DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Mobile Phone Text Messaging on Collision Avoidance Strategy with Approaching and Stationary Pedestrian

모바일폰 문자 메시지가 동적·정적 보행자 충돌회피전략에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Yeon-Jong (Department of Sport and Leisure, Semyung University) ;
  • Kim, Joo-Nyeon (Department of Sport Science, Korea Institute of Sport Science)
  • Received : 2021.02.08
  • Accepted : 2021.03.16
  • Published : 2021.03.31

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of mobile phone text messaging on the collision avoidance strategy for an approaching and stationary pedestrian. Method: Eighteen healthy young adults participated in this study. Each participant was asked to perform a task to walking with/without mobile phone text messaging and a task to avoid collisions with another pedestrian who was approaching or stationary during walking. Results: When text messaging with avoidance collision, it showed an early onset time, a larger mediolateral COM trajectory, trunk rotation angle and trunk rotation velocity (p<.05). Also, compared to an approaching pedestrian, when avoiding collision with a stationary pedestrian, it showed a later onset time, a lager avoidance displacement, mediolateral COM trajectory, trunk rotation angle (p<.05). Conclusion: Results suggest that mobile phone text messaging while collision avoidance leads to delay the perception stage and alters the adaptation stage. Consequently, pedestrian executed in an exaggerated avoidance action to create a greater safety margin when attending to mobile phone test messages while avoiding another pedestrian.

