대한한방부인과학회지 (The Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology)

  • 제34권2호
  • /
  • Pages.108-123
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1229-4292(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-3619(eISSN)
대한한방부인과학회 (The Society of Korean Medicine Obstetrics and Gynecology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대한한방부인과학회지에 게재된 체계적 문헌고찰의 방법론 및 보고의 질 평가

A Methodological and Reporting Quality Assessment of the Systematic Reviews in the Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology

  • 서지혜 (세명대학교 한의과대학 한방부인과교실) ;
  • 강소현 (세명대학교 한의과대학 한방부인과교실) ;
  • 허다희 (세명대학교 한의과대학 한방부인과교실) ;
  • 이동녕 (세명대학교 한의과대학 한방부인과교실) ;
  • 김형준 (세명대학교 한의과대학 한방부인과교실)
  • Seo, Ji-Hye (Dept. of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Se-Myung University) ;
  • Kang, So-Hyeon (Dept. of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Se-Myung University) ;
  • Hur, Da-Hee (Dept. of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Se-Myung University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Nyung (Dept. of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Se-Myung University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeong-Jun (Dept. of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Se-Myung University)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.16
  • 심사 : 2021.05.28
  • 발행 : 2021.05.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the methodological and reporting quality of the systematic reviews in the Journal of Korean obstetrics and gynecology. Methods: Systematic reviews in the Journal of Korean obstetrics and gynecology were selected from January 1987 to February 2021, by searching Koreanstudies Information Service System (KISS) and the search system of the Society of Korean medicine obstetrics and gynecology. The methodological and reporting quality was assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) tool and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Results: Total of 19 systematic reviews were finally included for this study. The levels of methodological quality were low in 63.2% and very low in 36.8%. As a result of evaluating the reporting quality, 22 to 15 (average 18.6) items out of 27 items (81.5 to 55.6%) were reported. Conclusions: The results of a systematic review are helpful in giving a high level of evidence. In order to improve the quality of systematic reviews published in the Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology, it is necessary to perform and report according to the the PRISMA checklist and AMSTAR 2.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994;309(6954):597-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597
  2. Pearson A, Jordan Z, Munn Z. Translational science and evidence-based healthcare: a clarification and reconceptualization of how knowledge is generated and used in healthcare. Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012(1):e792519.
  3. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):86-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9
  4. Moher D, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354(9193):1896-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
  5. Liberati A, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
  6. Shea BJ, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
  7. Shea BJ, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008
  8. Kim JH, Kim AK. A quality assessment of meta-analyses of nursing in South Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013;43(6):736-45. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.6.736
  9. Shim SB, Lee JA, Lee HL, Evaluation of the Reporting and Methodological Quality of the Systematic Review from the Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine. J Pediatr Korean Med. 2020;34(1):26-36. https://doi.org/10.7778/JPKM.2020.34.1.26
  10. Song EH, et al. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in Journal of Society of Preventive Korean Medicine. J Prev Med Public Health. 2019;23(2):67-76.
  11. Haidich AB. Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia. 2010;14(Suppl 1):29-37.
  12. Kim SH, et al. Recent Acupuncture Therapy for Polycystic Ovary Syndromes : Systematic Review. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2014;27(2):71-82. https://doi.org/10.15204/jkobgy.2014.27.2.071
  13. Baek SE, et al. Systematic Review of Fumigation Therapy for Atrophic Vaginitis. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2016;29(1):92-101. https://doi.org/10.15204/jkobgy.2016.29.1.092
  14. Bae JE, Yoon YJ. The Effect of Integrated Medicine for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Subfertility Patients; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2017;30(4):59-76. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2017.30.4.059
  15. Jeong SY, et al. The Effectiveness of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Treatment for Mastitis: A Systematic Review. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2017;30(3):29-39. https://doi.org/10.15204/jkobgy.2017.30.1.029
  16. Kim YJ, et al. The Clinical Effect on Acupuncture Treatment of Postpartum Hypogalactia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2017;30(3):79-91. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2017.30.3.079
  17. Lee HI, et al. The Effectiveness of Moxibustion Treatment for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2017;30(2):107-19. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2017.30.2.107
  18. Park NC, et al. Electroacupuncture for Treatment of Primary Dysmenorrhea: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2017;30(2):81-92. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2017.30.2.081
  19. Song MH, Hong KK, Choi CM. Systematic Review of Acupoint Catgut Embedding Therapy for Climacteric Hot Flush. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2017;30(2):71-80. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2017.30.2.071
  20. Park EJ, Jo HG, Choi JH. Traditional Herbal Medicine for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding versus Western Medicine: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2018;31(4):110-27. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2018.31.4.110
  21. Park KD, Bae JE, Yoon YJ. Systematic Review of Herbal Medicine Fumigation Treatment for Mycotic Vaginitis (Candida Vaginitis). J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2018;31(3):20-32. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2018.31.3.020
  22. Yoon JG, et al. Electroacupuncture for Treatment of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2018;31(4):39-53. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2018.31.4.039
  23. Bae JE, Park KD, Yoon YJ. Acupoint Sticking Therapy for Endometriosis ; Systematic Review. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2019;32(3):162-73. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2019.32.3.162
  24. Jung JW, Yoon YJ. The Effect of Herbal Medicine for Adenomyosis patients : A Systematic Review. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2019;32(4):87-101. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2019.32.4.087
  25. Nam EY. Review on Clinical Studies of Traditional Korean Medicine Treatment for Atrophic Vaginitis. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2019;32(3):245-62. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2019.32.3.245
  26. Park EJ, Jo HG. Application of Traditional East Asian Herbal Medicine for Atrophic Vaginitis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2019;32(3):227-44. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2019.32.3.227
  27. Ha SJ, et al. Electroacupuncture for Women with Overactive Bladder:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2020;33(3):1-19. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2020.33.3.001
  28. Kim SG, Yoon YJ. Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Therapeutic Effects of Herb Medicine for Premenstrual Syndrome. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2020;33(4):36-55. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2020.33.4.036
  29. Lee SJ, et al. Herbal Medicine for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2020;33(2):44-62. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2020.33.2.044
  30. Park HR, Jo HG. The Efficacy of Moxibustion for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: a Systematic Review. J Korean Obstet Gynecol. 2020;33(4):1-22. https://doi.org/10.15204/JKOBGY.2020.33.4.001
  31. Petrie A, Bulman JS, Osborn JF. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Br Dent J. 2003;194(2):73-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809877
  32. Sauerland S, Seiler CM. Role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in evidence-based medicine. World J Surg. 2005;29(5):582-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7917-7
  33. Whiting P, et al. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Recenti Prog Med. 2018;109(9):421-31.
  34. Tian J, et al. The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;85:50-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.004
  35. Tian ZY, et al. An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Acupuncture for Post-acute Stroke Dysphagia. Geriatrics (Basel). 2019;4(4):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics4040068
  36. Li YX, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Acupuncture for Migraine: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Pain Res Manag. 2020;2020:3825617.
  37. Tawfik GM, et al. Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):213. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01094-9