정보관리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for information Management)

  • 제38권2호
  • /
  • Pages.65-86
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1013-0799(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-2073(eISSN)
한국정보관리학회 (Korean Society for Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

동시출현단어 분석을 활용한 한국어교육에서의 학습전략 연구 동향 탐색

Exploring the Research Trends of Learning Strategies in Korean Language Education Using Co-word Analysis

  • 허영수 (연세대학교 언어정보학협동과정) ;
  • 박지홍 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2021.05.17
  • 심사 : 2021.06.12
  • 발행 : 2021.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

외국어 교육 분야에서 학습자는 교육의 한 축을 이루는 중요한 부분이지만 한국어교육의 경우 교육 내용, 교수 방법, 교재 등에 비해 학습자 연구는 미진한 면이 있었다. 이에 학습자 연구, 그중에서도 학습전략 연구가 어떻게 이루어져 왔는지를 분석하고 더 나은 교육을 위해 연구가 필요한 부분을 도출해 보는 것은 의미가 있다. 본 연구에서는 한국어교육 분야에서 학습전략 연구의 현황을 분석하기 위해 학술지와 학위논문의 제목에 대해 동시출현단어 분석을 진행하였다. 연구 결과, 한국어 학습자의 학습전략 관련 가장 많은 연구가 이루어진 분야는 '읽기'이고, 대상은 '중국인 유학생'과 '결혼이민자'였다. 또한, 연구 주제에 대한 서브그룹 분석 결과를 보면 주요 서브그룹이 네 개가 나타나는데 '학문 목적 읽기' 관련 그룹, '요청, 거절, 대화 등 화행' 관련 그룹, '쓰기' 관련 그룹, '어휘, 듣기' 관련 그룹이다. 이를 통해 한국어 학습자의 학습전략과 관련해 연구자들의 주요 관심 분야가 '읽기, 화행' 등임을 알 수 있으며, 연구 대상과 연구 분야가 부분적으로 편중되어 있는 상황이므로 다양한 분야와 대상으로 연구를 확대할 필요가 있음을 알 수 있다.

In the foreign language education, learners are an important part of education, however in the Korean language education, the study of learners was insufficient compared to the contents of education, teaching methods and textbooks. Therefore, it is meaningful to analyze how learner research, especially learning strategy research, has been conducted and derive areas that need research for better education. In this study, co-word analysis was conducted on the titles of academic journals and dissertations in order to analyze the learning strategy research in Korean language education. I found it is about "reading" that the most studies related to Korean language learners' learning strategies were conducted and those studies' subjects mostly were 'Chinese international students' and 'marriage-immigrants'. In addition, the results of the subgroup analysis on the research topic show four major subgroups: a group related to 'reading for academic purposes', a group related to 'request, rejection, conversation, etc.', a group related to 'writing', and a group related to 'vocabulary, listening'. This shows that the researchers' major interests in studying Korean learner's strategies are "reading" and "speaking" and their studies have been concentrated in the specific areas. Therefore, it is necessary for researchers to study various functions and subjects in Korean language learner's learning strategies.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2019S1A5C2A03083499).

참고문헌

  1. Bang, Seongwon (2021). Analysis of Research Trends on Online Korean Language Education - Using topic modeling and semantic network analysis. Journal of Korean Language Education, 18(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.18209/IAKLE.2007.18.1.1
  2. Choi, Yun Hoi (2015). An Analysis on Immigrant Wives' Strategies for Learning Korean Language. Graduate School of Culture Creation, Kyung Hee Cyber University, Seoul.
  3. Ham, Eun Joo (2015). An Analysis of Trends in Korean Vocabulary Teaching and Learning Strategies: Focused on Theses and Dissertations. The Graduate School of Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  4. Jang, Ji Yeon (2017). An Analysis of Research Trends in Theses and Dissertations in Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language: Focusing on Strategies for Teaching and Learning Reading. The Graduate School of Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  5. Jang, Kyungwan (2020). A Study on the research trend of Korean language education for children of multicultural families: Focusing on the language network. Journal of LearnerCenterd Curriculum and Instruction, 20(5), 359-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.5.359
  6. Kang, Beomil & Park, Ji-Hong (2013). Profiling and Co-word Analysis of Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language Domain. Journal of the Korean society for information management, 30(4), 195-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM. 2013.30.4.195
  7. Kang, Seung Hae (1999). Language Learning Strategies and Achievements of Korean Language Learners. Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language, 23(1), 89-115.
  8. Kang, Seung Hae (2017). Korean Academic Research Domains Identified by Analyzing Prior Korean language education Research. Korean Education, 110, 121-146. https://doi.org/10.15734/koed..110.201703.121
  9. Kim, Eun Sil & Kang, Seung Hae (2019). Research Trend Analysis Focused on the Evaluation of Korean Language Education as a Foreign Language: Focused on co-word analysis. Journal of Korean Language Education, 30(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.18209/iakle.2019.30.3.1
  10. Kim, Eun Sil (2016). Co-word Network Analysis focused on thesis keywords in the fields of Korean Language and Literature, Korean Language Education, Korean Language Education as a Foreign Language. The Graduate School of Education, Yonsei University, Seoul.
  11. Kim, Hyeyoung & Park, Ji-Hong (2020). A Network Analysis of the Library Bill Co-sponsorship in the Legislative Process of the 19th National Assembly of Korea. Journal of the Korean society for information management, 37(2), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.2.001
  12. Kim, Hyoju (2017). A Study on the Language Learning Strategies of Vietnamese Korean Learners (석사학위). The Graduate School of Education, Sangmyung University, Seoul.
  13. Kwak, Ki-young (2014). Social network analysis. Seoul: Cheongram
  14. Lee, Jung Hee, Ahn, Soo-Hyun, & Lee, Sang-Joon (2019). Exploring the research trend of 'evaluation in Korean language education' using semantic network analysis. The Fifth International Conference on Korean Language Education, 304-311.
  15. Liu Yanyan (2020). A Study on the Trends of Error Analysis Research on Korean Language for Chinese Learners -Focusing on Topic Modeling and Language Network Analysis-. Journal of Korean Language Education, 31(1), 23-49. https://doi.org/10.18209/iakle.2020.31.1.23
  16. Shon, Sung Hee (2011). A Study on Language Learning Strategies of Korean Language Learners. The Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.2.001
  17. Won, Mi-Jin (2010). Comparing the Use of Language Learning Strategies -A Exploratory Factor Analysis on KSL Learners. Korean Language and Literature in International Context, 48(0), 277-313.
  18. Yun, Teresa (2019). A Study on Analysis of Research Trends in Korean Language Education focused on Learners - Using Language Network Analysis - Graduate School of Culture Creation, Kyung Hee Cyber University, Seoul.
  19. Zhou Yan, Quan Honghua, & Lee, Junghee (2019). Analysis of Korean Language Education Research Trends for Chinese Korean Language Learners on text mining - Based on Co-occurrence & Social network analysis. Bilingual Research, 75(0), 197-222. https://doi.org/10.17296/korbil.2019..75.197
  20. Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Social Networks, Science Direct. 27(1), 55-71. http://doi.org/ssl.access.yonsei.ac.kr:808010.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008
  21. Borgatti, S. P., Everett M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. CA: Sage Publications. http://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2016.1209400
  22. Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (2005). Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Gomez, D., Figueira, J. R., & Eusebio, A. (2013). Modeling centrality measures in social network analysis using bi-criteria network flow optimization problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(2), 354-365. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.027
  24. He, Q. (1999). Knowledge Discovery Through co-Word Analysis. LIBRARY TRENDS. 48(1), 133-159.
  25. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.