Keywords

References

  1. Alcock, L., Galna, B., Hausdorff, J. M., Lord, S. & Rochester, L. (2018). Gait & Posture Special Issue: Gait adaptations in response to obstacle type in fallers with Parkinson's disease. Gait & Posture, 61, 368-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.01.030
  2. Alsaleh, R., Sayed, T. & Zaki, M. H. (2018). Assessing the effect of pedestrians' use of cell phones on their walking behavior: a study based on automated video analysis. Transportation Research Record, 2672(35), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118780708
  3. Aravind, G. & Lamontagne, A. (2014). Perceptual and locomotor factors affect obstacle avoidance in persons with visuospatial neglect. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 11(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-1
  4. Basili, P., Saglam, M., Kruse, T., Huber, M., Kirsch, A. & Glasauer, S. (2013). Strategies of locomotor collision avoidance. Gait & Posture, 37(3), 385-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.08.003
  5. Cutting, J. E., Vishton, P. M. & Braren, P. A. (1995). How we avoid collisions with stationary and moving objects. Psychological Review, 102(4), 627. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.102.4.627
  6. Fajen, B. & Warren, W. (2003). Behavioral dynamics of steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(2), 343-362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.343
  7. Galna, B., Peters, A., Murphy, A. T. & Morris, M. E. (2009). Obstacle crossing deficits in order adults: a systematic review. Gait & Posture, 30(3), 270-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.022
  8. Gerin-Lajoie, M., Richards, C. L., Fung, J. & McFadyen, B. J. (2008). Characteristics of personal space during obstacle circumvention in physical and virtual environments. Gait & Posture, 27(2), 239-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.03.015
  9. Gerin-Lajoie, M., Richards, C. L. & McFadyen, B. J. (2005). The negotiation of stationary and moving obstructions during walking: anticipatory locomotor adaptations and preservation of personal space. Motor Control, 9(3), 242-269. https://doi.org/10.1123/mcj.9.3.242
  10. Gerin-Lajoie, M., Richards, C. L. & McFadyen, B. J. (2006). The circumvention of obstacles during walking in different environmental contexts: a comparison between older and younger adults. Gait & Posture, 24(3), 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.11.001
  11. Hackney, A. L. & Cinelli, M. E. (2011). Action strategies of older adults walking through apertures. Gait & Posture, 33(4), 733-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.019
  12. Hackney, A. L. & Cinelli, M. E. (2013). Older adults are guided by their dynamic perceptions during aperture crossing. Gait & Posture, 37(1), 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.06.020
  13. Hackney, A. L., Cinelli, M. E. & Frank, J. S. (2015). Does the passability of apertures change when walking through human versus pole obstacles?. Acta Psychologica, 162, 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.10.007
  14. Hackney, A. L., Van Ruymbeke, N., Bryden, P. J. & Cinelli, M. E. (2014). Direction of single obstacle circumvention in middle-aged children. Gait & Posture, 40(1), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.005
  15. Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F. & Ruggiero, G. (2014). Body space in social interactions: a comparison of reaching and comfort distance in immersive virtual reality. PloS One, 9(11), e111511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111511
  16. Kondo, Y., Fukuhara, K., Suda, Y. & Higuchi, T. (2020). Training older adults with virtual reality use to improve collision-avoidance behavior when walking through an aperture. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 92, 104265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104265
  17. Lamberg, E. M. & Muratori, L. M. (2012). Cell phones change the way we walk. Gait & Posture, 35(4), 688-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.005
  18. Lee, Y. J. & Kim, J. N. (2019). Strategies of collision avoidance with moving and stationary human obstacles during walking. Korean Journal of Sports Biomechanics, 29(2), 97-104.
  19. Li, K. Z. & Lindenberger, U. (2002). Relations between aging sensory/sensorimotor and cognitive functions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(7), 777-783. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00073-8
  20. Licence, S., Smith, R., McGuigan, M. P. & Earnest, C. P. (2015). Gait pattern alterations during walking, texting and walking and texting during cognitively distractive tasks while negotiating common pedestrian obstacles. PLoS One, 10(7), e0133281. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133281
  21. Lim, J., Amado, A., Sheehan, L. & Van Emmerik, R. E. (2015). Dual task interference during walking: The effects of texting on situational awareness and gait stability. Gait & Posture, 42(4), 466-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.07.060
  22. Lu, T. W., Chen, H. L. & Chen, S. C. (2006). Comparisons of the lower limb kinematics between young and older adults when crossing obstacles of different heights. Gait & Posture, 23(4), 471-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.06.005
  23. Meerhoff, L. A., Pettre, J., Lynch, S. D., Cretual, A. & Olivier, A. H. (2018). Collision avoidance with multiple walkers: Sequential or simultaneous interactions?. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02354
  24. Menant, J. C., St George, R. J., Fitzpatrick, R. C. & Lord, S. R. (2010). Impaired depth perception and restricted pitch head movement increase obstacle contacts when dual-tasking in older people. The Journals of Gerontology Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 65(7), 751-757.
  25. Muir, B. C., Haddad, J. M., Heijnen, M. J. & Rietdyk, S. (2015). Proactive gait strategies to mitigate risk of obstacle contact are more prevalent with advancing age. Gait & Posture, 41(1), 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.10.005
  26. Nasar, J. L. & Troyer, D. (2013). Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 57, 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.03.021
  27. Olivier, A. H., Marin, A., Cretual, A., Berthoz, A. & Pettre, J. (2013). Collision avoidance between two walkers: Role-dependent strategies. Gait & Posture, 38(4), 751-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.017
  28. Persad, C. C., Giordani, B., Chen, H. C., Ashton-Miller, J. A., Alexander, N. B., Wilson, C. S. & Schultz, A. B. (1995). Neuropsychological predictors of complex obstacle avoidance in healthy older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 50(5), P272-277.
  29. Pham, Q. C. & Hicheur, H. (2009). On the open-loop and feedback processes that underlie the formation of trajectories during visual and nonvisual locomotion in humans. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102(5), 2800-2815. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00284.2009
  30. Pham, Q. C., Hicheur, H., Arechavaleta, G., Laumond, J. P. & Berthoz, A. (2007). The formation of trajectories during goal-oriented locomotion in humans. II. A maximum smoothness model. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26(8), 2391-2403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05835.x
  31. Plummer, P., Apple, S., Dowd, C. & Keith, E. (2015). Texting and walking: Effect of environmental setting and task prioritization on dual-task interference in healthy young adults. Gait & Posture, 41(1), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.08.007
  32. Schabrun, S. M., van den Hoorn, W., Moorcroft, A., Greenland, C. & Hodges, P. W. (2014). Texting and walking: strategies for postural control and implications for safety. PloS One, 9(1), e84312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084312
  33. Shimizu, K., Kihara, Y., Itou, K., Tai, K. & Furuna, T. (2020). How perception of personal space influence obstacle avoidance during walking: differences between young and older adults. Physical Therapy Research, 23(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E9988
  34. Silva, W. S., Aravind, G., Sangani, S. & Lamontagne, A. (2018). Healthy young adults implement distinctive avoidance strategies while walking and circumventing virtual human vs. non-human obstacles in a virtual environment. Gait & Posture, 61, 294-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.01.028
  35. Silva, W. S., McFadyen, B., Fung, J. & Lamontagne, A. (2019). Effects of age on obstacle avoidance while walking and deciphering text versus audio phone messages. Gerontology, 65(5), 524-536. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499067
  36. Silva, W. S., McFadyen, B. J., Fung, J. & Lamontagne, A. (2020). Reading text messages at different stages of pedestrian circumvention affects strategies for collision avoidance in young and older adults. Gait & Posture, 76, 290-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.11.017
  37. Vallis, L. A. & McFadyen, B. J. (2003). Locomotor adjustments for circumvention of an obstacle in the travel path. Experimental Brain Research, 152(3), 409-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1558-6
  38. Wells, H. L., McClure, L. A., Porter, B. E. & Schwebel, D. C. (2018). Distracted pedestrian behavior on two urban college campuses. Journal of Community Health, 43(1), 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-017-0392-x
  39. Yoon, S., Chang, J. K. & Kim, J. (2014). Effects of a water exercise on the lower extremities coordination during obstacle gait in the female elderly-focusing on training and detraining effects. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 24(2), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2014.24.2.95