DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seasonal changes in copepod biomass and production in Gamak Bay, Korea

  • Moon, Seong Yong (South Sea Fisheries Research Institute, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Oh, Hyun Ju (Ocean Climate and Ecology Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science)
  • 투고 : 2021.02.10
  • 심사 : 2021.04.05
  • 발행 : 2021.04.30

초록

To better understand the ecological functioning of the coastal ecosystem in Gamak Bay on the southern coast of Korea, seasonal changes in the density, biomass, and secondary production of the copepod community were investigated. Environmental measurements (temperature, salinity, and chlorophyll a) and copepod sampling were performed seasonally from January to December 2006. The mean density of copepods (excluding nauplii) varied from 949 to 5,999 ind · m-3; copepod density was at its highest from March to July. The copepod community comprised 32 taxa, including Calanoida, Cyclopoida, and Harpacticoida. The predominant species were Paracalanus parvus s. l., Acartia omorii, Eurytemora pacifica, Oithona similis, A. erythraea, Centropages abdominalis, Pseudodiaptomus marinus, and Calanus sinicus. There were significant spatial and seasonal variations in copepod total biomass, which ranged from 0.33 to 43.10 mg C m-3. Mean secondary production of the copepods in Gamak Bay, estimated as 2.05 ± 1.63 mg C m-3 d-1 using the Huntley and Lopez growth model, was over 2 times higher than the value given by application of the Hirst and Bunker model (1.09 ± 0.85 mg C m-3 d-1). The daily production rate to biomass (P/B) ratio varied between 0.08 and 0.86 d-1 (Huntley and Lopez model), and 0.18 and 0.33 d-1 (Hirst and Bunker model). Our results emphasize the ecological significance of using models to estimate the secondary production of copepods and provides the first report of copepod production in Gamak Bay.

키워드

과제정보

We would like to thank Editage for English language editing.

