디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권6호
  • /
  • Pages.225-232
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

자아정체성의 유형이 페이스북 의견 지도자와의 준사회적 상호작용 및 정보공유 의도에 미치는 효과

The Effects of Types of Self-Identity on Quasi-social Interactions and Information Sharing Intentions with Facebook Opinion Leaders

  • 박선경 (남서울대학교 뷰티보건학) ;
  • 강윤지 (인하대학교 미디어커뮤니케이션학과)
  • Park, Sunkyung (Department of Beauty Health, NamSeoul University) ;
  • Kang, Yoon Ji (Department of Media and Communication, Inha University)
  • 투고 : 2021.03.10
  • 심사 : 2021.06.20
  • 발행 : 2021.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

소셜 네트워크 서비스 상에서 의견지도자는 다양한 이슈에 대한 여론 형성을 주도하고 있다. 그러나 어떠한 개인적 특성을 통해 이용자들이 의견지도자와 상호작용하며, 행위 의도를 보이는지 파악하는 연구는 부족하였다. 이에 본 연구는 페이스북 이용자들의 자아정체성 성향에 따른 페이스북 내 의견 지도자와의 준사회적 상호작용과 정보공유 의도에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 소셜 네트워크 서비스 이용자들은 이슈 유형에 따라 인식과 행동을 달리 하기 때문에 이슈 유형을 생활문화 영역과 정치 영역으로 구분하여 온라인 설문조사를 실시하였다. 연구결과, 생활문화 영역과 정치 영역에서 개인 정체성은 준사회적 상호작용에 유의미한 긍정적 영향을 미쳤고, 집단 정체성은 준사회적 상호작용에 부정적 영향을 미쳤다. 또한 정보공유 의도와 관련하여 생활문화 영역에서만 자아정체성(사회 정체성·집단 정체성)의 유의미한 효과를 확인하였다. 준사회적 상호작용은 모든 이슈 영역에서 유의미한 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것을 확인하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 향후 페이스북 이용자들의 자아정체성 유형에 의한 의견지도자 마케팅 전략에 차이를 고려할 필요가 있음을 나타낸다. 더불어 기업적 차원에서 이슈 유형의 구분 없이 준사회적 상호작용 수준을 높이는 것이 효과적인 결과에 도출할 수 있음을 시사한다.

