한국조경학회지 (Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)

  • 제49권2호
  • /
  • Pages.41-50
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-1755(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9566(eISSN)
한국조경학회 (The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

2014년과 2020년 양주시 도시공원 이용빈도별 집단 간 이용행태 및 인식차이 연구

Differences in Park Use Behavior and Perception between Groups by Frequency of Visit through Comparison of Yangju Urban Parks in 2014 and 2020

  • 이재호 (서울시립대학교 조경학과)
  • Lee, Jae Ho (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, College of Urban Science, The University of Seoul)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.12
  • 심사 : 2021.03.15
  • 발행 : 2021.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 도시공원을 이용하는 시민을 대상으로 이용빈도에 따라 이용자를 분류하여 도시공원 이용 시 이용행태, 관리방안 및 인식 차이를 보고자 하였으며, 동일한 설문지를 사용한 2014년도와 2020년도 설문조사 결과를 이용하여 도시공원 운영 및 관리에 대한 시사점을 제시하고자 하였다. 경기도 양주시의 도시공원을 대상으로 연구를 진행하였으며, 양주시에 거주하는 시민을 대상으로 2014년에는 740부, 2020년에는 431부의 설문지 결과를 이용하였다. 공원 이용빈도에 따라 고이용, 저이용 집단으로 분류하고, 집단에 따른 인구사회학적 차이 및 공원이용방식 차이를 비교한 후, 두 집단 간에 향후 공원 관리방향에 대한 인식 차이를 해당 연도에 따라 통계적 분석기법을 활용하여 분석 및 비교하였다. 분석결과, 2014년도에는 공원의 양적 확충 및 접근성 개선이 가장 주요한 문제로 두드러졌지만, 2020년에는 양적 확대보다는 노후 시설 점검 및 개선, 다양한 프로그램 제공, 지역의 정체성을 드러낼 수 있는 테마형 근린공원 조성 등 공원운영 관리방안에 대한 관심이 높아졌음을 확인할 수 있었다. 공원관리 방향의 차이에 있어서는 고이용 집단에서 지속적 관리가 중요하다고 인식하고 있음에도 불구하고, 덜 이용하는 집단에 비해서 상대적으로 소극적으로 공원개선 활동에 참가하겠다고 응답하였으며, 이는 장기적으로 공원을 더 많이 이용하는 사람들을 어떠한 방식으로 공원관리에 참여시킬 수 있는지에 대한 논의가 필요함을 보여주었다. 본 연구는 이용빈도에 따라 이용집단을 나눠서 다른 행태 및 인식 차이를 보고자 했다는 점에서 의의가 있지만, 향후 연구에서는 다양한 변수의 조합을 통해 보다 세밀한 이용집단의 차이를 분석할 필요가 있다.

