Wind and Structures

  • 제33권1호
  • /
  • Pages.71-86
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1226-6116(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6225(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Aerodynamic modeling for streamlined box girders using nonlinear differential equations and validation in actively generated turbulence

  • Zhao, Lin (State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Liu, Shengyuan (State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Yan, Junfeng (China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Ge, Yaojun (State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.31
  • 심사 : 2021.07.14
  • 발행 : 2021.07.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In classical buffeting analysis theory, aerodynamic forces are usually expressed by a linear quasi-steady formula, and they are improved by aerodynamic admittances suitable for streamlined bridge girders. Recent studies have shown that admittances change obviously with incoming flow characteristics and aerodynamic nonlinearity, such as the frequency multiplication phenomenon, and motion-induced amplitude-related aerodynamic effects cannot be ignored in some cases. To address these problems, a nonlinear condensed subsystem equation (NCSE) suitable for wind-induced aerodynamic force modeling is established in the time domain. It characterizes aerodynamic nonlinearity with series of nonlinear differential equations and data-driven parameters. The proposed framework can be used for complex aerodynamic re-illustration related to the strong nonlinearity of streamlined box girders. To validate the precision and feasibility of the framework, sectional model experiments performed on a streamlined box girder were carried out in an active turbulence generated wind tunnel in which an adjustable array of multiple fans was assisted by actively controlled vibrating wings for a 2D turbulence condition. The case study shows that the NCSE model can be used to predict nonlinear aerodynamic forces in the time and frequency domains, even under complex stochastic flow conditions. The proposed method provides an alternative way to predict possible aerodynamics based on the condition of incoming flow with sufficient accuracy, and it can illustrate multifrequency components of aerodynamic forces.

키워드

과제정보

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078383, 52008314) and Independent Subject of State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering (SLDRCE19-B-11). The authors also appreciate the heartily help from Prof. S. Ozono and Assistant Prof. H. Miyagi in Miyazaki University and Dr. A. Yoshida in Tokyo Polytechnic University for their kind guideline during wind tunnel tests.

