Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Learning Effects According to the Level of Science State Curiosity and Science State Anxiety Evoked in Science Learning

과학 학습에서 유발되는 과학상태호기심 및 과학상태불안 수준에 따른 학습효과

  • Received : 2021.03.04
  • Accepted : 2021.06.17
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the learning effects according to the level of Science State Curiosity (SSC) and Science State Anxiety (SSA) in science learning situation for 5th~6th grade elementary school students. To achieve this purpose, we measured and analyzed SSC and SSA in each learning situation by dividing science learning into three situations: Confronting scientific task (I), Checking the results (II), and Learning science concepts (III). In order to identify the net effects of SSC and SSA on learning effects, science curiosity, need for cognition, science self-concept, science anxiety, and interest, which were expected to affect the learning effects, were controlled. SSC and SSA in the situation of confronting scientific tasks were defined as 'SSCI' and 'SSAI,' SSC and SSA in the situation of checking the results were defined as 'SSCII' and 'SSAII,' and SSC and SSA in the situation of learning science concepts were defined as 'SSCIII' and 'SSAIII.' In addition, the learning effects were divided into post-learning effect and delayed post-learning effect, and the degree of improvements in the post- or delayed post-test scores compared to the pre-test score were calculated and analyzed. As a result of the analysis, SSCI·SSCII had a positive effect on the post- and the delayed post-learning effect, but SSAIII had a negative effect on the post- and delayed post-learning effect, SSAI·SSAII had a negative effect on the post-learning effect. SSC had a greater effect on learning effects than SSA, and SSCII had the most influence on the post-learning effect and SSCI had the most influence on the delayed post-learning effect. As SSCIII increased, there was a tendency to do additional voluntary learning. The results of this study are expected to broaden the understanding of students' emotional states in science learning and provide a theoretical foundation for studies of state curiosity and state anxiety.

본 연구는 초등학교 5~6 학년 학생을 대상으로 과학 학습 상황에서 과학상태호기심(Science State Curiosity; SSC) 및 과학상태불안(Science State Anxeity; SSA) 수준에 따른 학습효과를 구명하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 과학 학습을 과학 문제 대면(I), 결과 확인(II), 과학 개념 학습(III)의 세 가지 상황으로 구분하여 각 학습 상황에서 SSC 및 SSA를 측정하여 분석하였다. SSC 및 SSA가 학습효과에 미치는 순 영향을 파악하기 위해 학습효과에 영향을 줄 것으로 예상되는 과학호기심, 인지욕구, 과학자아개념, 과학불안, 흥미를 통제하였다. 과학 문제 대면 상황에서의 SSC 및 SSA를 'SSCI' 및 'SSAI'으로, 결과 확인 상황에서의 SSC 및 SSA를 'SSCII' 및 'SSAII'로, 과학 개념 학습 상황에서의 SSC 및 SSA를 'SSCIII' 및 'SSAIII'로 정의하였다. 그리고 학습효과를 직후학습효과와 지연학습효과로 구분하여 사전검사 점수에 비하여 직후검사 또는 지연검사 점수가 향상된 정도를 산출하여 분석하였다. 분석결과, 직후학습효과는 SSCI·SSCII가 높을수록, SSAI·SSAII·SSAIII가 낮을수록 높았으며, 지연학습효과는 SSCI·SSCII가 높을수록, SSAIII가 낮을수록 높았다. SSC가 SSA보다 학습효과에 미치는 영향이 컸으며, 직후학습효과에는 SSCII가, 지연학습효과에는 SSCI이 가장 많은 영향을 미쳤다. 또한 SSCIII가 높을수록 추가적인 자발적 학습을 하는 경향이 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 과학 학습에서 학생의 정서적 상태에 대한 이해의 폭을 넓히고, 상태호기심 및 상태불안 연구에 대한 이론적 토대를 마련할 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 과학기술정보통신부 및 정보통신기획평가원의 대학ICT연구센터지원사업의 연구결과로 수행되었음(IIITP-2021-2020-0-01606)

References

  1. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545-561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545
  2. Anderson, L. W. (1981). Assessing affective characteristics in the schools. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  3. Anderson, L. W., & Bourke, S. F. (2000). Assessing affective characteristics in the schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294170
  5. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.411
  6. Arnone, M. P., Grabowski, B. L., & Rynd, C. P. (1994). Curiosity as a personality variable influencing learning in a learner controlled lesson with and without advisement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298167
