, No 2, pp.254-279, Jun 2016.
  23. A. Liaw, M. Wiener, "Classification and regression by random Forest", Researchgate.net, Vol 2, No 3, pp.18-22, Dec 2002.
  24. J.A.K. Suykens, J. Vandewalle, "Least squares support vector machine classifiers", Neural Process Lett, Vol 9, No 3, pp.293-300, Jun 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018628609742
  25. W. Wang, B. Xu, J. Liu, Z. Cui, S. Yu, X. Kong, F. Xia, "Csteller: Forecasting scientific collaboration sustainability based on extreme gradient boosting", World Wide Web, pp.1-22, Jul 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-019-00703-y
  26. G. Kim, J. Bae, "A novel approach to forecast promising technology through patent analysis", Technol Forecast Soc Chang, Vol 117, pp. 228-237, Apr 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.023
  27. J.E. Fischer, L.M. Bachmann, R. Jaeschke, "A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis", Intensive Care Med, Vol 29, pp.1043-1051, May 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1761-8
  28. D. Harhoff, F. M. Scherer, K. Vopel, "Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights", Research Policy, Vol 32, No 8, pp.1343-1363, Sep 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5
  29. S. Scotchmer, "Patents in the University: Priming the Pump and Crowding Out", The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol 61, No 3, pp.817-844, Sep 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12023
  30. H.N. Su, P.C. Lee, C.M.L. Chen, C. H. Chiu "Assessing the values of global patents", Proceedings of Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, pp.966-974, Sep 2012.
  31. M. Trajtenberg, "A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations", The Rand Journal of Economics, Vol 21, No 1, pp.172-187, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2555502
  32. X. Tong, J. Frame, "Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data", Research Policy, Vol 23, No 2, pp.133-141. Mar 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)90050-7