DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Revitalization of Private Mediation System - Lessons from the Italy's recent Via-Mediation mechanism -

민간형 조정제도 활성화에 관한 연구 - 이태리의 '완화된' 조정전치주의 도입을 중심으로 -

  • 이재우 (대한상사중재원, 고려대학교) ;
  • 오현석 (계명대학교 경제통상학부 국제통상전공)
  • Received : 2021.02.15
  • Accepted : 2021.02.26
  • Published : 2021.03.01

Abstract

As our society and industry develop, disputes are becoming ever more complicated and diversified to the point that it is alleged that dispute resolution by court proceedings has certain limits and setbacks. Therefore, it is commonly suggested that mediation by a qualified mediator should come as an alternative method, and there have been many attempts to establish and provide mediation service in the courts and government authorities. To comply with a party's autonomy, which is the essential basis of mediation, and to promote the use of mediation, it is highly recommended that private mediation, rather than court-driven or administrative mediation, shall take the initiative. In the meantime, despite a number of academic research and attempts to increase the awareness and use of mediation nationwide, we have not yet seen meaningful developments due to the longstanding misunderstanding and discredit of mediation. In contrast, Italy has begun to revitalize mediation by enacting 'Legislative Decree No. 28/2020' following the 'Directive 2008/52EC' of the European Parliament and encouraging the so-called via-mediation policy. It is acknowledged to have significantly contributed to the development of private mediation in Italy and the increased use of mediation as a dispute resolution method. It shall be particularly noted that Italy's mediation proceedings have certain traits, including preliminary mediation meetings, mandatory involvement of legal counsel, and tax benefits for the settled cases by mediation. Italy's efforts would provide people with meaningful lessons and perspectives. As society strives to promote private mediation to distribute and utilize the judicial resources' inefficient ways, institutions need to develop practical measures to increase the number of civil and commercial disputes in the mediation proceedings. To that end, legislative efforts to enact relevant laws necessary to provide incentives to disputing parties and establish integrated education and certification programs to train qualified mediators need to start soon.

Keywords

References

  1. 강수미, "행정형 ADR의 현황과 개선방안", 「중재연구」 제25권 제4호, 한국중재학회, 2015.
  2. 고승환, "조정 활성화를 위한 법원이 역할 및 민사조정법 개정방향", 대법원-한국조정학회 공동학술대회 토론자료, 2016.
  3. 김상찬, "우리나라의 환경분쟁조정제도에 관한 연구", 「중재연구」 제21권 제3호, 한국중재학회, 2011.
  4. 김상찬, "ADR 제도 활성화를 위한 변호사의 역할에 관한 연구", 법무부 연구용역 보고서, 2016.
  5. 법무부, "ADR기본법 제정방향 및 현행 ADR기구의 합리적 운영방안", 2015.
  6. 오대성, "민사조정의 운영실태와 그 활성화방안에 관한 법사회학적 연구", 「중재연구」 제17권 제2호, 한국중재학회, 2007.
  7. 오재창, "민간형 조정 활성화를 통한 소송과 조정의 균형 모색", 저스티스 (182-2), 2021.
  8. 오재창, "사법부의 관점 및 정책의 전환이 절실함", 대한변호사협회 25회 법의 지배를 위한 변호사대회 토론문, 2016.
  9. 이로리, "Mediation'과 'Conciliation'의 개념에 관한 비교법적 연구", 「중재연구」 제19권 제2호, 한국중재학회, 2009.
  10. 이병준, "소비자법 내에서의 소비자기본법상 집단분쟁조정제도의 역할과 과제", 「중재연구」 제18권 제3호, 한국중재학회, 2008.
  11. 현소혜, 성균관대 법학전문대학원의 법원연계형 조정현황과 시사점, 조정학회 2017 학술대회 자료.
  12. 홍성규, "일본 ADR법의 주요내용과 시사점", 「무역학회지」 제32권 제2호, 한국무역학회, 2007.
  13. Augusta IANNINI, "ITALIAN LEGISLATION ON MEDIATION", European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs, April 2011.
  14. Giovanni Matteucci, "ANDATORY MEDIATION, THE ITALIAN EXPERIENCE", Revista Eletronica de Direito Processual, Vol. 16, 2015.
  15. Giovanni Matteucci, "Mediation and judiciary in Italy 2019", Asia Pacific Mediation Journal, 2019.
  16. Giuseppe De Palo and Leonardo D'Urso, "Achieving a Balanced Relationship between Mediation and Judicial Proceedings, in European Parliament, The implementation of the mediation directive", 2016.
  17. Leonardo D'Urso, 'Italy's 'Required Initial Mediation Session': Bridging The Gap between Mandatory and Voluntary Mediation', Alternatives Vol. 36(Issue 4), 2018.