참고문헌

  1. Arioli, G. and Gazzola, F. (2015), "A new mathematical explanation of what triggered the catastrophic torsional mode of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge", Appl. Math. Model., 39(2), 901-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.06.022.
  2. Barni, N., O iseth, O. and Mannini, C. (2021), "Time-variant selfexcited force model based on 2D rational function approximation", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 211, 104523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104523.
  3. Cao, S.Y., Nishi, A., Kikugawa, H. and Matsuda, Y. (2002), "Reproduction of wind velocity history in a multiple fan wind tunnel", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 90(12-15), 1719-1729. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00282-9.
  4. Chen, Z.Q., Han, Y., Hua, X.G. and Luo, Y.Z. (2009), "Investigation on influence factors of buffeting response of bridges and its aeroelastic model verification for Xiaoguan Bridge", Eng. Struct., 31(2), 417-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.08.016.
  5. Cheng, C.M., Peng, Z.K., Zhang, W.M. and Meng, G. (2017), "Volterra-series-based nonlinear system modeling and its engineering applications: A state-of-the-art review", Mech. Syst. Signal Proc., 87, 340-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.10.029.
  6. Cigada, A., Diana, G. and Zappa, E. (2002), "On the response of a bridge deck to turbulent wind: A new approach", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 90(10), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00230-1.
  7. Davenport, A.G. (1962), "Buffeting of a suspension bridge by storm winds", J. Struct. Div., 88(3), 233-270. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0000773
  8. Diana, G. and Omarini, S. (2020), "A non-linear method to compute the buffeting response of a bridge validation of the model through wind tunnel tests", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 201, 104163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104163.
  9. Diana, G., Resta, F. and Rocchi, D. (2008), "A new numerical approach to reproduce bridge aerodynamic non-linearities in time domain", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 96(10-11), 1871-1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.052.
  10. Diana, G., Rocchi, D. and Argentini, T. (2013), "An experimental validation of a band superposition model of the aerodynamic forces acting on multi-box deck sections", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 113, 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.12.005.
  11. Diana, G., Rocchi, D., Argentini, T. and Muggiasca, S. (2010), "Aerodynamic instability of a bridge deck section model: Linear and nonlinear approach to force modeling", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 98(6-7), 363-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.01.003.
  12. Fang, G.S., Cao, J.X., Yang, Y.X., Zhao, L., Cao, S.Y. and Ge, Y.J. (2020a), "Experimental uncertainty quantification of flutter derivatives for a PK section girder and its application on probabilistic flutter analysis", J. Bridge Eng., 25(7), 04020034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001567.
  13. Fang, G.S., Pang, W.C., Zhao, L., Rawal, P., Cao, S.Y. and Ge, Y.J. (2021), "Toward a refined estimation of typhoon wind hazards: Parametric modeling and upstream terrain effects", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 209, 104460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104460.
  14. Fang, G.S., Zhao, L., Chen, X., Cao, J.X., Cao, S.Y. and Ge, Y.J. (2020b), "Normal and typhoon wind loadings on a large cooling tower: A comparative study", J. Fluids Struct., 95, 102938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.102938.
  15. Gao, G.Z., Zhu, L.D., Han, W.S. and Li, J.W. (2018), "Nonlinear post-flutter behavior and self-excited force model of a twinside-girder bridge deck", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 177, 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.12.007.
  16. Gao, G.Z., Zhu, L.D., Li, J.W., Han, W.S. and Yao, B. (2020), "A novel two-degree-of-freedom model of nonlinear self-excited force for coupled flutter instability of bridge decks", J. Sound Vibr., 480, 115406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115406.
  17. Larsen, A. (2000), "Aerodynamics of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge - 60 Years Later", Struct. Eng. Int., 10(4), 243-248. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686600780481356.
  18. Ling, S.C. (1972), "Decay of isotropic turbulence generated by a mechanically agitated grid", Phys. Fluids, 15(8), 1363-1369. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1694093.
  19. Liu, S.Y. and Ge, Y.J. (2013), "Fitting method of nonlinear differential equations for aerodynamic forces of bridge decks", Proceedings of the 12th Americas Conference on Wind Engineering, Seattle, USA, June.
  20. Ma, T.T., Zhao, L., Cao, S.Y., Ge, Y.J. and Miyagi, H. (2013), "Investigations of aerodynamic effects on streamlined box girder using two-dimensional actively-controlled oncoming flow", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 122, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.011.
  21. Macdonald, J.H.G. and Larose, G.L. (2006), "A unified approach to aerodynamic damping and drag/lift instabilities, and its application to dry inclined cable galloping", J. Fluids Struct., 22(2), 229-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.10.002.
  22. Matsumoto, M., Daito, Y., Yoshizumi, F., Ichikawa, Y. and Yabutani, T. (1997), "Torsional flutter of bluff bodies", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 69-71, 871-882. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00213-4.
  23. Nishi, A., Kikugawa, H., Matsuda, Y. and Tashiro, D. (1999), "Active control of turbulence for an atmospheric boundary layer model in a wind tunnel", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 83(1-3), 409-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00089-6.
  24. Noda, M., Utsunomiya, H., Nagao, F., Kanda, M. and Shiraishi, N. (2003), "Effects of oscillation amplitude on aerodynamic derivatives", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 91(1-2), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00338-0.
  25. Phillips, J.C., Thomas, N.H., Perkins, R.J. and Miller, P.C.H. (1999), "Wind tunnel velocity profiles generated by differentially-spaced flat plates", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 80(3), 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00207-4.
  26. Sarkar, P.P., Jones, N.P. and Scanlan, R.H. (1994), "Identification of aeroelastic parameters of flexible bridges", J. Eng. Mech., 120(8), 1718-1742. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:8(1718).
  27. Scanlan, R.H. and Jones, N.P. (1999), "A form of aerodynamic admittance for use in bridge aeroelastic analysis", J. Fluids Struct., 13, 1017-1027. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1999.0243.
  28. Scanlan, R.H. and Tomko, J.J. (1971), "Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives", J. Eng. Mech. Div., 97(6), 1717-1737. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0001526
  29. Talamelli, A., Riparbelli, L. and Westin, J. (2004), "An active grid for the simulation of atmospheric boundary layers in a wind tunnel", Wind Struct., 7(2), 131-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/was.2004.7.2.131.
  30. Tao, T.Y., Wang, H., Shi, P. and Li, H. (2020), "Stationary and non-stationary buffeting analyses of a long-span bridge under typhoon winds", Wind Struct., 31(5), 455-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/was.2020.31.5.445.
  31. Wu, T. and Kareem, A. (2011), "Modeling hysteretic nonlinear behavior of bridge aerodynamics via cellular automata nested neural network", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 99(4), 378-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.12.011.
  32. Wu, T. and Kareem, A. (2013a), "Aerodynamics and aeroelasticity of cable-supported bridges: Identification of nonlinear features", J. Eng. Mech., 139(12), 1886-1893. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000615.
  33. Wu, T. and Kareem, A. (2013b), "Vortex-induced vibration of bridge decks: Volterra series-based model", J. Eng. Mech., 139(12), 1831-1843. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000628.
  34. Xu, K., Zhao, L. and Ge, Y.J. (2017), "Reduced-order modeling and calculation of vortex-induced vibration for large-span bridges", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 167, 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.04.016.
  35. Zhang, M.J., Wu, T. and Xu, F.Y. (2019), "Vortex-induced vibration of bridge decks: Describing function-based model", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 195, 104016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104016.
  36. Zhang, Z.T., Zhang, X.X., Yang, Y.X. and Ge, Y.J. (2017), "Nonlinear aerodynamic and energy input properties of a twinbox girder bridge deck section", J. Fluids Struct., 74, 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.06.016.
  37. Zhao, L., Xie, X., Wu, T., Li, S.P., Li, Z.P., Ge, Y.J. and Kareem, A. (2020a), "Revisiting aerodynamic admittance functions of bridge decks", J. Zhejiang Univ.-SCI A, 21(7), 535-552. http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1900353.
  38. Zhao, L., Xie, X., Zhan, Y.Y., Cui, W., Ge, Y.J., Xia, Z.C., Xu, S.Q. and Zeng, M. (2020b), "A novel forced motion apparatus with potential applications in structural engineering", J. Zhejiang Univ.-SCI A, 21(7), 593-608. http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1900400.
  39. Zhu, L.D., Meng, X.L. and Guo, Z.S. (2013), "Nonlinear mathematical model of vortex-induced vertical force on a flat closed-box bridge deck", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 122, 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.008.
  40. Zhu, L.D., Meng, X.L., Du, L.Q. and Ding, M.C. (2017), "A simplified nonlinear model of vertical vortex-induced force on box decks for predicting stable amplitudes of vortex-induced vibrations", Eng, 3(6), 854-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.06.001.