DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation on the Gait Ability of Stroke Patients with Hemiplegia: A Mixed Methods Research Study

보행로봇 재활치료가 편마비 뇌졸중 환자의 보행능력에 미치는 효과: 혼합연구설계

  • Received : 2021.01.14
  • Accepted : 2021.02.24
  • Published : 2021.02.28

Abstract

Purpose: This study used a mixed methods research design in an attempt to verify the effects of robot-assisted rehabilitation on the gait ability of stroke patients with hemiplegia, and thereby further understand the benefits and challenges of stroke patients' experiences relying on robot-assisted rehabilitation. Methods: An exploratory sequential mixed methods study design was used in order to combine both quantitative and qualitative data. For the quantitative data collection, a total of 30 stroke patients with hemiplegia were recruited from one rehabilitation hospital. Qualitative data were collected through individual interviews using semi-structured questionnaires for a group of 15 patients who were currently undergoing robot-assisted rehabilitation. The data were analyzed through qualitative content analysis. Results: As a result of the quantitative analysis, there were significant differences between the two groups in terms of daily living activity patterns, total number of steps, and average walking speed. As a result of the qualitative analysis, the four main themes derived consisted of, 'curiosity about the usage of robot-assisted rehabilitation,' 'pleasure experienced while using the robots,' 'insufficient information about robots,' and 'a lack of education about robot-assisted rehabilitation.' Conclusions: Robot-assisted rehabilitation had a significant effect on the walking ability of stroke patients with hemiplegia. Additionally, stroke patients with hemiplegia experienced difficulty during the course of their robot-assisted rehabilitation, due to a lack of sufficient information on correct usage techniques. These quantitative and qualitative findings could provide the basic foundation for the development of an educational program on robot-assisted rehabilitation.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwon SU. Stroke story [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Stroke Society; 2011 [cited 2020 Oct 25] Available from: https://www.stroke.or.kr:4454/stroke/index.html
  2. Kim TU. Healthcare big data [Internet]. Gangwon: Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service; 2015 [cited 2020 Oct 30]. Available from: https://www.opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/olapMfrnIntrsIlnsInfo.do
  3. Perna R, Temple J. Rehabilitation outcomes: ischemic versus hemorrhagic strokes. Behavioural Neurology. 2015;1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/891651
  4. Pennycott A, Wyss D, Vallery H, Klamroth MV, Riener R. Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation. 2012;9(1):1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-65
  5. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine. Rehabilitation of stroke patients [Internet]. Seoul; Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2011. [cited 2020 Oct 30]. Available from: https://www.karm.or.kr/info/disease01.php
  6. Balaban B, Tok F. Gait disturbances in patients with stroke. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014;6(7):635-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.6.7.635
  7. Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2000;81(4):409-417. https://doi.org/10.1053/mr.2000.3839
  8. Tomida K, Sonoda S, Hirano S, Suzuki A, Tanino G, Kawakami K et al. Randomized controlled trial of gait training using gait exercise assist robot (GEAR) in stroke patients with hemiplegia. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2019;28(9):2421-2428. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.06.030
  9. Mirelman A, Bonato P, Deutsch JE. Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke. Stroke. 2009;40(1):169-174. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.516328/Stroke.2009.40.1.169
  10. Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M., Elsner B. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017;(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub4
  11. Chua J, Culpan J, Menon E. Efficacy of an electromechanical gait trainer posts stroke in singapore: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2016;97(5):683-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.025
  12. Kim JH. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on lower limb in patients with subacute stroke. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 2016;17(7):459-466. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.7.459
  13. Kim JY, Kim DY, Chun MH, Kim SW, Jeon HR, Hwang CH, et al. Effects of robot-(Morning Walk®) assisted gait training for patients after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2019;33(3):516-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518806563
  14. Ham SC, Chae GL. The effects of robot assisted gait training with visual feedback on gait, balance and balance confidence in chronic stroke patients. The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy. 2016;28(2):71-76. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.2.71
  15. Kwon SC, Shin WS. Comparison of robotic tilt-table training and body weight support treadmill training on lower extremity strength, balance, gait, and satisfaction with rehabilitation in patients with subacute stroke. Journal of The Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2020;15(4):163-174. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2020.15.4.163
  16. Lee J, Kim BR. Role of intensity and repetition in rehabilitation therapy. Brain Neurorehabilitation. 2012;5(1);6-11. https://doi.org/10.127.12786/bn.2012.5.1.6
  17. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index: a simple index of independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically il. Maryland State Medical Journal. 1965;14:61-65.
  18. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1989;42(8):703-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6
  19. Elo S, Kyhgas H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;26(1):107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  20. Sandelowski M. The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science. 1986; 8(3):27-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005
  21. Lee D. Effects of visual feedback treadmill gait training program combined with virtual reality technology and a force plate measurement system on gait ability and quality of life in stroke patients. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association. 2020;14(3):363-373. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2020.1.14.3.363
  22. Poil P, Moronr G, Rosati G, Masiero S. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for stroke patient's therapy. BioMed Research International. 2013; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/153872
  23. Mayr A, Kofler M, Quirbach E, Matzak H, Frohlich K, Saltuari L. Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2007;21(4): 307-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307300697/NNR.2007.21.4.307
  24. Bang DH, Shin SW. Effects of robot-assisted gait training on spatiotemporal gait parameters and balance in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016;38(4):343-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/NRE-161325
  25. Lee DS, Lee KH, Kang TW, Cho ST. Effect of early robot-assisted training using virtual reality program in patient with stroke. The Journal of Korean Society of Physical Therapy. 2013;25(4):195-203.
  26. Kang SM, Yeun EJ. An effect of the secondary stroke prevention education program on self-care of acute ischemic stroke patients. Korean Society of Adult Nursing. 2005;17(4):646-655.