Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship between the Spatial Allocation of Developed Area and the Heat Wave Phenomenon: The Case of Five Metropolitan Cities

시가화지역 공간상 위치분배와 폭염현상과의 관계성: 5개 광역시 사례

  • Kang, Sangjun (Department of Urban Planning.Real Estate, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 강상준 (국립강릉원주대학교 도시계획.부동산학과)
  • Received : 2021.04.01
  • Accepted : 2021.05.25
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To better understand the heat wave phenomenon in the urban areas, it is desirable to explore the relationship between spatial allocation of land use and the heat wave. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the ranking correlation between heat wave days and developed types, specifically, core and islet developments. The methods employed are morphological spatial pattern, spatial autocorrelation, and spearman ranking correlation analyses by using the 30-year annual heat wave day records forthe five metropolitans. This research indicates that a fragmented development pattern including islets has mostly negative effects to the urban heat wave phenomenon. It means there is a relation between development pattern and heat wave.

도시지역 폭염에 대한 보다 나은 이해를 위해서는 토지이용의 총량적 이해와 더불어서 토지이용의 공간적 위치분배와 폭염현상과의 관계성 이해도 필요하다. 본 연구의 목적은 군집개발과 파편화된 개발이 폭염일수와 순위상관관계를 보이고 있는지를 살펴보는 것이다. 주요연구방법으로는 형태학적공간패턴, 공간자기상관성, 스피어만상관성 분석을 이용하였다. 연구대상지는 대구, 광주, 울산, 부산, 대전광역시이며 폭염지표는 30년간 연간폭염일수로 설정하였다. 본 연구는 군집개발 유무보다는 나홀로 개발 등의 파편화개발방식이 폭염에 부정적이라는 점을 보여주고 있으며 이는 곧 개발형태가 폭염과 관계가 있음을 의미한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구입니다(NRF-2020S1A3A2A01095064)