  7. Bae, B. R. (2017). Structural Equation Modeling with Amos 24, Seoul: Chungram.
  8. Bathgate, M. E., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. (2014). Children's motivation toward science across contexts, manner of interaction, and topic. Science Education, 98(2), 189-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21095
  9. Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology. 45(3), 180-191.
  10. Bertrams, A., & Dickhauser, O. (2009). High-school students' need for cognition, self-control capacity, and school achievement: Testing a mediation hypothesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.06.005
  11. Betebenner, D. W. (2011a). A Primer on Student Growth Percentiles. The Center for Assessment.
  12. Betebenner, D. W. (2011b). A technical overview of the Student Growth Percentile Methodology: Student Growth Percentiles and Percentile Growth Projections/Trajectories. The National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Dover: NH.
  13. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  14. Borowske, K. (2005). Curiosity and Motivation-to-learn. Proceeding of the ACRL twelfth National Conference.
  15. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.129
  16. Boyle, G. J. (1979). Delimitation of state-trait curiosity in relation to state anxiety and learning task performance. Australian Journal of Education, 23(1), 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494417902300109
  17. Brown, D. E. (2014). Students' Conceptions as Dynamically Emergent Structures. Science & Education, 23(7), 1463-1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9655-9
  18. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  19. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1984). The need for cognition: Relationship to attitudinal processes. In R. P. McGlynn, J. E. Maddux, C. D. Stoltenberg, & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Interfaces in psychology: Social perception in clinical and counseling psychology (Volume 2, pp. 113-139). Lubbock, Texas: Texas Tech University.
  20. Cattell, R. B., & Scheier, I. H. (1963). Handbook for the IPAT Anxiety Scale (2nd ed). Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
  21. Cho, Y., Kim. Y., & Kwon, J. (2004). Characteristics of Explanatory Hypothesis Formation by Anxiety Types in High School Students' Cognitive Conflict about Action-Reaction Task (I). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(3), 596-611.
  22. Choe, H. S., Kim, E. K., Lee, K. J., Chung, W. H., & Paik, S. H. (2001). Investigating Elementary Students' Alternative Conceptions of Heat and Temperature. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 20(1), 123-138.
  23. Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Czerniak, C., & Chiarelott, L. (1984). Science anxiety: An investigation of science achievement, sex and grade level factors. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED243672).
  25. Davidson, R. J. (1994). On emotion, mood, and related affective constructs. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 51-55). New York: Oxford University Press.
  26. Day, H. I. (1982). Curiosity and the interested explorer. Performance and Instruction, 21(4), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4170210410
  27. Deacy, A. D., Gayes, L. A., De Lurgio, S., & Wallace, D. P. (2016). Adaptation of the State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety for Use in Children: A Preliminary Analysis. Journal or Pediatric Psychology, 41(9), 1033-1043. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsw030
  28. Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2010). Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms. Pearson.
  29. Elias, S. M. & Loomis, R. J. (2002). Utilizing Need for Cognition and Perceived Self-Efficacy to Predict Academic Performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(8), 1687-1702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02770.x
  30. Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children's conceptions of heat and temperature. Science Education, 63(2), 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730630210
  31. Everson, H. T., Smodlaka, I., & Tobias, S. (1994). Exploring the relationship of test anxiety and metacognition on reading test performance: A cognitive analysis. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 7(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615809408248395
  32. Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Hobe, UK: Erlbaum.
