DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of the dimensions of the pterygoid hamulus for establishing age- and sex-specific reference standards using cone-beam computed tomography

  • Mehra, Archana (Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Nair Hospital Dental College) ;
  • Karjodkar, Freny R. (Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Nair Hospital Dental College) ;
  • Sansare, Kaustubh (Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Nair Hospital Dental College) ;
  • Kapoor, Ruchika (Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Nair Hospital Dental College) ;
  • Tambawala, Shahnaz (Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Nair Hospital Dental College) ;
  • Saxena, Vasu Siddhartha (Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Career PG Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital)
  • Received : 2020.07.09
  • Accepted : 2020.11.14
  • Published : 2021.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to establish age- and sex-specific reference standards for pterygoid hamulus(PH) dimensions using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: CBCT scans of 1,000 patients(493 males and 507 females) were retrospectively assessed in coronal sections for length and width measurements of the PH by 3 investigators. The study data were divided into 3 age groups(group 1: <20 years, group 2: 20-50 years, group 3: >50 years). Length and width were compared using one-way analysis of variance and the t-test for age and sex, respectively. Results: The length of the PH on the right side significantly increased from group 1 (6.11±1.47mm), through group 2 (6.65±1.67 mm) to group 3 (6.99±1.79 mm) and on the left side from group 2 (6.58±1.63) to group 3 (6.98±1.70). The width of the PH significantly decreased from group 1 (1.81±0.39 mm) to group 2 (1.61±0.39 mm) on the right side, and similarly from 1.87±0.36mm to 1.67±0.37mm on the left side. PH length (7.18±1.81mm on the right side and 7.10±1.72 mm on the left side) and width (1.68±0.38 mm on the right side and 1.74±0.36 mm on the left side) were significantly greater in males than in females. Conclusion: The length of the PH increased with age, whereas width first decreased and then increased. Length and width measurements were significantly higher in males than in females. These findings will aid in the diagnosis of untraceable pain in the oropharyngeal region related to altered PH morphology.

Keywords

References

  1. Putz R, Kroyer A. Functional morphology of the pterygoid hamulus. Ann Anat 1999; 181: 85-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0940-9602(99)80099-5
  2. Orhan K, Sakul BU, Oz U, Bilecenoglu B. Evaluation of the pterygoid hamulus morphology using cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112: e48-55.
  3. Krmpotic-Nemanic J, Vinter I, Marusic A. Relations of the pterygoid hamulus and hard palate in children and adults: anatomical implications for the function of the soft palate. Ann Anat 2006; 188: 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2005.05.005
  4. Oz U, Orhan K, Aksoy S, Ciftci F, Ozdoganoglu T, Rasmussen F. Association between pterygoid hamulus length and apnea hypopnea index in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a combined three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography and polysomnographic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 121: 330-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.10.032
  5. Dupont JS Jr, Brown CE. Comorbidity of pterygoid hamular area pain and TMD. Cranio 2007; 25: 172-6. https://doi.org/10.1179/crn.2007.027
  6. Komarnitki I, Mankowska-Pliszka H, Ungier E, Dziedzic D, Grzegorczyk M, Tomczyk A, et al. Functional morphometry of the pterygoid hamulus. A comparative study of modern and medieval populations. Anthropol Rev 2019; 82: 389-95. https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2019-0029
  7. Romoozi E, Razavi SH, Barouti P, Rahimi M. Investigating the morphologic indices of the hamulus pterygoid process using the CBCT technique. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2018; 6: 240-4.
  8. Nerkar A, Gadgil R, Bhoosreddy A, Shah K, Varma S. Conebeam computed tomography study of morphometric evaluation of pterygoid hamulus. Int J Recent Adv Multidiscip Res 2017; 4: 2678-82.
  9. Kronman JH, Padamsee M, Norris LH. Bursitis of the tensor veli palatini muscle with an osteophyte on the pterygoid hamulus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 71: 420-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(91)90420-H
  10. Sasaki T, Imai Y, Fujibayashi T. A case of elongated pterygoid hamulus syndrome. Oral Dis 2001; 7: 131-3. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-0825.2001.70212.x
  11. Sattur AP, Burde KN, Goyal M, Naikmasur VG. Unusual cause of palatal pain. Oral Radiol 2010; 27: 60-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-010-0056-3
  12. Komarnitki I, Skadorwa T, Chloupek A. Radiomorphometric assessment of the pterygoid hamulus as a factor promoting the pterygoid hamulus bursitis. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2020; 79: 134-40.