This study was conducted to see the differences of park users by classifying them with their park use frequency in terms of park use, management policy and perception, using the same survey results conducted in 2014 and 2020. Research was conducted on urban parks in Yangju, South Korea, and 740 in 2014 and 431 in 2000 survey results were used. After classifying the high-use and low-use groups according to park use frequency, this study compared the demographic differences and park use method differences according to the group, the recognition differences for the future park management direction between the two groups were analyzed and compared using statistical analysis by year. The results showed that the park's quantitative expansion and accessibility improvements were the most important issues in 2014, while the importance of park management, such as checking and improving aging facilities, providing various programs, and creating a themed neighborhood park that could reveal the identity of the area, was increased in 2020. Despite recognizing the importance of persistent management in the case of high-use groups, the results showed that they were less willing to participate in park management programs compared to less-use groups, which showed the need for a discussion of how to involve high-use groups for long term park management. This study contribute the body of literature that it seeks to understand differences of park user in terms of their park use frequency. However, in future studies, analyzing the differences of park users through a short-term study is required.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Campbell, L. K., E. S. Svendsen, N. F. Sonti and M. L. Johnson(2016). A social assessment of urban parkland: Analyzing park use and meaning to inform management and resilience planning. Environmental Science & Policy 62: 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.014
  2. Chen, Y., W. Yue and D. La Rosa(2020). Which communities have better accessibility to green space? An investigation into environmental inequality using big data. Landscape and Urban Planning 204: 103919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103919
  3. Choi, Y. E., J. H. Chon and J. A. Lee(2014). An analysis of design elements and satisfaction on the usability of city squares - Focused on Gwanghwamun Square and Geumbit Square -, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42(6): 111-123. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.6.111
  4. Eom, B. H. and S. M. Han(2011). Analysis of changes in citizen satisfaction with parks & green spaces in Daegu City, Korea, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 39(6): 67-75. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2011.39.6.067
  5. HK, Y. E., H. W. KO and C. E. HW(2017). Elderly satisfaction with planning and design of public parks in high density old districts: An ordered logit model. Landscape and Urban Planning 165: 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.006
  6. Jo, H. K., Y. H. Cho and T. W. Ahn(2003). Effects of urban greenspace on improving atmospheric environment - Focusing on Jung-gu in Seoul -, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 31(3): 83-90.
  7. Kang, E. J., J. S. Hong, S. B. Lee and Y. G. Kim(2014). The comparative studies on the visitor behavior based on type and scale of urban forest in Seoul - With a special reference to Bongje-san and Acha-san-, Korea Society of Environment and Ecology 28(1): 90-98.
  8. Kim, D. W., J. K. Kim and E. H. Jung(2010). An analysis of micro-climate environmental changes followed by establishment of an urban park- Focused on the Junggu in Daegu City, Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design 11(2): 77-94.
  9. Kim, J. E., C. Park, A. Y. Kim and H. G. Kim(2019). Analysis of behavioral characteristics by park types displayed in 3rd generation SNS, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 47(2): 49-58.
  10. Kim, J. H. and Y. G. Kim(2019). A case study on the UK park and green space policiesfor inclusive urban regeneration, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 47(5): 78-90.
  11. Kim, J. T. and J. H. Cho(2011). Recognition difference of local residents and tourists to urban park operation and management-With a special reference to the Wolmi Park in Incheon-, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 25(3): 432-441.
  12. Kim, S. K. and J. H. Lee(2019). A study on the park components affecting the satisfaction of park usage by user groups - Based on the analysis of the 2018 satisfaction survey of Hangang Park users -, Journal of the Korea Landscape Council 11(2): 21-33.
  13. Kim, Y. G.(2014). A study on the distributive equity of neighborhood urban park in Seoul viewed from green welfare, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42(3): 76-89. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.3.076
  14. Kim, Y. H., Y. W. An and S. B. Park(2012). A study on the analysis of urban parks management in the Busan city - Focusing on the main agent of management -, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(6): 127-139. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.6.127
  15. Kim, Y. I., J. G. Kim, J. S. An and A. H. Choi(2010). Citizen satisfaction model for urban parks and greens - A transactional approach in the case of Anyang City, Korea -, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 38(3): 62-74.
  16. Kim, Y. K. and G. M. Nam(2019). A study on factors influencing the residents' participation of urban regeneration: Focused on the mediating effect of place attachment, Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association 30(3): 43-65.
  17. Kwon, Y. S., J. W. Lee, H. B. Kim and J. W. Oh(2013). Comprehensive urban regeneration design strategy of abandoned railroad area through citizen participation - Focused on the case of Gwangyang Si abandoned railroad park, Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design 14(5): 47-63.
  18. Lee, J. H. and S. K. Kim(2018). Extraction of essential design elements for urban parks - Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 46(6): 41-48.
  19. Lee, J. H. and D. Matarrita-Cascante(2019). Gardeners' past gardening experience and its moderating effect on community garden participation. Sustainability 11(12): 3308.
  20. Park, K. H. and S. B. Park(2016). A preliminary study on usability of unmanned aerial vehicles in observing park users - Focused on urban parks in Busan -, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 44(4): 35-44. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2016.44.4.035
  21. Schule, S. A., K. M. Gabriel and G. Bolte(2017). Relationship between neighbourhood socioeconomic position and neighbourhood public green space availability: An environmental inequality analysis in a large German city applying generalized linear models. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 220(4), 711-718.
  22. Seo, H. J. and B. W. Jun(2011). Environmental equity analysis of the accessibility of urban neighborhood parks in Daegu city, The Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 14(4): 221-237.
  23. Sung, H. C. and S. Y. Hwang(2013). A preliminary study on assessment of urban parks and green zones of ecological attributes and responsiveness to climate change, The Korea Society For Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology 16(3): 107-117.
  24. Woo, K. S. and J. H. Suh(2020). A Time series analysis of urban park behavior using big data, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 48(1): 35-45. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2020.48.1.035
  25. Xie, J. S., K. F. Luo and D. Sun(2020). Urban parks as green buffers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability 12(17): 6751. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176751
  26. Yeom, S. J. and C. I. Park(2011). Satisfaction experienced in urban parks and green spaces according to their component and arrangement - A case study on Tama Newtown, Japan -, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 39(5): 12-20. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2011.39.5.012
  27. Zhang, Y., B. D. Moyle and X. Jin(2018). Fostering visitors' pro-environmental behaviour in an urban park. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 23(7): 691-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2018.1487457
  28. Zoh, K. J., Y. G. Kim and Y. H. Kim(2014). A study on visitor motivation and satisfaction of urban open space - In the case of waterfront open space in Seoul -, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42(1): 27-40. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.1.027
  29. Yangju City Government. https://yangju.go.k.(2021. Jan. 12). https://www.yangju.go.kr/www/selectBbsNttList.do?bbsNo=31&key=245