Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development of Curriculum Content Structure for Information Literacy Education

정보활용교육을 위한 교과 내용 체계 개발 연구

  • 박주현 (광주 수문초등학교) ;
  • 강봉숙 (청주대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이병기 (공주대학교 사범대학 문헌정보교육과)
  • Received : 2021.03.01
  • Accepted : 2021.03.11
  • Published : 2021.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to construct contents of elementary and secondary education which will be included in the information literacy education and to obtain basic information and implications necessary for developing new textbooks. For this study, three types of previously developed textbooks for information literacy education were analyzed, and curriculum content structure, and textbook structure of the draft version of the textbook 'Media and Information Life' developed in 2019-2020 were analyzed. The analysis results are as follows. the information literacy education textbook applied the information problem solving process model and contained the contents of print, and digital media and the media literacy necessary for democratic citizens, but it was necessary to add the types of libraries and media in sequence. Second, library, media, information, and reading literacy were major learning elements that made up the contents of the information literacy curriculum. Third, the "media and information life" textbook needed to present subject competencies, generalized knowledge, content system, and achievement standards in accordance with the system of the 2015 revised curriculum. In addition, social discussion was needed to derive the name of the information literacy curriculum.

본 연구의 목적은 초·중등 교육의 정보활용교육에 포함될 내용을 구성하고 교과서를 개발하는 데 필요한 기초정보와 시사점을 도출하는 데 있다. 본 연구를 위하여 기존에 개발된 정보활용교육 교과서 3종과 2019-2020년에 개발한 '미디어와 정보 생활' 교과서 초안의 내용 체계 및 교과서 체계를 분석하였다. 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 정보활용교육 교과서는 정보문제 해결과정 모형이 적용되었고 인쇄 및 디지털 미디어의 내용과 민주시민에게 필요한 미디어 리터러시의 내용을 담고 있었으나 도서관과 미디어의 종류를 계열성 있게 추가할 필요가 있었다. 둘째, 도서관·미디어·정보·독서 리터러시는 정보활용능력 교과 내용을 구성하는 주요한 학습 요소였다. 셋째, '미디어와 정보 생활' 교과서는 2015 개정 교육과정의 체계에 맞게 교과역량, 일반화된 지식, 내용 체계 및 성취 기준 등을 제시할 필요가 있었다. 또한 정보활용능력 교과의 명칭 도출을 위한 사회적 논의가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, Kyungjae & Park, Heejin (2013). A study on the current condition and the improvement of digital literacy education. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(2), 241-265. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.2.201306.241
  2. Choi, Jaehwang (2016). Considering core ideas of ACRL information literacy 'Framework (2015)'. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(3), 171-191. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.3.171
  3. General Framework of National Curriculum for Elementary and Secondary School, and a Curriculum Announcement. Ministry of Education Notice No. 2015-74.
  4. Jeong, Hyeon-Seon, Kim, Amie, Park, Yooshin, Jeon, Gyeongran, Lee, Jisun, & Noh, Jayeon (2016). Media literacy as 21st century key competence: systematizing media literacy teaching and learning contents. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(11), 211-238.
  5. Jung, Youngmi (2009). Information literacy education and the impact of self awareness on information literacy and libraries. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(4), 265-280. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.4.265
  6. Kang, Bong-Suk (2018a). A case study on school library educational services to reduce the information literacy gap due to the education gap. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(3), 307-329. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.49.3.201809.307
  7. Kang, Bong-Suk (2018b). A correlation between the education gap and information literacy. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(2), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.49.2.201806.179
  8. Kang, Jinsuk, Bae, Hyunsoon, Kim, Jiyeon, & Park, Yooshin (2019). A Study on the Improvement of Citizen Competencies through the Operation of Media Literacy Curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  9. Kim, Sung-Jun (2011). A study on the development of information literacy textbook, school library and information literacy. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(3), 271-292. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.3.201109.271
  10. Korean Library Association. School Library Curriculum Committee (2007). Standards for Library and Information Life Curriculum. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  11. Lee, Byeong-Ki (2007). Institutionalization of information literacy instruction and library assited instruction considering national level curriculum. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(1), 443-462. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.38.1.200703.443
  12. Lee, Byeong-Ki (2011). A study on the developmental tools of performance task for information literacy instruction. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(4), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.4.201112.31
  13. Lee, Byeong-Ki (2019). A study on the direction of 'Library and Information Life' curriculum revision based on '2015 Revised National Curriculum'. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 53(2), 49-68.
  14. Lee, Jungyeoun & Choi, Eunju (2006). An experimental study on the effectiveness of education for information literacy. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(1), 315-334.