  33. Fastrich, G. M., Kerr, T., Castel, A. D., & Murayama, K. (2018). The role of interest in memory for trivia questions: An investigation with a large-scale database. Motivation Science, 4(3), 227-250. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000087
  34. Grossnickle, E. M. (2016). Disentangling Curiosity: Dimensionality, Definitions, and Distinctions from Interest in Educational Contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 23-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9294-y
  35. Gruber, M. J., Gelman, B. D., & Ranganath, C. (2014). State of Curiosity Modulate Hippocampus-Dependent Learning via the Dopaminergic Circuit. Neuron, 84(2), 486-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.060
  36. Guay, F., Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (2004). Academic self-concept and educational attainment level: A ten-year longitudinal study. Self and Identity, 3(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500342000040
  37. Guthrie, J. T. (1981). Reading interests. The Reading Teacher, 34(8), 984-986.
  38. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  39. Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 47-77. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001047
  40. Hong, J., Hwang, M., Tai, K., & Tsai, C. (2017). An Exploration of Students' Science Learning Interest Related to Their Cognitive Anxiety, Cognitive Load, Self-Confidence and Learning Progress Using Inquiry-Based Learning With an iPad. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1193-1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9541-y
  41. Hong S, Malik, M. L., & Lee, M. K. (2003). Testing Configural, Metric, Scalar, and Latent Mean Invariance Across Genders in Sociotropy and Autonomy Using a Non-Western Sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(4), 636-654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403251332
  42. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  43. Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Learning to feel like a scientist. Science Education, 100(2), 189-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21202
  44. Jegede, O. J. (1987). Socio-cultural correlates of anxiety in science classrooms: a preliminary report. Paper presented as a contribution to the International Roundtable Exchange at the National Convention of the National Science Teachers Association, Washington, D. C., March, 26-29.
  45. Jeon, K. N. (2019). The mediating effects of academic effort of gifted and general students on the relation of academic self-concept to academic achievement. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 29(1), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2019.29.1.83
  46. Lee, K. H., & Koh, J. Y. (2003). The Relationship between Self-Concept and Academic Achievement of School-Age Children. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 2(2), 29-47.
  47. Kang, H. S. (2001). The influence of sexes and scholastic self-conception of elementary school students, school careers of their fathers, and parents' ways of bringing up their children on scholastic achievements of students. Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 249-261.
  48. Kang, H., Kwack, J., Kim, Y., & Noh, T. (2007). Influences of Cognitive Conflict and Non-cognitive Variables Induced by Discrepant Event and Alternative Hypothesis on Conceptual Change. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 51(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2007.51.1.056
  49. Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T.-Y., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20(8), 963-973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.x
  50. Kang, M., Kim, M., Kim, M., Park, H., & Koo, J. (2009). Investigating the Relationships among Prior knowledge, Cognitive Load, Flow, and Achievement. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 13(2), 369-391. https://doi.org/10.24231/RICI.2009.13.2.369
  51. Kang, J. (2021). Characteristics and Learning Effects of Elementary School Students' State Curiosity and State Anxiety in Science Learning. Ph. D. thesis, Pusan National University.
  52. Kang, J., & Kim, J. (2020). Analysis of the Relationship between Familiarity, Feeling of Knowing, State Curiosity, and State Anxiety of Elementary School Students in the Thermal Task Contexts. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 39(3), 433-448. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2020.39.3.433
  53. Kang, J., & Kim, J. (2021a). Heat Conceptions of Elementary School Students and Correct Answer Rate According to Level of Familiarity and Task Contexts. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 71(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.71.38
  54. Kang, J., & Kim, J. (2021b). The Effects of Interest in Thermal Concepts and the Perceived Task Difficulty on Science State Curiosity. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 40(2), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2021.40.2.175
  55. Kang, J., Yoo, P., & Kim, J. (2020). The Development of Instruments for the Measuring Science State Curiosity and Anxiety in Science Learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(5), 485-502. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.5.485
  56. Kifer, E. (1975). Relationships between academic achievement and personality characteristics: A quasi-longitudinal study. American Educational Research Journal, 12(2), 191-210. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312012002191
  57. Kim, B. K. (1993). The Relationship between Students' Science Anxiety and Achievement. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 13(3), 341-358.