참고문헌

  1. Ara K. Temporal variability and production of the planktonic copepod community in the Cananeia Lagoon estuarine system, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Zool Stud. 2004;43:179-86.
  2. Ara K, Hiromi J. Temporal variability in primary and copepod production in Sagami Bay, Japan. J Plankton Res. 2007;29:185-96.
  3. Chisholm LA, Roff JC. Abundances, growth rates, and production of tropical neritic copepods off Kingston, Jamaica. Mar Biol. 1990;106:79-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02114677
  4. David V, Sautour B, Galois R, Chardy P. The paradox high zooplankton biomass-low vegetal particulate organic matter in high turbidity zones: what way for energy transfer? J Plankton Res. 2006;333:202-18.
  5. Dias CO, Araujo AV, Vianna SC, Loureiro Fernandes LF, Paranhos R, Suzuki MS, et al. Spatial and temporal changes in biomass, production and assemblage structure of mesozooplanktonic copepods in the tropical south-west Atlantic Ocean. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2015;95:483-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315414001866
  6. Goncalves DA, Marques SC, Primo AL, Martinho F, Bordalo MBD, Pardal MA. Mesozooplankton biomass and copepod estimated production in a temperate estuary (Mondego estuary): effects of processes operating at different timescales. Zool Stud. 2015;54:57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40555-015-0135-6
  7. Han DH, Hong SY, Ma CW. Distribution of zooplankton in Deukryang Bay. J Korean Fish Soc. 1995;28:517-32.
  8. Hirota R. Dry weight and chemical composition of the important zooplankton in the Setonaikai (Inland Sea of Japan). Bull Plankton Soc Japan. 1981;28:19-24.
  9. Hirst AG, Bunker AJ. Growth of marine planktonic copepods: global rates and patterns in relation to chlorophyll a, temperature, and body weight. Limnol Oceanogr. 2003;48:1988-2010. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.1988
  10. Hirst AG, Lampitt RS. Towards a global model of in situ weight-specific growth in marine planktonic copepods. Mar Biol. 1998;132:247-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270050390
  11. Hirst AG, Sheader M. Are in situ weight-specific growth rates body-size independent in marine planktonic copepods? A re-analysis of the global syntheses and a new empirical model. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1997;154:155-65. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps154155
  12. Huntley M, Boyd C. Food-limited growth of marine zooplankton. Am Nat. 1984;124:455-78. https://doi.org/10.1086/284288
  13. Huntley ME, Lopez MDG. Temperature-dependent production of marine copepods: a global synthesis. Am Nat. 1992;140:201-42. https://doi.org/10.1086/285410
  14. Ikeda T, Motoda S. Estimated zooplankton production and their ammonia excretion in the Kuroshio an adjacent seas. Fish Bull. 1978;76:357-66.
  15. Islam MS, Ueda H, Tanaka M. Spatial and seasonal variations in copepod communities related to turbidity maximum along the Chikugo estuarine gradient in the upper Ariake Bay, Japan. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2006;68:113-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.02.002
  16. Kayfetz K, Kimmerer W. Abiotic and biotic controls on the copepod Pseudodiaptomus forbesi in the upper San Francisco Estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2017;581:85-101. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12294
  17. Kim JB, Lee SY, Yu J, Choi YH, Jung CS, Lee PY. The characteristics of oxygen deficient water mass in Gamak Bay. J Korean Soc Mar Environ Eng. 2006;9:216-24.
  18. Kimmerer WJ, Mckinnon AD. Growth, mortality, and secondary production of the copepod Acartia tranteri in Western Port Bay, Australia. Limnol Oceanogr. 1987;32:14-28. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1987.32.1.0014
  19. Kiorboe T. Population regulation and role of mesozooplankton in shaping marine pelagic food webs. Hydrobiologia. 1997;363:13-27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003173721751
  20. Kleppel GS, Davis CS, Carter K. Temperature and copepod growth in the sea: a comment on the temperature-dependent model of Huntley and Lopez. Am Nat. 1996;148:397-406. https://doi.org/10.1086/285932
  21. Leandro SM, Morgado F, Pereira F, Queiroga H. Temporal changes of abundance, biomass and production of copepod community in a shallow temperate estuary (Ria de Aveiro, Portugal). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2007;74:215-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.04.009
  22. Lee MO, Kim JK. Characteristics of algal blooms in the southern coastal waters of Korea. Mar Environ Res. 2008;65:128-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2007.09.006
  23. Lee YS, Moon SY. The water quality in the Soho coastal seawaters of Gamak Bay before and after a typhoon. Sea. 2006;11:117-23.
  24. Liang D, Uye S. Population dynamics and production of the planktonic copepods in a eutrophic inlet of the Inland Sea of Japan, II. Acartia omorii. Mar Biol. 1996a;125:109-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350765
  25. Liang D, Uye S. Population dynamics and production of the planktonic copepods in a eutrophic inlet of the Inland Sea of Japan, III. Paracalanus sp. Mar Biol. 1996b;127:219-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00942106
  26. Lin D, Li XQ, Fang HD, Dong YH, Huang ZX, Chen JH. Calanoid copepods assemblages in Pearl River Estuary of China in summer: relationships between species distribution and environmental variables. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2011;93:259-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2011.03.008
  27. Lopez MDG. Molting and mortality depend on age and stage in naupliar Calanus pacificus: implication for development time of field cohorts. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1991;75:79-89. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps075079
  28. Lugomela C, Wallberg P, Nielsen TG. Plankton composition and cycling of carbon during the rainy season in a tropical coastal ecosystem, Zanzibar, Tanzania. J Plankton Res. 2001;23:1121-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/23.10.1121
  29. Mauchline J. The biology of calanoid copepods. London, UK: Academic Press; 1998.
  30. Miyashita LK, de Melo M Jr, Lopes RM. Estuarine and oceanic influences on copepod abundance and production of a subtropical coastal area. J Plankton Res. 2009;31:815-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbp039
  31. Moon SY, Kim HY, Oh HJ. Seasonal variation of the zooplankton community of Gamak Bay, Korea. Korean J Environ Biol. 2020;38:231-47. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2020.38.2.231
  32. Moon SY, Soh HY, Choi SD, Jung CS, Kim SY, Lee YS. Effect a low-oxygen layer on the vertical distribution of zooplankton in Gamak Bay. Korean J Environ Biol. 2006a;24:240-7.
  33. Moon SY, Yoon HS, Soh HY, Choi SD. Environmental factors and variation characteristics of zooplankton communities in Gamak Bay. Ocean Polar Res. 2006b;28:79-94. https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2006.28.2.079
  34. Nielsen TG, Sabatini M. Role of cyclopoid copepods Oithona spp. in North Sea plankton communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1996;139:79-93. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps139079
  35. Parsons TR, Maita Y, Lalli CM. A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1984.
  36. Peterson WT, Tiselius P, Kiorboe T. Copepod egg production, moulting and growth rates, and secondary production, in the Skagerrak in August 1988. J Plankton Res. 1991;13:131-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/13.1.131
  37. Raymont JEG. Plankton and productivity in the ocean. In: John EG. editor. Zooplankton. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1983. p. 824.
  38. Soh HY, Choi SD. Species composition and occurrence patterns of zooplankton in Jinhae Bay. Korean J Environ Biol. 2004;22:43-56.
  39. Soh HY, Lee IT, Yoon YH, Choi SD, Lee SN, Han MI, et al. Species composition and occurrence patterns of zooplankton in Gamag Bay. Korean J Environ Biol. 2002;20:118-29.
  40. Soh HY, Suh HL. Seasonal fluctuation of the abundance of the planktonic copepods in Kwangyang Bay. Korean J Environ Biol. 1993;11:26-34.
  41. Turner JT. The importance of small planktonic copepods and their roles in pelagic marine food webs. Zool Stud. 2004;43:255-66.
  42. UNESCO. Zooplankton sampling: Monograph on oceanographic methodology. Paris, France: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation; 1968. p. 174.
  43. Uye SI. Length-weight relationships of important zooplankton from the Inland Sea of Japan. J Oceanogr Soc Japan. 1982;38:149-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110286
  44. Uye SI, Kuwata H, Endo T. Standing stocks and production rates of phytoplankton and planktonic copepods in the Inland Sea of Japan. J Oceanogr Soc Japan. 1986;42:421-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110193
  45. Uye SI, Liang D. Copepods attain high abundance, biomass and production in the absence of large predators but suffer cannibalistic loss. J Mar Syst. 1998;15:495-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(97)00052-3
  46. Uye SI, Nagano N, Shimazu T. Abundance, biomass, production and trophic roles of micro- and net-zooplankton in Ise Bay, central Japan, in Winter. J Oceanogr. 2000;56:389-98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011172221257
  47. Uye SI, Shimazu T. Geographical and seasonal variations in abundance, biomass and estimated production rates of meso- and macrozooplankton in the Inland Sea of Japan. J Oceanogr. 1997;53:529-38.