Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety (해양환경안전학회지)

The Korean Society of Marine Environment and safety (해양환경안전학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) of Cyber Security Management: Focused on ECDIS User Experience

  • Received : 2021.05.06
  • Accepted : 2021.05.28
  • Published : 2021.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The mandatory installation of the ECDIS (Electronic Chart Display and Information System) became an important navigational equipment for navigation officer. In addition, ECDIS is a key component of the ship's digitalization in conjunction with various navigational equipment. Meanwhile, cyber-attacks emerge as a new threat along with digitalization. Damage caused by cyber-attacks is also reported in the shipping sector, and IMO recommends that cybersecurity guidelines be developed and included in International Security Management (ISM). This study analyzed the cybersecurity hazards of ECDIS, where various navigational equipment are connected. To this end, Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) was conducted on navigation officer using ECDIS. As a result, the development of technologies for cyber-attack detection and prevention should be priority. In addition, policies related to 'Hardware and Software upgrade', 'network access control', and 'data backup and recovery' were analyzed as contents to be maintained. This paper is significant in deriving risk factors from the perspective of ECDIS users and analyzing their priorities, and it is necessary to analyze various cyber-attacks that may occur on ships in the future.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the 'Development of Autonomous Ship Technology (20200615)' funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (MOF, Korea).

References

  1. BIMCO(2018), The Guidelines on Cyber Security Onboard Ships, Ver. 3, pp. 10-11.
  2. Cronbach, L. J.(1951), Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  3. D'agostini, E. and S. H. Jo.(2019), Maritime Security Training: Evaluation of the Impact on Seafarers' Security Awareness and Security Performance, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 201-211. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2019.25.2.201
  4. Deng, W.(2007), Using a revised importance performance analysis approach: The case of Taiwanese hot springs tourism, Tourism Management, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 1274-1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.07.010
  5. IHO(2017), Information on IHO Standards related to ENC and ECDIS.Version 1.1. Monaco: IHO.
  6. IHO(2018), Current IHO ECDIS and ENC Standards. Monaco: IHO.
  7. IMO(2006), Resolution MSC.232(86), Adoption of the revised performance standard for Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS)
  8. IMO(2009a), Report of the Maritime Safety Committee on its Eighty-sixth Session, MSC 86/26, p. 13.
  9. IMO(2009b), Report of the Maritime Safety Committee on its Eighty-sixth Session, MSC 86/26/Add.1, Annex 1, pp. 3-4.
  10. IMO(2012), Operational use of electronic chart display and information systems (ECDIS) MODEL COURSE 1.27.
  11. IMO(2016), MSC 96th session, 11-20 May 2016, Cyber Security - interim guidelines approved.
  12. IMO(2017), Resolution MSC.428(98), Maritime Cyber Risk Management in Safety Management Systems.
  13. Jung, M., Y. S. Park, and S. Y. Kang(2015), Analysis of User Requirement for the Improvement of ECDIS to Enhance Navigational Safety and Work Efficiency, Journal Korean Navigation and Port research, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 141-147. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2015.39.3.141
  14. Kesseler, G. C.(2019), Cybersecurity in the Maritime Domain. USCG Proceedings of the Marine Safety & Security Council, 76(1). Retrieved from https://commons.erau.edu/publication/1318.
  15. KMI(2019), A Study on Strengthening Cybersecurity System in the Maritime Sector, Korea Maritiem Institute.
  16. Kwon, S. H., W. L. Jeong, and S. B. Moon(2021), A Relative Importance Evaluation of Bridge Navigational Equipment Using AHP, Journal Korean Navigation and Port research, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 9-15.
  17. Lee, B. K.(2018), Usability Test and Investigation of Improvements of the ECDIS, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 146-156. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2018.24.2.146
  18. Lee, E. S., Y. J. Ahn, and S. H. Park(2020), A Study on the Development of a Training Course for Ship Cyber Security Officers, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 830-837. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2020.26.7.830
  19. Lee, J. S., B. K. Lee, and I. S. Cho.(2019), Text Mining Analysis Technique on ECDIS Accident Report, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 405-412. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2019.25.4.405
  20. Lim, S. G., S. C. So, and C. S. Lee(2017), An Empirical Analysis of the Performance of Goverment 3.0 'Service Goverment' Using IPA Analysis, Korean Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 137-167. https://doi.org/10.24145/kjpa.55.2.5
  21. Martilla, J. A. and J. C. James(1977), Importance-Performance Analysis, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41, No.3, pp. 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
  22. OCIMF(2017), TMSA3 Fast Facts, p. 2.
  23. Svilicic, B. and B. David(2019), Raising Awareness on Cyber Security of ECDIS, TRANSNAV the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 231-236. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.13.01.24
  24. Svilicic, B., K. Junzo, C. Jasmin, and B. Johan(2018), Assessing ship cyber risk: a framework and case study of ECDIS security, WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, Vol. 18, pp. 509-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00183-x