DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Sustainable Laundry Behavior -Comparison between Korean and European Consumers-

국내 세탁행동의 지속가능성에 관한 연구 -유럽과의 비교를 중심으로-

  • Wee, Jeeweon (Dept. of Human Ecology & Interdisciplinary Program in Sustainable Living System, Korea University Graduate School) ;
  • Lee, Yoon-Jung (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea University) ;
  • Jung, Hye Jung (Da Vinci College of General Education, Chung-Ang University)
  • 위지원 (고려대학교 대학원 생활과학과.지속가능생활시스템융합전공) ;
  • 이윤정 (고려대학교 가정교육과) ;
  • 정혜정 (중앙대학교 다빈치교양대학)
  • Received : 2021.02.05
  • Accepted : 2021.04.14
  • Published : 2021.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the sustainability of laundry practices among Korean households in comparison with European households. A total of 329 responses were collected through an online survey and analyzed using SPSS. Detergent dosing, use of fabric softener, prewashing, rinsing, washing programs, and washing temperatures of Korean households were not optimal for sustainability. Only 11.2% of respondents followed dosage instructions while the majority based on load size. Use of fabric enhancer, prewashing, and rinsing were frequent. Cotton 40℃ was the most frequently used program (81.5%) while eco and cold wash programs were among the least (1.5%). In terms of laundry sorting, load size, drying, and ironing, more sustainable actions were reported. Laundry was often sorted by color, machines were commonly filled, and clothes tended to be air-dried and not excessively ironed. Gender was the primary socio-demographic factor denoting sustainable habits, with males being more attentive to instructions and care labels than females. European households, however, were more sustainable in all areas except for frequent ironing, and education level and employment status were significant factors affecting sustainable practices.

