Progress in Medical Physics (한국의학물리학회지:의학물리)

Korean Society of Medical Physics (한국의학물리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Feasibility of Improving the Accuracy of Dose Calculation Using Hybrid Computed Tomography Images: A Phantom Study

  • Jeon, Hosang (Department of Radiation Oncology and Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Dong Woon (Department of Radiation Oncology and Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital) ;
  • Joo, Ji Hyeon (Department of Radiation Oncology and Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital) ;
  • Ki, Yongkan (Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Wontaek (Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Dahl (Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Nam, Jiho (Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Dong Hyeon (Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University Hospital)
  • Received : 2020.12.30
  • Accepted : 2021.01.19
  • Published : 2021.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Kilovoltage computed tomography (kV-CT) is essential for radiation treatment planning. However, kV-CT images are significantly distorted by artifacts when a metallic prosthesis is present in the patient's body. Thus, the accuracies of target delineation and treatment dose calculation are inevitably lowered. We evaluated the accuracy of the calculated doses using an image restoration method with hybrid CT, which was introduced in our previous study. Methods: A cylindrical phantom containing four metals, namely, silver, copper, tin, and tungsten, was scanned using kV-CT and megavoltage CT to produce hybrid CT images. We created six verification plans for three head and neck patients on kV-CT and hybrid CT images of the phantom and calculated their doses. The actual doses were measured with film patches during beam delivery using tomotherapy. We used the gamma evaluation method to compare dose distribution between kV-CT and hybrid CT with three gamma criteria, namely, 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, and 1%/1 mm. Results: The gamma pass rates decreased as the gamma criteria were strengthened, and the pass rate of hybrid CT was higher than that of kV-CT in all cases. When the 1%/1 mm criterion was used, the difference in gamma pass rates between them was up to 13%p. Conclusions: According to our findings, we expect that the use of hybrid CT can be a suitable approach to avoid the effect of severe metal artifacts on the accuracy of dose calculation and contouring.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (2017R1D1A1B03031351), and by a 2020 research grant from Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital.

References

  1. Glover GH, Pelc NJ. An algorithm for the reduction of metal clip artifacts in CT reconstructions. Med Phys. 1981;8:799-807. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595032
  2. Yazdi M, Gingras L, Beaulieu L. An adaptive approach to metal artifact reduction in helical computed tomography for radiation therapy treatment planning: experimental and clinical studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:1224-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.052
  3. Zhao S, Robertson DD, Wang G, Whiting B, Bae KT. X-ray CT metal artifact reduction using wavelets: an application for imaging total hip prostheses. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000;19:1238-1247. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.897816
  4. Kalender WA, Hebel R, Ebersberger J. Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. Radiology. 1987;164:576-577. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.164.2.3602406
  5. Mahnken AH, Raupach R, Wildberger JE, Jung B, Heussen N, Flohr TG, et al. A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:769-775. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000086495.96457.54
  6. Yu H, Zeng K, Bharkhada DK, Wang G, Madsen MT, Saba O, et al. A segmentation-based method for metal artifact reduction. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:495-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2006.12.015
  7. Zhang Y, Zhang L, Zhu XR, Lee AK, Chambers M, Dong L. Reducing metal artifacts in cone-beam CT images by preprocessing projection data. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:924-932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.09.045
  8. Boas FE, Fleischmann D. Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography. Radiology. 2011;259:894-902. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11101782
  9. Mehranian A, Ay MR, Rahmim A, Zaidi H. X-ray CT metal artifact reduction using wavelet domain L0 sparse regularization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013;32:1707-1722. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2013.2265136
  10. Zhang X, Wang J, Xing L. Metal artifact reduction in x-ray computed tomography (CT) by constrained optimization. Med Phys. 2011;38:701-711. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3533711
  11. Stayman JW, Otake Y, Prince JL, Khanna AJ, Siewerdsen JH. Model-based tomographic reconstruction of objects containing known components. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012;31:1837-1848. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2012.2199763
  12. Ruchala KJ, Olivera GH, Schloesser EA, Mackie TR. Megavoltage CT on a tomotherapy system. Phys Med Biol. 1999;44:2597-2621. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/10/316
  13. Meeks SL, Harmon JF Jr, Langen KM, Willoughby TR, Wagner TH, Kupelian PA. Performance characterization of megavoltage computed tomography imaging on a helical tomotherapy unit. Med Phys. 2005;32:2673-2681. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1990289
  14. Jeon H, Park D, Youn H, Nam J, Lee J, Kim W, et al. Generation of hybrid sinograms for the recovery of kV-CT images with metal artifacts for helical tomotherapy. Med Phys. 2015;42:4654-4667. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4926552
  15. Ahnesjo A, Aspradakis MM. Dose calculations for external photon beams in radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 1999;44:R99-R155. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/11/201
  16. Ahnesjo A. Collapsed cone convolution of radiant energy for photon dose calculation in heterogeneous media. Med Phys. 1989;16:577-592. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596360
  17. Lu W, Olivera GH, Chen ML, Reckwerdt PJ, Mackie TR. Accurate convolution/superposition for multi-resolution dose calculation using cumulative tabulated kernels. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:655-680. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/4/007
  18. Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, Purdy JA. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys. 1998;25:656-661. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598248
  19. Heilemann G, Poppe B, Laub W. On the sensitivity of common gamma-index evaluation methods to MLC misalignments in Rapidarc quality assurance. Med Phys. 2013;40:031702. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4789580
  20. Fredh A, Scherman JB, Fog LS, Munck af Rosenschold P. Patient QA systems for rotational radiation therapy: a comparative experimental study with intentional errors. Med Phys. 2013;40:031716. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4788645