DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Health Risk Assessment for Residents after Exposure to Chemical Accidents: Formaldehyde

화학사고물질 노출에 따른 피해지역 주민 건강위해성평가: 폼알데하이드 사례를 중심으로

  • Park, Sihyun (Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seokyeong University) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Sung (Accident Prevention and Assessment Division 2, National Institute of Chemical Safety, Ministry of Environment) ;
  • Lim, Huibeen (Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seokyeong University) ;
  • Park, Jihoon (Accident Response Coordination Division, National Institute of Chemical Safety, Ministry of Environment) ;
  • Lee, Cheolmin (Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seokyeong University) ;
  • Hwang, Seung-Ryul (Accident Response Coordination Division, National Institute of Chemical Safety, Ministry of Environment) ;
  • Lee, Chungsoo (Accident Response Coordination Division, National Institute of Chemical Safety, Ministry of Environment)
  • 박시현 (서경대학교 화학생명공학과) ;
  • 조용성 (환경부 화학물질안전원 사고예방심사2과) ;
  • 임희빈 (서경대학교 화학생명공학과) ;
  • 박지훈 (환경부 화학물질안전원 사고대응총괄과) ;
  • 이철민 (서경대학교 화학생명공학과) ;
  • 황승율 (환경부 화학물질안전원 사고대응총괄과) ;
  • 이청수 (환경부 화학물질안전원 사고대응총괄과)
  • Received : 2021.02.19
  • Accepted : 2021.03.08
  • Published : 2021.04.30

Abstract

Objectives: Acute exposure to high concentrations of chemicals can occur when a chemical accident takes place. As such exposure can cause ongoing environmental pollution, such as in the soil and groundwater, there is a need for a tool that can assess health effects in the long term. The purpose of this study was assessing the health risks of residents living near a chemical accident site due to long-term exposure while considering the temporal concentration changes of the toxic chemicals leaked during the accident until their extinction in the environment using a multimedia environmental dynamics model. Methods: A health risk assessment was conducted on three cases of formaldehyde chemical accidents. In this study, health risk assessment was performed using a multimedia environmental dynamics model that considers the behavior of the atmosphere, soil, and water. In addition, the extinction period of formaldehyde in the environment was regarded as extinction in the environment when the concentration in the air and soil fell below the background concentration prior to the accident. The subjects of health risk assessment were classified into four groups according to age: 0-9 years old, 10-18 years old, 19-64 years old, and over 65 years old. Carcinogenic risk assessment by respiratory exposure and non-carcinogenic risk assessment by soil intake were conducted as well. Results: In the assessment of carcinogenic risk due to respiratory exposure, the excess carcinogenic risk did not exceed 1.0×10-6 in all three chemical accidents, so there was no health effect due to the formaldehyde chemical accident. As a result of the evaluation of non-carcinogenic risk due to soil intake, none of the three chemical accidents had a risk index of 1, so there was no health effect. For all three chemical accidents, the excess cancer risk and hazard index were the highest in the age group 0-9. Next, 10-18 years old, 65 years old or older, and 19-64 years old showed the highest risk. Conclusion: This study considers environmental changes after a chemical accident occurs and until the substance disappears from the environment. It also conducts a health risk assessment by reflecting the characteristics of the long-term persistence and concentration change over time. It is thought that it is of significance as a health risk assessment study reflecting the exposure characteristics of the accident substance for an actual chemical accident.

Keywords

References

  1. Jeon JM, Kang BW, Lee HS, Lee CM. Health Risk assessment of heavy metals in PM2.5 in industrial areas. J Environ Health Sci. 2010; 36(4): 294-305. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2010.36.4.294
  2. Im JY, Kim HJ, Kim MS, Lee JH, Lee SM, Lee CS. A study on the variation of hazardous pollutant emissions in Korea from 2006 to 2015. J Environ Health Sci. 2018; 44(1): 15-23.
  3. Kim OK, Song YH, Lee JH. The Estimation of Benzo(a)pyrene Emission from Fuel Combustion in the Seosan Area. J Environ Health Sci. 2017; 43(1): 55-63. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2017.43.1.55
  4. Kim HJ, Im JY, Yun JH, Lee JH, Jeon JH, Lee CS. A study on the characteristics of chemicals in major industrial complexes. J Environ Health Sci. 2018; 44(6): 515-523.
  5. Im JY, Jeon DY, Kim BK, Ryu JS, Yoon DS, Lee CS. A study on the emission characteristics of odorous substances in Korea. J Environ Health Sci. 2019; 45(5): 465-473.
  6. Im JY, Kim BK, Kim HJ, Lee MJ, Jeon DY, Ryu JS, Yun DS, Jang YC, Lee CS. A study on the characteristics of hazardous pollutant emissions in Korea from 2007 to 2016. Int J Environ Res. 2020; 14: 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-020-00264-3
  7. Chemical Information System. Available: https://icis.me.go.kr [accessed 15 February 2021].
  8. United State Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. Federal Register. 1986: 51(185): 33992-34003.
  9. United State Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Risk assessment guidance for superfund: volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual, EPA/540/1-89/00.2. 1989.
  10. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Human risk assessment of single exposure in chemical incidents: present situation and emerging chemical incident scenarios. RIVM. 2013.
  11. Lim YW, Kim HH, Lee CS, Shin DC, Chang YS, Yang JY. Exposure assessment and health risk of poly-brominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) flame retardants in the indoor environment of elementary school students in Korea. Science of the Total Environment. 2014; 470-471: 1376-1389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.013
  12. Park SH, Lim HB, Hong HJ, Kim HS, Yoon DK, Lee HW, Kong HK, Jeon JI, Choi JW, Chol EM, Cho YS, Lee CM. Health risk assessment for multimedia exposure of formaldehyde emitted by chemical accident. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020. Online first.
  13. Yoon DK, Namgoung SJ, Kong HK, Hong HJ, Lim HB, Park SH, Lee HW, Lee JS, Lee CM. Assessment of exposure to and risk of formaldehyde and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) by time activity applying real-time indoor and outdoor monitoring. J Environ Health Sci. 2019; 45(6): 646-657. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2019.45.6.646
  14. Quantum Geographic Information System (QGIS). Available: https://www.qgis.org/en/site [accessed 1 February 2021].
  15. United State Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Interim Acute Exposure Guideline Level (AEGLs) for Formaldehyde. 2008.
  16. Hearn JD, Weber R, Nichols R, Henley MV, Foz S. Deposition of Cl2 on soils during outdoor releases. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2013; 252: 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.02.038
  17. Ministry of Environment (MoE). Multi-Media and Multi-Pathway Aggregate Risk Assessment (II) -Formaldehyde-. 2012.
  18. Ministry of Environment (MoE). Korean exposure factors handbook for children. 2016.
  19. Ministry of Environment (MoE). Korean exposure factors handbook. 2007.
  20. United State Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Exposure Factors Handbook Chapter 5 (Update): Soil and Dust Ingestion, EPA/600/R-17/384F. 2017.
  21. Statistics Korea (KOSTAT). 2017 Life Time Table. 2018.