Keywords

References

  1. Agyeman, J. (2005). Sustainable communities and the challenge of environmental justice. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  2. A.I.S.E. (2013, November 1). Look! Your fabric conditioner is more concentrated. Follow the dosage instructions, help the environment! [PDF document]. A.I.S.E. Retrieved from https://aise.eu/documents/document/20131101185656-final_fabcon_patchwork_light.pdf
  3. Alborzi, F., Schmitz, A., & Stamminger, R. (2017). Effects of sociodemographic factors on laundry behaviors in Europe and their implications on sustainability. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(6), 671-684. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12380
  4. Allwood, J. M., Laursen, S. E., de Rodriguez, C. M., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2006). Well dressed?: The present and future sustain ability of clothing and textiles in the United Kingdom. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing.
  5. Arild, A.-H. (Ed.), Brusdal, R., Halvorsen Gunnarsen, J. T., Terpstra, P. M. J., & van Kessel, I. A. C. (2003). An investigation of domestic laundry in Europe - Habits, hygiene and technical performance. Oslo: National Institute for Consumer Research.
  6. Bae, J. S., Cho, E. Y., & Park, E. H. (2001). Behavior on clothes care of female consumers by lifestyle groups. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 39(6), 1-14
  7. Bae, S. W., & Lee, M. S. (1994). A study on consumer's perception and attitude to care labels of textile products. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 18(4), 480-489.
  8. Bain, J., Beton, A., Schultze, A., Mudgal, S., Dowling, M., Hold way, R., & Owens, J. (2009, December). Sustainable clothing roadmap: Reducing the environmental impact of clothes cleaning. Defra Science Search. Retrieved from http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=16094
  9. Bartels, V. T. (Ed.). (2011). Handbook of medical textiles. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
  10. Bode, M., Pfeiffer, C., & Schrader, U. (2000). Strategies towards the sustainable household in Germany findings of an EU-research project on clothing care and shelter. Hannover: Universitat Hannover.
  11. Cha, O.-S., & Lee, I.-S. (1994). The laundry habits and the residual soils of white cotton undershirts in repeating home laundry. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 18(4), 549-559.
  12. Choi, S.-H., & Kim, J.-S. (1997). Survey on the laundry behavior-The comparison of washing machine and laundry behavior-. Journal of The Korean Society of Living Environmental System, 4(3), 59-71.
  13. Fletcher, K. (2008). Sustainable fashion & textiles: Design journeys. London and Sterling: Earthscan.
  14. Franklin Associates, LTD. (1993, June). Resource and environmental profile analysis of a manufactured apparel product - Life cycle analysis (LCA): Woman's knit polyester blouse [PDF document]. Pollution Prevention Infohouse (Comprehensive reference collection). Retrieved from https://p2infohouse.org/ref/39/38369.htm
  15. Goynes, W. R., & Rollins, M. L. (1971). A scanning electron-microscope study of washer-dryer abrasion in cotton fibers. Textile Research Journal, 41(3), 226-231. doi:10.1177/004051757104100307
  16. Gwilt, A. (2014). A practical guide to sustainable fashion. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
  17. Hauthal, H. G. (2012). Washing at low temperatures - Savingenergy, ensuring hygiene. Tenside Surfactants Detergents, 49 (2), 171-177. doi:10.3139/113.110181
  18. IKW. (2009, May). Nachhaltigkeitsbericht: Wasch- und reinigungsmittelbranche in Deutschland berichtsjahre 2007 und 2008 [Washing and cleaning in Netherlands 2007 to 2008]. IKW, the German Cosmetic, Toiletry, Perfumery and Detergent Association. Retrieved from https://www.ikw.org/fileadmin/ikw/downloads/Haushaltspflege/HP_Nachhaltigkeitsbericht07-08.pdf
  19. Jack, T. (2013). Laundry routine and resource consumption in Australia. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(6), 666-674. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12048
  20. Jakobi, G., & Lohr, A. (1987). Detergents and textile washing: Principles and practice. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
  21. Kang, Y. S. (1995). Trends in laundry detergents in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 19(1), 161-169.
  22. Kim, B.-M. (1984). An investigation study on the awareness and attitude of homemakers to detergent. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 22(4), 121-129.
  23. Kim, J., Yun, C., Park, Y., & Park, C. H. (2015). Post-consumer energy consumption of textile products during 'use' phase of the lifecycle. Fibers and Polymers, 16(4), 926-933. doi:10.1007/s12221-015-0926-8
  24. Kim, S.-R., Lee, J. S., Chung, H., Kang, I.-S., & Park, C. H. (2008). 새의류관리 - 구매에서 폐기까지 [New clothing care - From purchase to disposal]. Paju: Kyomunsa.
  25. Kim, T.-m. (2015). Study on the laundry behavior according to the number of household and the type of washer. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 23(6), 1082-1096. doi:10.7741/rjcc.2015.23.6.1082
  26. Kim, Y., & Shin, S. O. (1998). A study on the housewives' clothing behavior for the environmental protection. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 39, 271-281.