  58. Kim, J., Choi, H., & Kwon, J. S. (2002). Students' Levels of Cognitive Conflict by Provided Quantitative Demonstration and Qualitative Demonstration. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(1), 12-21.
  59. Kim, K. J. (1984). The Effect of Academic Achievement and Perceived Parental Attitudes on Self-concepts of Elementary and Secondary School Students. Ph. D. thesis, Chung Ang University.
  60. Kim, S. J. (1999). An Investigation of Elementary School Children's Conceptions about Heat and Temperature. Master's thesis, Busan National University of Education.
  61. Kim. Y., Cho, Y., & Kwon, J. (2005). Characteristics of Explanatory Hypothesis Formation by Anxiety Types in High School Students' Cognitive Conflict about Action-Reaction Task (II). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25(3), 400-410.
  62. Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Neter, J. (2004). Applied Linear Regression Models. 4th Edition, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Chicago.
  63. Kwon, J. S., Lee, G. H., & Kim, Y. S. (2003). The Necessary Condition and the Sufficient Condition of Cognitive Conflict for Conceptual Change. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(5), 574-591.
  64. Kwon, J. S., Lee, G. H, Park, H. G., Kim, J. K. (2000, April). The relationship between the characteristics of cognitive conflict and responses to anomalous situations when learning science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. New Orleans, LG.
  65. Kwon, M. (2008). Effects of Cognitive Conflicts before and after Confronting Anomalous Phenomena on Middle School Students' Conceptual Changes in Physics. Ph. D. thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  66. Kwon, M., Kim, J., Kim, J. B., & Kwon, J. (2009). Effects of Cognitive Conflicts before Confronting Anomalous Phenomena on Middle School Students' Conceptual Changes in Physics. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(8), 886-897.
  67. Kwon, S., & Kim, I. (2003). Characteristics of Elementary Students' Conception of Temperature with Heat Conception. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 22(1), 15-28.
  68. Laukenmann, M., Bleicher, M., Fuss, S., Glaser-Zikuda, M., Mayring, P., & Rhoneck, C. (2003). An investigation on the influence of emotions on learning in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 489-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210163233
  69. Lee G, Kwon, J., Park, S., Kim, J., Kwon, H., & Park, H. (2003). Development of an Instrument for the Measuring Cognitive Conflict in Secondary-Level Science Classes. Journal of research in science teaching, 40(6), 585-603. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10099
  70. Lee, J. C. (1992). Development of the science anxiety measurement scale and analysis of the tendency about the secondary school students' science anxiety. Ph. D. thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  71. Lee, M. R. (1993). A Study on Attitude Related to the Science and Science Anxiety of Elementary Students. Master's thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  72. Lee, S. H. (2004). The Effects of Prior Knowledge on Elementary School Students' Probabilistic Correlational Reasoning and Analysis of Reasoning Strategies Using Process Tracing Method. Ph. D. thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  73. Lee, S. K., & Kim, U. H. (1995). A Study on Introducing the Science of History to Correct Misconception. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 15(3), 275-283.
  74. Leherissey, B. L. (1971). The development of a measure of state epistemic curiosity (Tech. Memo No. 34). Tallahassee: Florida State University.
  75. Lester, D. (1968). The effect of fear and anxiety on exploration and curiosity: toward a theory of exploration. The journal of General Psychology, 79(1), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1968.9710458
  76. Lim, K. H., & Lim, Y. (2007). Educational psychology, Seoul: Hakjisa.
  77. Litman, J. A., Hutchins, T. L., & Russon, R. K. (2005). Epistemic curiosity, feeling of knowing, and exploratory behavior. Cognition and Emotion, 19(4), 559-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000427
  78. Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2003). Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_16
  79. Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: a review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75
  80. Mallow, J. V., & Greenburg, S. L. (1982). Science anxiety: Causes and remedies. Journal of College Science Teaching, 11(6), 356-358.
