DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Maritime Environment Impact Assessment of Offshore Floating Wind Power in Ulsan - A Focus on Habitat Equivalence Analysis -

울산 부유식 해상풍력단지 조성에 따른 환경피해의 경제적 가치추정 - 서식지 등가성 분석법을 중심으로 -

  • Choi, Su-Young (Graduate School of Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Moon, Beom-Sik (Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Goun (Division of Maritime Transportation Science, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
  • Received : 2021.04.30
  • Accepted : 2021.05.17
  • Published : 2021.06.30

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to provide an objective evaluation standard for the assessment of marine spatial characteristics via Ulsan floating offshore wind power project using HEA.. Various levels of damage occur in the waters (5,017.6) near the floating offshore wind power terminals in Ulsan, including commercial damage, ecological destruction and reduction in quality of life due to seascape damage. Alternative restoration projects for calculating the economic value of damage were selected including artificial reef projects and estimates based on HEA. For basic households with a 4.5% social discount rate and a 100% maturity index over four years, the damage was approximately 457 hundred million won. The HEA in this study resolves the possible irrationality in the evaluation of marine spatial characteristics, since the value is calculated based on objective and clear DATA. Therefore, the study results are intended to facilitate conflict resolution between stakeholders in the future during the implementation of the marine spatial plan.

본 연구의 목적은 울산 부유식 해상풍력발전단지를 대상으로 서식지 등가성 분석법(Habitat Equivalency Analysis : HEA)을 적용한 가치평가를 통해 해당 해양공간 특성평가를 위한 객관적인 평가기준 제시에 있다. 울산 부유식 해상풍력발전단지 설립으로 인해 사용이 금지된 해역(5,017.6ha)에서는 상업적 피해, 생태계 파괴 등 여러 피해가 발생한다. 피해의 경제적 가치 규모 산정을 위한 대체 복원사업을 인공어초사업으로 선정하고 이를 HEA로 추정하였다. 추정 결과, 사회적 할인율 4.5%, 4년째부터 성숙도 100%를 기본 가정으로 한 경우 피해액은 약 457억원으로 나타났다. 본 연구에 사용된 HEA는 객관적이고 명확한 DATA를 기본으로 가치를 산정하기 때문에 해양공간 특성평가 시 발생할 수 있는 불합리성을 해결할 수 있을 것이다. 따라서, 본 연구의 결과는 향후, 해양공간계획의 시행에서 발생 가능한 이해관계자들 간의 갈등 해소에 도움이 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, J. D.(2013), A study on the Economic Effectiveness of the Artificial Fish Reef Project in the Tae-an Marine Ranching, The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration, Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 103-109.
  2. Hong, J. H. and Eom, Y. S.(2011), Estimating Demand for Goods Using Survey Method : Issue and Application to the Valuation of Environmental Satellite Project, Journal of Korea Economic Analysis, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1-7. pp. 1-72.
  3. Jang, K. Y.(2019), Floating Offshore Wind power Energy - Breakthrough for Renewable Energy, POSCO Research Institute, POSRI Issue Report.
  4. Jo, S. H.(2014), Status of installation of offshore wind power generation system of 5.5MW class in Korea, The Journal of Electrical World Monthly Magazine, pp. 49-52.
  5. Kim, T. G.(2016), Study on Efficient Port Environmental Management for Sustainable Port Operation(I) : Case Study of Marine Environments and Natural Resources Impacts by Busan New Port Development, KINPR, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 401-412.
  6. Korea Energy Economic Institute(2015), Estimation of proper social discount rate and social cost of carbon in Korea.
  7. Ministry of Economy and Finance(2019), General Guidelines for Conducting Preliminary Feasibility Study.
  8. Ministry of Economy and Finance(2020), The Korean New Deal.
  9. Ministry of Ocean Maritime and Fisheries(2018), Law of Marine Spatial Management and Plan.
  10. Ministry of Ocean Maritime and Fisheries(2019), Guidance of Marine Spatial Estimation.
  11. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(1995), Habitat Equivalency Analysis : An Overview, Damage Assessment and Restoration Program National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Department of Commerce, pp. 5-14.
  12. Seo, S. H., Lee, Y. K., Lee, I. H. and Kim, D. K.(2007), Field Investigation on the Efficiency of the Artificial Steel Reefs, Korea Society of Ocean Engineers, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 61-67.
  13. Shaw, W. D. and Wlodarz, M.(2013), Ecosystems, Ecological Restoration and Economics : Does Habitat or Resource Equivalency Analysis Mean Other Economic Valuation Methods Are Not Needed?, Royal Swedish Academy of Science, pp. 628-643.
  14. Shin, C. O. and Yoog, G. H.(2011), Environmental and Economic Impact of Offshore Wind Power, Korea Maritime Institute, Repot 2011-05, pp. 35-49.
  15. The Scottish Government(2011), Economic Assessment of Short Term Options for Offshore Wind Energy in Scottish Territorial Waters : Cost and Benefits to Other Marine Users and Interests, Marine Scotland, pp. 84-88.
  16. Yoo, J. W., Hong, H. P., Hwang, J. Y., Lee, M. S., Lee, Y. W., Lee, C. S. and Hwang, S. D.(2014), A Study on the Ecological Indices for the Assessment of the Function and Maturity of Artificial Reefs, Journal of Korean Society of Oceanography, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 8-34.
  17. Yun, H. Y.(2017), A Study on US Natural Resource Damage Laws : Focusing on CERCLA and OPA, Journal of Law, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 197-229.
  18. Yu, O. K., Lee, H. G., Lee, J. H. and Kim, D. S.(2006), Impact of Sand Mining on the Macrobenthic Community in Gyeonggi Bay, Korea, Ocean and Polar Research, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 129-144. https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2006.28.2.129