  27. Ko, S. Y., Kim, C. H., Park, J. H., Lee, H. J., Lee, J. H., & Lee, K.-H. (2007). Laundering and care of knitwear products. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 31(9/10), 1364-1372. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.9_10.1364
  28. Kruschwitz, A., Karle, A., Schmitz, A., & Stamminger, R. (2014). Consumer laundry practices in Germany. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(3), 265-277. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12091
  29. Laitala, K., Boks, C., & Klepp, I. G. (2011). Potential for environmental improvements in laundering. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(2), 254-264. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00968.x
  30. Lee, H.-S., Lee, J., Kim, S.-G., Kim, M., & Lee, H. (2004). A study on the laundry behavior of university students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 16(3), 147-161.
  31. Lee, J. W., & Choi, D. S. (1983). A study of the laundering management in the urban household. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 21(3), 87-96.
  32. Miilunpalo, S.-M., & Raisanen, R. (2019). Clean laundry with pure conscience-A study on laundry practices among Finnish consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 43(2), 153-165. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12493
  33. Nam, S.-W. (1988). A study on the awareness of detergents and washing method. 중앙대학교 가정문화논총, 2, 107-120.
  34. Oh, K., & Yu, H. (1997). Evaluation of washing efficiency based on consumer's washing behavior-Integral approach for improving washing machines(II)-. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 21(2), 251-261.
  35. Park, C.-A. (1989). 시판 의류제품의 품질표시 실태와 소비자 태도에 관한 연구 [A study on the current practices and consumers' attitude toward quality labels of apparel products in the market] (Unpublished master's thesis). Hanyang University, Seoul.
  36. Park, H.-S., & Suh, Y.-S. (1998). Environmental perception of consumers and clothing consumption behavior. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 36(10), 79-88.
  37. Ryu, D. H., & Lee, B. Y. (1999). The study of relationship among housewive's backgrounds, laundry practice, laundry concept and interests about environmental pollution. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 8(1), 109-124.
  38. Schmitz, A., & Stamminger, R. (2014). Usage behaviour and related energy consumption of European consumers for washing and drying. Energy Efficiency, 7(6), 937-954. doi:10.1007/s12053-014-9268-4
  39. Seong, H. Y., & Lee, J. S. (2010). The effect of washing machine type on the behavior of clothing management and consumer satisfaction. Journal of the Korean Society for Clothing Industry, 12(3), 389-397. doi:10.5805/KSCI.2010.12.3.389
  40. Shin, I.-S., & Yu, B.-S. (2004). A study on the attitude in recognition of environmental pollution and safety of laundry detergents - centering around Jeonju . Gunsan -. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 28(2), 189-199.
  41. Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness + convenience: The social organization of normality. Oxford and New York: Berg.
  42. Stahel, W. R. (1993). Re-use and recycling: Waste prevention and resource savings in utilization. Ekistics, 60(358-359), 14-18.
  43. Throne-Holst, H., Strandbakken, P., & Sto, E. (2008) Identification of households' barriers to energy saving solutions. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 19(1), 54-66. doi:10.1108/14777830810840363
  44. Uitdenbogerd, D. E. (2007). Energy and households: The acceptance of energy reduction options in relation to the performance and organization of household activities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wageningen University, Wageningen.
  45. Vezzoli, C. (1998, November). Clothing care in the sustainable household [PDF document]. Paper presented in 7th Greening of Industry Network Conference, Rome. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carlo_Vezzoli/publication/267702955_CLOTHING_CARE_IN_THE_SUSTAINABLE_HOUSEHOLD/links/564efbbb08aeafc2aab302cf.pdf
  46. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  47. WRAP. (2012, July 11). Valuing our clothes: The true cost of how we design, use and dispose of clothing in the UK (2012) [PDF document]. WRAP. Retrieved from https://wrap.org.uk/sites/default/files/2021-01/WRAP-valuing-our-clothes-2012-07-11.pdf
  48. Yamaguchi, Y., Seii, E., Itagaki, M., & Nagayama, M. (2011). Evaluation of domestic washing in Japan using life cycle assessment (LCA). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(2), 243-253. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00975.x
  49. Yun, C. (2018). 의류제품의 사용과정과 지속가능성: 1인가구를 중심으로 [Use phase of textile products and its sustainability: Analysis focused on single households]. Proceedings of the Korean Home Management Association, Spring Conference, Korea, 96.
  50. Yun, C., Patwary, S., LeHew, M. L. A., & Kim, J. (2017). Sustainable care of textile products and its environmental impact: Tumble-drying and ironing processes. Fibers and Polymers, 18 (3), 590-596. doi:10.1007/s12221-017-6957-6
  51. Yun, C., Ryu, H., & Park, S. (2018). Sustainability of textile products based on washing conditions: Focusing on the washing temperature and washing time. Family and Environment Research, 56(5), 417-424. doi:10.6115/fer.2018.030