  15. Lee, Kyeong-Hwa & Song, Gi-Ho (2016). A study on development of libraries' information literacy program based on integrated tasks to support the free semester system. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 27(4), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2016.27.4.085
  16. Lee, Rim (2018). A critical review on the current approved textbook system in terms of autonomy. Journal of Education & Culture, 24(6), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2018.24.6.45
  17. Ministry of Education (2019, December 30). The revision of the "Regulations on Textbooks" opens a way to develop and distribute learners-centered variety of textbooks. Available: https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/fileDown.do?m=020402&s=moe&fileSeq=ad3de06d1876fbc08308b8ff382dd086
  18. Park, Juhyeon (2020). An exploration for direction of the curriculum development through the analysis of media information literacy competencies and contents. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.2.119
  19. Park, Juhyeon & Kang, Bong-Suk (2020). A study on the development of media information literacy concept and educational contents. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(3), 223-250. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.51.3.202009.223
  20. Regulations on textbooks. Presidential Decree No. 30319.
  21. School Library Promotion Act. Act No.15368.
  22. Song, Gi-Ho (2011). Alternative measures for improvement of information literacy as cross curricula under the national curriculum in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(2), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.2.201106.29
  23. Song, Gi-Ho (2016). An analysis of elements for teacher librarians' educational information services embedded in inquiry tasks of elementary social studies textbooks: based on the 4th.5th.6th grade in the first term. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.201609.1
  24. ALA Presidential Committee on Information Literacy (1989). Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. Available: http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications /whitepapers/presidential
  25. American Association of School Librarians & Association for Educational Communications and Technology (1998). Information Power: Building Partnerships for Learning. Chicago and London: AASL.
  26. American Association of School Librarians (2007). Standards for the 21st Century Learner. Chicago: AASL.
  27. American Association of School Librarians (2018). National School Library Standards for Learners, School Librarians, and School Libraries. Chicago: AASL.
  28. Association of College & Research Libraries (2000). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago, IL: ACRL.
  29. Association of College & Research Libraries (2015). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Available: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
  30. Bundy, A. (2004). Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework-principles, Standards and Practice. Available: https://www.utas.edu.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0003/79068/anz-info-lit-policy.pdf
  31. Catts, R & Lau, J. (2008). Towards Information Literacy Indicators. Paris: UNESCO.
  32. Eisenberg, M. & Berkowitz, R. (1990). Information Problem Solving: The Big Six Skills Approach to Library & Information Skills Instruction. N.J.: Ablex.
  33. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (2015). IFLA School Library Guidelines. Hague, Netherlands: IFLA.
  34. Mittermeyer, D., Quirion, D., Archambault, C., Carrier, P., Grant, S., Guilmette, P., Healy, E., Hebert-Erban, M., Labelle, P., Nicholson, K., Proulx, M., Sauve, D., Sheeran, R., & Tardif, D. (2003). Information Literacy: Study of Incoming First-year Undergraduates in Quebec. Quebec: Bibliotheque Nationale de Quebec. Available: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.674.4389&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  35. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available: https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
  36. Society of College, National and University Libraries. Advisory Committee on Information Literacy (1999). Information Skills in Higher Education: a SCONUL Position Paper. Available: https://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Seven_pillars2.pdf
  37. Society of College, National and University Libraries. Working Group on Information Literacy (2011). The SCONUL Seven Pillars of Information Literacy: Core Model for Higher Education. Available: https://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf
  38. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2013). Global Media and Information Literacy Assessment Framework: Country Readiness And Competencies. Paris: UNESCO.
  39. U. S. Every Student Succeeds Act. Public Law 114-95.
  40. Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). The Information Service Environment: Relationships and Priorities. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. Related Pater No. 5. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED100391.pdf
  41. 日本 図書館振興財団 (2020). 調査する学習コンクール. Available: https://concours.toshokan.or.jp/
  42. 日本図書館協会図書館利用教育委員会 編 (2001). 図書館利用教育ガイドライン合冊版一 図書館における情報リテラシー支援サービスのために. 東京: 日本図書館協会.
  43. 日本 全国学校図書館協議会 (2019. 1. 1.). 情報資源を活用する学び方の指導体系表. Available: https://www.j-sla.or.jp/pdfs/20190101manabinosidoutaikeihyou.pdf
  44. 日本 全国学校図書館協議会 (2020. 10. 9.). Available: https://www.j-sla.or.jp/news/cn/post-204.html
  45. 日本 学校図書館司書教諭講習規程. 昭和二十九年文部省令第二十一号. Available: https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=329M50000080021