  81. Mallow, J. V., & Greenburg, S. L. (1983). Science anxiety and science learning. The Physics Teacher, 21(2), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2341214
  82. Markey, A., & Loewenstein, G. (2014). CURIOSITY. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. International Handbook of Emotions in Education (pp. 228-245). New York, NY: Routledge.
  83. Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1998). Top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal models: The direction of causality in multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 509-527. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.509
  84. McGillivray, S., Murayama, K., & Castel, A. D. (2015). Thirst for Knowledge: The Effects of Curiosity and Interest on Memory in Younger and Older Adults. Psychology and Aging, 30(4), 835-841. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039801
  85. Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_5
  86. Na, J. Y. (2014). The roles and features of everyday experience in elementary school students' understanding of thermal phenomena. Ph. D. thesis, Seoul National University.
  87. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1991). A comparison of training programs intended for different types of test-anxious students: Further support for an information-processing model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 134-139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.134
  88. Naveh-Benjamin, M., McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y.-g., & Holinger, D. P. (1981). Test anxiety: Deficits in information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(6), 816-824. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.73.6.816
  89. Naylor, F. D. (1981). A state-trait curiosity inventory. Australian Psychologist, 16(2), 172-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050068108255893
  90. Noh, T., Jeong, E., Kang, S., & Han, J. (2002). The Role of Anomalous Data in Concept Learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(3), 586-594.
  91. Noh, T., Lim, H., Kang, S., & Kim, S. (2001). The Relationships among Students' Cognitive/Affective Variables, Cognitive Conflict Induced by Anomalous Data, and Conceptual Change. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(4), 658-667.
  92. Oh, Y. (1996). The Relationships among Need for Cognition, Academic Life, and Leisure Life of Middle School Students. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 34(3), 161-181.
  93. Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., Acosta, A., Callejas, A., & Lupianez, J. (2010). Attention and Anxiety: Different Attentional Functioning Under State and Trait Anxiety. Psychological Science, 21(2), 298-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609359624
  94. Paik, S. H., Cho, B. K., & Go, Y. M. (2007). Korean 4- to 11-Year-Old Student Conceptions of Heat and Temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 284-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20174
  95. Paik, S. H., & Park, Y. J. (2002). Analysis of Concepts Related to Heat and Temperature in Elementary and Secondary School Science Textbooks. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(3), 478-489.
  96. Park, H. J. (2008a). Test of Group invariance for the structural model among motivation, self-concept and student achievement: Using PISA 2006 data. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 21(3), 43-67.
  97. Park, J. S. (2008b). The Emotional Effects of Interest-type and Deprivation-type of Epistemic Curiosity: The Perfect Mediating Role of Actual Self. Master's thesis, Korea University.
  98. Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013383
  99. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  100. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167
  101. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
  102. Randler, C., Hummel, E., Glaser-Zikuda, M., Vollmer, C., Bogner, F. X., & Mayring, P. (2011). Reliability and validation of a short scale to measure situational emotions in science education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 6(4), 359-370.
  103. Raykov, T. (1998). On the use of confirmatory factor analysis in personality research. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(2), 291-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00159-1
  104. Reio, T. G., Petrosko, J. M., Wiswell, A. K., & Thongsukmag, J. (2006). The measurement and conceptualization of curiosity. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167(2), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.167.2.117-135
  105. Rosenberg, E. L. (1998). Levels of analysis and the organization of affect. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 247-270. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.2.3.247
  106. Sadowski, C. J. & Gulgos, S. (1996). Elaborative processing mediates the relationship between need for cognition and academic performance. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915011
  107. Sahin, M., Caliskan, S., & Dilek, U. (2015). Development and Validation of the Physics Anxiety Rating Scale. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(2), 183-200.
  108. Sarason, I. G. (1980). Test anxiety: theory, reasearch, and application. Hillsdale, N. J. : Erlbaum.
  109. Scasserra, D. (2008). The influence of perceived task difficulty on task performance. Master's thesis, Rowan University.
  110. Schiefele, U. (1996). Topic interest, Text Representation, and Quality of Experience. Comtemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 3-18.
