DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reliability and Validity of the Side-lying Instability and Prone Instability Tests in Patients with Lumbar Segmental Instability

  • Kim, Bo-Eon (Graduate School of Public Health & Welfare, Konyang University) ;
  • Lee, Kwan-Woo (Department of Physical Therapy, Ulsan College) ;
  • Park, Dae-Sung (Department of Physical Therapy, Konyang University)
  • Received : 2020.09.17
  • Accepted : 2020.11.23
  • Published : 2021.02.28

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to conduct inter-rater and intra-rater reliability tests in patients with low back pain (LBP) using the prone instability test (PIT) and side-lying instability test (SIT). We have analyzed the Korean version Oswestry disability index (K-ODI) correlations and radiograph finding (RF) for validity. METHODS: Individuals (n = 51) (mean age of 40.27 ± 13.28) with LBP for at least over a week were recruited, together with two participating physical therapist examiners. The measurement consisted of PIT, PST, K-ODI, and RF. Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value, negative predictive value, prevalence index, agreement %, Cohen's kappa, and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) were calculated. The PIT and SIT were compared with RF for validity analysis, while PIT, SIT, K-ODI, and RF were calculated for the correlation analysis. RESULTS: The intra-rater reliability test measured for the PIT (kappa = .79, PABAK = .88) and SIT (kappa = .73, PABAK = .84), and inter-rater reliability test measured for the SIT (kappa = .80, PABAK = .88) showed good agreements. The PIT (Sn = .65, Sp = .63) and SIT validities (Sn = .68, Sp = .70) were compared with RF, showing a significant correlation in PIT and RF (r = .69), SIT and RF (r = .73), and PIT and K-ODI (r = .53). CONCLUSION: The SIT is a more comfortable position test than the PIT in patients. Both PIT and SIT have acceptable reliability and validity.

Keywords

References

  1. Borkan JM, Koes B, Reis S, et al. A report from the Second International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain. Reexamining priorities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(18):1992-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199809150-00016
  2. Jang SY, Kong, MH, Hymanson HJ, Jin TK, et al. Radiographic Parameters of Segmental Instability in Lumbar Spine Using Kinetic MRI. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009;45(1):24-31. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2009.45.1.24
  3. O'Sullivan PB, Phyty GD, Twomey LT, et al. Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(24): 2959-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199712150-00020
  4. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2012;40(3): 377-96. https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2012.40.3.377
  5. Abbott JH, McCane B, Herbison P, et al. Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005; 6(56):1-10 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-6-1
  6. Behrsin JF, Andrews FJ. Lumbar segmental instability: Manual assessment findings supported by radiological measurement (A case study). Aust J Physiother. 1991; 37(3):171-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60539-0
  7. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Farfan HF. Instability of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;(165):110-23.
  8. Ravenna MM, Hoffman SL, Van Dillen LR. Low interrater reliability of examiners performing the prone instability test: a clinical test for lumbar shear instability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(6):913-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.042
  9. Ferrari S, Manni T, Bonetti F, et al. A literature review of clinical tests for lumbar instability in low back pain: validity and applicability in clinical practice. Chiropr Man Therap. 2015;23(14):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-014-0046-3
  10. Hicks GE, Fritz JM, Delitto A, et al. Interrater reliability of clinical examination measures for identification of lumbar segmental instability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(12):1858-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00365-4
  11. Tonosu J, Takeshita K, Hara N, et al. The normative score and the cut-off value of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Eur Spine J. 2012;21(8):1596-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2173-7
  12. Robinson M. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of a patient with low back pain using the patient response model: A case report. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016;32(4): 315-23. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2016.1138175
  13. Hasegawa K, Shimoda H, Kitahara K, et al. What are the reliable radiological indicators of lumbar segmental instability? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(5):650-7.
  14. Alyazedi FM, Lohman EB, Wesley Swen R, et al. The inter-rater reliability of clinical tests that best predict the subclassification of lumbar segmental instability: structural, functional and combined instability. J Man Manip Ther. 2015;23(4):197-204. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042618615Y.0000000002
  15. Jeon CH, Kim DJ, Kim SK, et al. Validation in the cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index. J Korean Med Sci. 2006;21(6):1092-7. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2006.21.6.1092
  16. Alqarni AM, Schneiders AG, Hendrik PA. Clinical Tests to Diagnose Lumbar Segmental Instability: A Systematic Review. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2011;41(3):130-40. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2011.3457
  17. Gopinath P. Lumbar segmental instability: Points to ponder. J Orthop. 2015;12(4):165-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2015.09.005
  18. Ylinen J, Nykanen M, Kautiainen H, Kautiainen H, et al. Evaluation of repeatability of pressure algometry on the neck muscles for clinical use. Man Ther. 2007;12(2):192-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2006.06.010
  19. Hoehler FK, Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(5):499-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00174-2
  20. Schneider M, Erhard R, Brach J, et al. Spinal palpation for lumbar segmental mobility and pain provocation: an interexaminer reliability study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(6):465-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.06.004