DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reconstruction of a pathologic fracture following osteomyelitis of the mandible using a fibula osteocutaneous flap

  • Kim, Taeki (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Junhyung (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Jaehoon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jo, Taehee (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Hyeong Chan (Department of Pathology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jeong, Woonhyeok (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2020.12.22
  • Accepted : 2021.04.19
  • Published : 2021.04.20

Abstract

The use of a fibula osteocutaneous flap is currently the mainstay of segmental mandibular reconstruction. This type of flap is used to treat tumors, trauma, or osteoradionecrosis of the mandible. However, a fibula osteocutaneous flap may also be a good option for reconstructing the mandible to preserve oropharyngeal function and facial appearance in cases of pathological fracture requiring extensive segmental bone resection. Chronic osteomyelitis is one of the various causes of subsequent pathologic mandibular fractures; however, it is rare, and there have been few reports using free flaps in osteomyelitis of the mandible. We share our experience with a 76-year-old patient who presented with a pathologic fracture following osteomyelitis of the mandible that was reconstructed using a fibula osteocutaneous flap after wide segmental resection.

Keywords

References

  1. Pell GJ, Shafer WG, Gregory GT, Ping RS, Spear LB. Garre's osteomyelitis of the mandible; report of case. J Oral Surg (Chic) 1955;13:248-52.
  2. Schuknecht B, Valavanis A. Osteomyelitis of the mandible. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2003;13:605-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1052-5149(03)00044-3
  3. Coletti D, Ord RA. Treatment rationale for pathological fractures of the mandible: a series of 44 fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:215-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.09.176
  4. Choi BJ, Choi SC, Kwon YD, Drew SJ. Aneurysmal bone cyst causing a pathologic fracture of the mandibular condyle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:2995-3000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.058
  5. Boffano P, Roccia F, Gallesio C, Berrone S. Pathological mandibular fractures: a review of the literature of the last two decades. Dent Traumatol 2013;29:185-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12028
  6. Marx RE. Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascular necrosis of the jaws: a growing epidemic. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1115-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(03)00720-1
  7. Wellington K, Goa KL. Zoledronic acid: a review of its use in the management of bone metastases and hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Drugs 2003;63:417-37. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200363040-00009
  8. Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J, Goodday R, Aghaloo T, Mehrotra B, et al. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: 2014 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72:1938-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.031
  9. Shibahara T. Antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ): a twist of fate in the bone. Tohoku J Exp Med 2019;247:75-86. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.247.75
  10. Slough CM, Woo BM, Ueeck BA, Wax MK. Fibular free flaps in the management of osteomyelitis of the mandible. Head Neck 2008;30:1531-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20801
  11. Pincus DJ, Armstrong MB, Thaller SR. Osteomyelitis of the craniofacial skeleton. Semin Plast Surg 2009;23:73-9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1214159
  12. Shin J, Park SI, Cho JT, Jung SN, Byeon J, Seo BF. Necrotizing fasciitis of the masticator space with osteomyelitis of the mandible in an edentulous patient. Arch Craniofac Surg 2019;20:270-3. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2019.00311
  13. Hundepool AC, Dumans AG, Hofer SO, Fokkens NJ, Rayat SS, van der Meij EH, et al. Rehabilitation after mandibular reconstruction with fibula free-flap: clinical outcome and quality of life assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:1009-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.05.021
  14. Hidalgo DA. Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;84:71-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198907000-00014
  15. Lee YW, You HJ, Jung JA, Kim DW. Mandibular reconstruction using customized three-dimensional titanium implant. Arch Craniofac Surg 2018;19:152-6. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2018.19.2.152
  16. Suh JM, Chung CH, Chang YJ. Head and neck reconstruction using free flaps: a 30-year medical record review. Arch Craniofac Surg 2021;22:38-44. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00745
  17. Chung JH, Kim KJ, Jung KY, Baek SK, Park SH, Yoon ES. Recipient vessel selection for head and neck reconstruction: a 30-year experience in a single institution. Arch Craniofac Surg 2020;21:269-75. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00339
  18. Ren W, Gao L, Li S, Chen C, Li F, Wang Q, et al. Virtual planning and 3D printing modeling for mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2018;23:e359-66.