  111. Schiefele, U., & Krapp, A. (1996). Topic interest and free recall of expository text. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(2), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90030-8
  112. Schutz, P. A., & Lanehart, S. L. (2002). Introduction: Emotions in Education. Educational psychologist, 37(2), 67-68. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_1
  113. Schutz, P. A., & Pekrun, R. (2007). Emotion in Education. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
  114. Seong, T. (2019). An Easy Statistical Analysis: From Descriptive Statistics To Structural Equation Model. (3rd ed.), Seoul: Hakjisa.
  115. Sewasew, D., & Schroeders, U. (2019). The developmental interplay of academic self-concept and achievement within and across domains among primary school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.009
  116. Shim, W. Y. (1990). Cognitive approaches to test anxiety. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 4(1), 171-185.
  117. Shim, Y. I., & Kim, H. N. (2013). The Relationship between Cognitive, Affective Academic Achievement and Self-concept in Elementary School Science. The Journal of Korea elementary education, 24(1), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.24.1.201303.43
  118. Shin, H. S., & Kim, J. (2017). Estimating Student Growth and Exploring Correlates of Student Growth Using Student Growth Percentile. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 20(2), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2017.20.2.113
  119. Shin, M. L. (1999). Middle School Students' Conceptions on Heat Transfer. Master's thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  120. Shin, Y., Kang, H., Kwak, Y. Kim, H., Lee, S. Y., & Lee, S. (2017). A Comparative Analysis of the Test Tools in Science-related Affective Domains. Biology Education, 45(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.1.41
  121. Song, Y. H. (2012). The Relationships among Achievement Goal, Self-efficacy, Anxiety, and Learning Outcomes in Calculus. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 16(4), 1001-1020. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2012.16.4.1001
  122. Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
  123. Spielberger, C. D., Barker, L., Russell, S., Silva de Crane, R., Westberry, L., Knight, J., & Marks, E. (1979). Preliminary manual for the State-Trait Personality Inventory(STPI). Tampa: University of South Florida.
  124. Sung, Y., Kim, H., Lee, H., Park, J, Kim, H., & Kim, B. (2008). The Psychological Mechanism of Epistemic Curiosity: a comparative study of two curiosity gratification types. Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 9(2), 305-331. https://doi.org/10.21074/KJLCAP.2008.9.2.305
  125. Sung, Y., Lee, H., Park, H. & Bang J. (2009). The influence of the time-delay of curiosity gratification on reward and learning effects: Focusing on the moderating effects of degrees of curiosity. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 20(4), 43-58.
  126. Tobias, S. (1977). A model for research on the effect of anxiety on instruction. In J. E. Sieber, H. F. O'Neil, Jr., & S. Tobias, Anxiety, learning and instruction (pp.223-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Inc.
  127. Tobias, S. (1979). Anxiety research in educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(5), 573-582. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.71.5.573
  128. Tobias, S. (1980). Anxiety and instruction. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.), Test anxiety: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 289-310). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  129. Tobias, S. (1985). Test anxiety: Interference, defective skills, and cognitive capacity. Educational Psychologist, 20(3), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2003_3
  130. Tobin, K., Ritchie, S., Oakley, J., Mergard, V., & Hudson, P. (2013). Relationships between emotional climate and the fluency of classroom interactions. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9125-y
  131. Trudewind, C. (2000). Curiosity and anxiety as motivational determinants of cognitive development. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Advances in psychology, 131. Motivational psychology of human development: Developing motivation and motivating development (pp. 15-38). Elsevier Science.
  132. Weber, C. K. (1979). Cognitive and affective influences on text comprehension. Ph. D. thesis, New York University.
  133. Wine, J. D. (1980). Cognitive-attentional theory of test anxiety. In I. G. Sarason (Ed), Test anxiety: Theory, research and applications (pp. 349-385). L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
  134. Yu, J. P. (2015). The re-examination of conceptual model which contains control variables in structural equation modeling : Focusing on power, satisfaction and long-term orientation. Journal of channel and retailing, 20(3), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.17657/jcr.2015.07.31.3