DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Servicism Model of the New Society and Education System

서비스주의 사회교육시스템의 구조와 운용 연구

  • Hyunsoo Kim (School of Business Administration, Kookmin University)
  • 김현수 (국민대 경영대학 경영학부)
  • Received : 2021.06.24
  • Accepted : 2021.09.06
  • Published : 2021.09.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to derive a society and education system model that will improve the happiness and sustainability of human society. An ideological model for making human society a happy society was derived, and a society and education system structure and operation model based on this was presented. A fair society, a justice society, a mutually considerate society, and a society where individuals are happy are the conditions for a sustainable society. After analyzing the current situation of freedom and equality pursued by capitalism and democracy, which are currently adopted by most societies, an improvement model was derived from the perspective of a sustainable society. The cost of freedom and equality were analyzed and a new alternative system was discussed. The social solidarity and class mobility issues were discussed together and servicism was derived as an alternative solution. It is a system in which two opposing opponents of individual freedom and social norms form a symmetrical balance, and material and spiritual values are balanced. Servicism is a dynamic balance model. That is, the dimensions of time and space are involved. It is a model that maintains a thorough balance through a dialectical process as time and space change, and one value can dominate the other at a specific time or space. The service-oriented society and education system is a system that simultaneously pursues the goals of individual happiness and sustainable development of the social community.

본 연구는 인류사회의 행복도와 지속가능성을 증진시킬 사회교육시스템 개선모델 도출을 위해 수행되었다. 인류사회를 행복한 사회로 만들기 위한 사상적 모델을 도출하고, 이에 기반한 사회교육시스템 구조와 운용모델을 제시하였다. 공정한 사회, 정의로운 사회, 상호 배려하는 사회, 개인이 행복한 사회 등이 지속가능한 사회의 조건일 것이다. 또한 계층이동성이 높으며 자유와 평등이 동시에 적정한 수준으로 보장되는 사회가 지속가능한 사회일 것이다. 현재 대다수 사회에서 채택하고 있는 자본주의와 민주주의가 추구하는 자유와 평등의 현재 상황을 분석한 후, 지속가능사회 관점에서 개선 모델을 도출하였다. 자유의 대가와 평등의 대가를 분석하고 새로운 대안시스템을 논의하였다. 자본주의와 민주주의가 결합된 과도한 경쟁시스템의 문제와, 이에 수반되는 수직적 사회구조화 촉진 문제를 논의하였다. 사회적연대와 계층이동성 문제를 함께 논의하며 해결 대안으로 서비스주의를 도출하였다. 서비스주의는 서비스철학에 기반한 사회관, 역사관, 인간관을 토대로 한다. 개인의 자유와 사회규범이라는 두 대립자가 대칭균형을 이루는 시스템, 상승경쟁과 사회적연대가 대칭을 이루고, 물질적 가치와 정신적 가치가 균형을 이루는 시스템이다. 서비스주의는 동태적 균형모델이다. 즉 시간과 공간 차원이 개입된다. 특정 시기 또는 특정 공간에서 하나의 가치가 다른 가치보다 우세할 수 있으며, 시간과 공간이 변해감에 따라 변증법적 과정을 통해 철저한 균형을 유지해가는 모델이다. 개인의 행복과 사회공동체의 지속가능발전 목표를 동시에 추구하는 시스템이 서비스주의 사회교육시스템이다. 중도와 절제의 가치를 존중하는 교육혁신이 필요하며, 사회의 발전과 개인의 행복에 대한 새로운 관점이 필요하다. 향후 본 모델을 실용화하는 연구가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, Hyunsoo (2021a), A Servicism Model of the New Politics and Administration System, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.11, No.2, Jun. 2021, pp.1-19 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2021.11.2.001
  2. Kim, Hyunsoo (2021b), A Servicism Model of the New Economy System, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.11, No.1, Mar. 2021, pp.1-20 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2021.11.1.001
  3. Kim, Hyunsoo (2020a), A Study on the New Management Technology Model in Service Economy Era, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.10, No.4, Dec. 2020, pp.101-125 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2020.10.4.101
  4. Kim, Hyunsoo (2020b), A Study on the New Manager Model in Service Economy Era, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.10, No.3, Sept. 2020, pp.1-22 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2020.10.3.01
  5. Kim, Hyunsoo (2020c), A Study on the Service Management Model as the New Management, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.10, No.2, June 2020, pp.91-108 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2020.10.2.091
  6. Kim, Hyunsoo (2020d), A Study on the Framework of New Management, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.10, No.1, Mar. 2020, pp.1-15 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2020.10.1.001
  7. Kim, Hyunsoo (2019a), A Study on Service Philosophy for New Economy and Society, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.9, No.4, Dec. 2019, pp.1-17 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2019.9.4.001
  8. Kim, Hyunsoo (2019b), A Study on the Service Philosophy of Major Western Ideology, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.9, No.3, Sept. 2019, pp.1-16 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2019.9.3.001
  9. Kim, Hyunsoo (2019c), A Study on the Service Philosophy of Mainstream Oriental Ideology, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.9, No.2, June 2019, pp.1-15 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2019.9.2.001
  10. Kim, Hyunsoo (2019d), A Study on the Service Philosophy of Major Korean Ideology, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.9, No.1, March 2019, pp.1-16 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2019.9.1.001
  11. Kim, Hyunsoo (2018) New Management of Management, Kookmin University Press
  12. Kim, Hyunsoo (2017), A Study on Korean Traditional Philosophy as the Service Economy Philosophy, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.7, No.3, Sept. 2017, pp.105-118 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2017.7.3.105
  13. Kim, Hyunsoo(2016), A Study on Accelerating Service Economy by the 4th Industrial Revolution, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.6, No.3, Sept. 2016, pp.15-28 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2016.6.3.015
  14. Lamprecht, S.P.(1992), Our Philosophical Traditions, Kim Taegil, etc. Tr., Eulyou Cultureg Co.
  15. Lao-Tzu(1982), Tao Te Ching, Ki Keun Chang Tr., Samsung Publishing Co.
  16. NAVER Knowledge Encyclopedia(2020), The Second Law of Thermodynamics, Physics Stroll, Jongpil Lee.
  17. Skirbekk, G. and N. Gilje(2016), A History of Western Thought, Yoon, Hyungsik Tr., Ihaksa
  18. The School of Life(2016), Kim & Oh Tr., Great Thinkers, Wiseberry
  19. Yang, Haerim(2012), A History of Western Philosophy, Jipmundang