References

  1. Anselin L. 1995. Local indicators of spatial association (LISA). Geographical Analysis 27: 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
  2. Antrop M. 2004. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 67(1-4): 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4
  3. Antrop M. 2000. Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe. Landscape Ecology 15: 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008151109252
  4. Bae MK, Kim BE, Lee CY. 2020. Analysis on the spatial relationship between the residential area of the vulnerable groups and the hazardous area during the heat wave. Korea Environmental Policy and Administration 28(3): 243-280. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2020.28.3.243
  5. Braden JB. 2004. The downstream economic benefits of storm water management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 130(6): 498-505. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:6(498)
  6. Capra F. 1996. The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems.
  7. Carsjens GJ, van der Knaap W. 2002. Strategic land-use allocation: dealing with spatial relationships and fragmentation of agriculture. Landscape and Urban Planning 58(2-4): 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00219-5
  8. Chen B, Chen G. 2006. Ecological footprint accounting based on emergy: a case study of the Chinese society. Ecological Modeling 198: 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.022
  9. Chen LD, Messing I, Zhang SR, Fu BJ, Ledin S. 2003. Land use evaluation and scenario analysis towards sustainable planning on the Loess plateau in China - case study in a small catchment. Catena 54(1-2): 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(03)00071-7
  10. Cho HS, Joung YJ, Choi MJ. 2014. Effects of the urban spatial characteristics on urban heat island. Korea Environmental Policy and Administration 22(2): 27-43. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2014.22.4.27
  11. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). 1993. Guidelines for land use planning.
  12. Jo YA. 2009. Empirical study on the relationship between compact city and transportation energy consumption: the case of 7 metropolitan cities. Korean Society and Public Adminstration 19(4): 113-132. [Korean Literature]
  13. Kang SJ. 2020. Exploratory analysis for the concentration of PM10 air particulates and the morphological pattern of greeinfra: the case of Gyeonggido.GRI Review 22(4): 25-40. [Korean Literature]
  14. Kang SJ, Kwon TJ. 2019. The changing spatial patterns of new urban development areas in Gangneung city in Korea. Urban Design 20(2): 65-75. [Korean Literature]
  15. Kang SJ, Kwon TJ. 2017. Spatial relations of the urban expansion intensity and flooded buildings. 37(4): 759-764. [Korean Literature]
  16. Kang SJ, Kim Jo. 2015. Morphological analysis of green infrastructure in Seoul metropolitan area, Korea. Journal of Landscape and Ecological Engineering 11(2): 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-014-0268-5
  17. Kim HC, Ahn KY. 2011. The effects of compact city planning strategies on commuting distance of different income levels: focused on Seoul, Korea. Urban Design 12(1): 55-70. [Korean Literature]
  18. Kim JI, Kwon JH. 2013. The spatial changes of commuting pattern and its effect on jobshousing mismatch: The case of Seoul metropolitan region. Korea Transport 20(4): 79-90. [Korean Literature]
  19. Kim JS, Kang JE. 2018. Effects of compact spatial characteristics on the urban thermal environment. Urban Design 19(1): 21-36. [Korean Literature]
  20. Korea Meterological Adminstration (KMA). 2020. Korean climate change assessment report. [Korean Literature]
  21. Lee NY, Cho YS, Lim JY. 2014. Effect of climate change on mortality rate analysis of vulnerable populations. Health and Social Welfare Review 34(1): 456-484. https://doi.org/10.15709/HSWR.2014.34.1.456
  22. Ligmann-Zielinska A, Church RL, Jankowski P. 2008. Spatial optimization as a generative technique for sustainable multiobjective land-use allocation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 22: 601-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810701587495
  23. Nam KC, Kim HS, Son MS. 2008. A study on the correlation between compact of population and transport energy: An application of compact Index. Journal of Korea Planning Association 43(2): 155-168. [Korean Literature]
  24. Neuman M. 2005. The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25(1): 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04270466
  25. Riitters KH, Vogt P, Soille P, Kozak J, Estreguil C. 2007. Neutral model analysis of landscape patterns from mathematical morphology. Landscape Ecology 22: 1033-1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9089-3
  26. Salvati L, Moretti V, Sabbi A, Ippolito A, Ferrara A. 2015. A multivariate assessment of fringe landscape dynamics in Rome, Italy, and implications for peri-urban forest conservation. Rendiconti Lincei. 26: 587-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-015-0401-x
  27. Shirabe T. 2005. Classification of spatial properties for spatial allocation modeling. Geoinformatica 9: 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-005-1285-1
  28. Soille P, Vogt P. 2009. Morphological segmentation of binary patterns. Pattern Recognition Letters 30: 456-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2008.10.015
  29. Song BK, Park KH. 2012. Analysis of heat island characteristics considering urban space at nighttime. Journal of Geographic Information Studies 15(1): 133-143. [Korean Literature]
  30. Stone B, Rodgers MO. 2001. Urban form and thermal efficiency: how the design of cities influences the urban heat island effect. Journal of the American Planning Association 67(2): 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976228
  31. Vogt P. 2010. User guide of GUIDOS.
  32. Vogt P, Joseph J Ferrari, Todd L, Robert G, Kurt R, Katarzyna O. 2009. Mapping functional connectivity, Ecological Indicators 9(1): 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.01.011
  33. Vogt P, Riitters K, Iwanowiski M, Estreguil C, Kozak J, Soille P. 2007. Mapping landscape corridors. Ecological Indicators 7(2): 481-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.11.001
  34. Wickham J, Riitters K, Wade T, Vogt P. 2010. A national assessment of GI and change for the conterminous United States using morphological image processing. Landscape and Urban Planning 94: 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.003
  35. Yin RS, Xiang Q, Xu JT, Deng XZ. 2010. Modeling the driving forces of the land use and land cover changes along the upper Yangtze river of China. Environmental Management 45: 454-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9377-6
  36. Zambon I, Serra P, Grigoriadis E, Carlucci M, Salvati L. 2017. Emerging urban centrality: An entropy-based indicator of polycentric development and economic growth. Land Use Policy 68: 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.063