Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집)

Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

In-plane and Out-of-plane Seismic Performances of Masonry Walls Strengthened with Steel-Bar Truss Systems

강봉 트러스 시스템으로 보강된 조적벽체의 면내·외 내진 거동 평가

  • 황승현 (경기대학교 일반대학원 건축공학과) ;
  • 양근혁 (경기대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김상희 (경기대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2020.11.06
  • Accepted : 2021.01.21
  • Published : 2021.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This experimental study was conducted to evaluate the in-plane and out-of-plane seismic performances of an unreinforced masonry walls (URMs) strengthened with prestressed steel-bar truss systems developed in the present investigation. The truss systems were installed on both faces of the walls. All the wall specimens were subjected to lateral in-plane or out-of-plane cyclic loads at the fixed gravity stress of 0.25 MPa. The seismic performance of the strengthened specimens was compared to that measured in the counterpart URM. When compared with the lateral load-displacement curve of the URM, the strengthened walls exhibited the following improvements: 190% for initial stiffness, 180% for peak strength, 610% for accumulated energy dissipation capacity, and 510% for equivalent damping ratio under the in-plane state; the corresponding improvements under the out-of-plane state were 230% for initial stiffness, 190% for peak strength, 240% for accumulated energy dissipation capacity, and 120% for equivalent damping ratio, respectively. These results indicate that the developed technique is very promising in enhancing the overall seismic performance of URM.

이 연구에서는 강봉 트러스 시스템으로 보강된 조적벽체의 면내·외 거동에 대한 내진성능을 평가하였다. 강봉 트러스 시스템 보강은 무보강 조적벽체 1면에 2개의 강봉 트러스 시스템 유닛을 배치하였다. 면내 거동에 대한 실험결과는 무보강 조적벽체 및 벽체 1면에 1개의 강봉 트러스 시스템 보강된 조적벽체와 비교하였으며, 면외 거동에 대한 실험결과는 무보강 조적벽체와 비교하였다. 실험 결과, 강봉 트러스 시스템으로 보강된 조적벽체의 면내·외 초기 강성은 무보강 조적벽체에 비해 각각 1.9배 및 2.3배 높았으며, 면내·외 최대 내력은 각각 1.8배 및 1.9배 높았다. 특히 강봉 트러스 시스템으로 보강된 조적벽체의 면내·외 에너지 소산능력은 무보강 조적벽체에 비해 각각 6.1배 및 2.4배 높았으며, 등가 감쇠비는 각각 5.1배 및 1.2배 높았다. 즉, 강봉 트러스 시스템은 무보강 조적벽체의 면내 방향으로의 내진성능 향상뿐만 아니라 면외 방향으로의 내진성능 향상에도 유리할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. AIK (2018), Site Inspection and Damage Investigation of Buildings by Earthquakes in Gyeongju and Pohang, Architectural Institute of Korea, Seoul, Korea. (In Korean)
  2. ASTM C 1314 (2007), Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms, ASTM International, Philadelphia, USA.
  3. ASTM E 519 (2003), Standard Test Method for Diagonal Tension(Shear) in Masonry Assemblages, ASTM International, Philadelphia, USA.
  4. Bhattacharya, S., Nayak S., and Dutta, S. C. (2014), A critical review of retrofitting methods for unreinforced masonry structures, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 7, 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.004
  5. Capozucca, R. (2011), Experimental analysis of historic masonry walls reinforced by CFRP under in-plane cyclic loading, Composite Structures, 94(1), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.06.007
  6. Chang, K. K., and Seo, D. W.(2011), Present State and Necessity of Seismic Design for Low-rise Masonry Buildings in Korea, Special Issue, Review of Architecture and Building Science, 55(5), 45-50.
  7. Darbhanzi, A., Marefat, M. S., and Khanmohammadi, M. (2014), Investigation of in-plane seismic retrofit of unreinforced masonry walls by means of vertical steel ties, Construction and Building Materials, 52, 122-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.020
  8. FEMA 356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. FEMA, Washington.
  9. Hwang, S. H., Yang, K. H., and Kim, S. H.(2020), Evaluation on Seismic Performance of Masonry Walls Strengthened with Unbonded Steel-Bar Truss Systems, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, Accepted. (In Korean)
  10. Ismail N and Ingham JM (2012), Cyclic out-of-plane behavior of slender clay brick masonry walls seismically strengthened using posttensioning. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138(10), 1255-1266. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000565
  11. KCS 41 34 02 (2018), Brick Construction. Korea Construction Standard Center. (In Korean)
  12. KCS 41 46 02 (2018), Cement Mortar Coat. Korea Construction Standard Center. (In Korean)
  13. KS B 0802 (2018), Method of Tensile Test for Metallic Materials, KSA, Seoul, Korea. (In Korean)
  14. KS F 4004 (2013), Concrete Bricks, KSA, Seoul, Korea. (In Korean)
  15. Lee, J. H. (2005), Seismic Capacity and Seismic Retrofitting of Low Rise Buildings Unreinforced Masonry, Brick-infilled RC Frame and Steel Slit Damper Retrofitted RC Frame. Ph.D. Thesis. Kwangwoon University. (in Korean)
  16. NIDP (2009), Study on Seismic Retrofitting Techniques for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings, National Emergency Management Agency, Seoul, Korea. (In Korean)
  17. Popa, V., Pascu, R., Papurcu, A., and Albota, E. (2016) Retrofitting of squat masonry walls by FRP grids bonded by cement-based mortar, Earthquakes and Structures, 10(1), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.1.125
  18. Rinaldin, G., Amadio, C., and Gattesco N. (2017), Review of experimental cyclic tests on unreinforced and strengthened masonry spandrels and numerical modelling of their cyclic behavio", Engineering and Structures, 132, 609-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.063
  19. Yang, K. H., Joo, D. B., Sim, J. I., and Kang, J. H. (2012), In-plane seismic performance of unreinforced masonry walls strengthened with unbonded prestressed wire rope units, Engineering and Structures, 45, 449-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.017
  20. Yang, K. H., Mun, J. H., and Hwang, S. H. (2020), Cyclic Shear Behavior of Masonry Walls Strengthened with Prestressed Steel Bars and Glass Fiber Grids, Composite Structures, 238, 1-12.