Nowadays, opinion leaders influence the formation of public opinion on various issues in social network services. There has been a lack of research on the personal characteristics that inspire users to interact with opinion leaders and show intent to act. This paper verifies how the disposition of Facebook users' self-identity affects the quasi-social interaction with opinion leaders on Facebook and the intention to share information. As the perception and behavior of users on social media platforms differ depending on the type of issue, an online survey was conducted by classifying issue types into life culture and political sectors. Research found that personal identity had a significant positive effect on quasi-social interactions in the life culture and politics sectors, while group identity negatively affected quasi-social interactions. In addition, the intention to share information was confirmed to have a significant effect only in the life and culture areas of self-identity (social and group identity). Quasi-social interaction was confirmed to have a significant positive effect on all issue areas. The results of this study suggest the need to consider variations in opinion leader marketing strategies based on the types of self-identity of Facebook users in the future. In addition, the study shows that raising the level of quasi-social interaction at the corporate level without distinction of issue types can lead to effective results.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Z. Xuan. & J. Lee. (2016). A Study on China's SNS Opinion Leader through Social Data. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology. 6(9), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.14257/ajmahs.2016.09.54
  2. W. Lee., M. Cha., & H. Yang. (2011). Network Properties of Social Media Influentials: Focusing on the Korean Twitter Community. Journal of Communication Reserch, 48(2), 44-79. https://doi.org/10.22174/jcr.2011.48.2.44
  3. S. H. Seok., M. C. Kim., S. H. Ryu., & E. J. Jeong. (2013). A Study of the Effect of Celebrity-Mediated Networks on Social Capital: Focusing on Social Network Service Users. Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, 30(1), 93-143.
  4. S. H. Han., & H. S. Lee. (2013). Understanding the Role of Parasocial Interaction on User Behavior in Social Network Site(SNS): Focused on Weak-Tie Relationship. Journal of the Korea Data Analysis Society, 15(4), 2203-2217.
  5. M. Y. Li., Y. J. Park., & H. S. Hwang. (2015). Impacts of Special Motives and Para-Social Interaction with Celebrities on User Satisfaction with SNS: A Case Study of Sina Weibo. Korean Telecommunications Policy Review, 22(3), 51-82.
  6. Y. Park., Y. Lee., H. J. Cho., E. E. S. Kim. (2020). How Perceived Interactivity between Instagram Micro-influencers and Their Followers Impacts the Effects of Sponsorship Disclosure: Mediating Role of Perceived Authenticity and Identification. The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 21(4), 603-631. https://doi.org/10.21074/KJLCAP.2020.21.4.603
  7. J. Y. Kim. (2017). The Impact of Personality and Self-Identity on Online Information Acquisition and Information Transmission and SNS Usage. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(11), 433-440. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.11.433
  8. N. D. Kim., M. Y. Jeon., J. H. Choi., H. E. Lee., J. Y. Lee., S. Y. Kim., S. J. Lee., Y. H. Seo., & J. Y. Kwon.(2020). Trend Korea 2020. Miraebook Publishing.
  9. H. C. Kelman. (1961). Processes of opinion change, Public Opinion Quarterly, 25(1), 57-78. https://doi.org/10.1086/266996
  10. D. I. Shin., & G. Y. Kwak. (2019). The Influence of Social Capital and Attitude on the Expression of Opinions on Social Media: The Theory of Silent Lineage and Interpretation Level. Korea Business Information Society Conference, 318-328.
  11. H. J. Kim. (2018). The effect of knowledge level and self-presentation propensity on posting opinions online about social issues ; Focusing on online discussion culture. The Journal of Image and Cultural Contents, 15, 113-149. https://doi.org/10.24174/jicc.2018.10.15.113
  12. E. H. Erikson, & J. Erikson. (1981). On Generativity and Identity: From a Conversation with Erik and Joan Erikson. Harvard Educational Review, 51(2), 249-269. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.51.2.g211757u27732p67
  13. M. B. Brewer., & W. Gardner. (1996). Who is This "we"? Levels of Collective Identity and Self Representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 71(1), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
  14. Y. J. Kim. (2011). Facebook Uses and Gratifications. Media, Gender & Culture, (20), 71-105.
  15. D. Horton., & R. R. Wohl. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance, Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
  16. B. J. Seo., M. G. Kim., & C. H. Lee. (2018). The Effect of TV Viewers' Perceived Similarity, Wishful Identification, and Para-Social Interaction on Tourism Attitude: In the Case of a Travel-Reality Show. The Journal of Tourism Studies, 30(1), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.21581/jts.2018.02.30.1.29
  17. E. H. Kim., D. Yoo., & S. J. Doh. (2019). Building Brand Loyalty on Facebook Brand Fan Pages : Mediating Role of Parasocial Interaction and Moderating Efffect of Self-construal. Journal of Media Economics & Culture, 17(1), 47-82. https://doi.org/10.21328/JMEC.2019.2.17.1.47
  18. Y. Kwon., & J. Lim. (2020). The Influence of Parasocial Interaction on Adolescents' Ego-Identity and Ego-Resilience: Focusing on Sequential Dual Mediating Effects of Parasocial Relationships and Peer Attachment. Journal of Korea Home Management Association, 38(3), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.7466/jkhma.2020.38.3.83
  19. Y. J. Kim. (2014). The Impact of Structural and Relational Social Capital on SNS User Satisfaction and Continuous Information Sharing Intention. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 19(12), 287-298. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2014.19.12.287
  20. E. J. Bae., M. Jeon., & I. G. Shin. (2020). The Effects of SNS Storytelling Composition Factors on Para-social Interaction, Attitude and WOM Intention: A Case Study of Beauty YouTube. The Korea Contents Society, 20(1), 16-24.
  21. J. H. Lee., & H. W. Cha. (2016). Influence of Issue Types, Affective Involvement about Issue, Norm Types on the Anger Intensity and the Crisis Communication Effect. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 91-132.
  22. Cheek, J. M., & Briggs, S. R. (2013). Aspects of Identity Questionnaire(AIQ-IV). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved from www.midss.ie
  23. A. M. Rubin., E. M. Perse., & R. A. Powell. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x
  24. G. W. Book., R. W. Zmud., Y. Kim., & J. Lee. (2005). Behavioral intention formation knowledge sharing: Examining roles of extrinsic motivators. Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate, Mis Auarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
  25. M. Xu., & J. Kim. (2018). Analysis of User's Attitude Depending on the Difference in Type of Information Provided by Sina Weibo: Focused on Users' Attitude, Purchase Intention, Sharing Intention of SNS Feature. Journal of Communication Design, 63, 8-18.