Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Wear of contemporary dental composite resin restorations: a literature review

  • Dimitrios Dionysopoulos (Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) ;
  • Olga Gerasimidou (Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
  • Received : 2020.07.28
  • Accepted : 2020.10.10
  • Published : 2021.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Composite resins are the most commonly used dental restorative materials after minimally invasive dental procedures, and they offer an aesthetically pleasing appearance. An ideal composite restorative material should have wear properties similar to those of tooth tissues. Wear refers to the damaging, gradual loss or deformation of a material at solid surfaces. Depending on the mechanism of action, wear can be categorized as abrasive, adhesive, fatigue, or corrosive. Currently used composite resins cover a wide range of materials with diverse properties, offering dental clinicians multiple choices for anterior and posterior teeth. In order to improve the mechanical properties and the resistance to wear of composite materials, many types of monomers, silane coupling agents, and reinforcing fillers have been developed. Since resistance to wear is an important factor in determining the clinical success of composite resins, the purpose of this literature review was to define what constitutes wear. The discussion focuses on factors that contribute to the extent of wear as well as to the prevention of wear. Finally, the behavior of various types of existing composite materials such as nanohybrid, flowable, and computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing materials, was investigated, along with the factors that may cause or contribute to their wear.

Keywords

References

  1. Gwon B, Bae EB, Lee JJ, Cho WT, Bae HY, Choi JW, Huh JB. Wear characteristics of dental ceramic CAD/CAM materials opposing various dental composite resins. Materials (Basel) 2019;12:1839.
  2. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 1989;68:1752-1754. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680120601
  3. Ferracane JL. Resin composite--State of the art. Dent Mater 2011;27:29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020
  4. Burke FJ. Amalgam to tooth-coloured materials--implications for clinical practice and dental education: governmental restrictions and amalgam-usage survey results. J Dent 2004;32:343-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.003
  5. Kakaboura A, Vougiouklakis G. Basic principles of operative dentistry. Athens: Paschalidis; 2012. 
  6. de Gee AJ, Wendt SL, Werner A, Davidson CL. Influence of enzymes and plaque acids on in vitro wear of dental composites. Biomaterials 1996;17:1327-1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)88679-0
  7. Turssi CP, De Moraes Purquerio B, Serra MC. Wear of dental resin composites: insights into underlying processes and assessment methods--a review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003;65:280-285.
  8. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Fischer NG, Nojiri K, Nagura Y, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miazaki M. Wear of resin composites: current insights into underlying mechanisms, evaluation methods and influential factors. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2018;54:76-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2017.11.002
  9. Ferracane JL. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices? Dent Mater 2006;22:689-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.005
  10. Heintze SD, Ilie N, Hickel R, Reis A, Loguercio A, Rousson V. Laboratory mechanical parameters of composite resins and their relation to fractures and wear in clinical trials-A systematic review. Dent Mater 2017;33:e101-e114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.013
  11. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:407-431.
  12. McCabe JF, Molyvda S, Rolland SL, Rusby S, Carrick TE. Two-and three-body wear of dental restorative materials. Int Dent J 2002;52:406-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2002.tb00730.x
  13. Popov VL. Is tribology approaching its golden age? Grand challenges in engineering education and tribological research. Front Mech Eng 2018;4:16.
  14. Blau PJ, Bayer RG. Wear of materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2003. 
  15. Yang LJ. Wear coefficient equation for aluminium-based matrix composites against steel disc. Wear 2003;255:579-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00191-1
  16. Nihei T, Dabanoglu A, Teranaka T, Kurata S, Ohashi K, Kondo Y, Yoshino N, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Three-body-wear resistance of the experimental composites containing filler treated with hydrophobic silane coupling agents. Dent Mater 2008;24:760-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.09.001
  17. Ghazal M, Kern M. Wear of human enamel and nano-filled composite resin denture teeth under different loading forces. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:58-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01904.x
  18. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Serra MC. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures. Dent Mater 2005;21:641-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.011
  19. de Paula AB, Fucio SB, Ambrosano GM, Alonso RC, Sardi JC, Puppin-Rontani RM. Biodegradation and abrasive wear of nano restorative materials. Oper Dent 2011;36:670-677. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-221-L
  20. Mair LH, Stolarski TA, Vowles RW, Lloyd CH. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop. J Dent 1996;24:141-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00043-7
  21. American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard terminology relating to wear and erosion. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. Vol 03.02. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1987. p243-250. 
  22. Ferracane JL. Materials in dentistry: principle and application. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. 
  23. ASM Handbook Committee. ASM handbook. Volume 18: Friction, lubrication and wear technology. Almere: ASM International; 2002. 
  24. ISO 9352: Plastics-Determination of resistance to wear by abrasive wheels. Geneve: International Organization for Standardization; 2012. 
  25. ASTM D4060: Standard test method for abrasion resistance of organic coatings by the taber abraser. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials; 2019. 
  26. Cavalcante LM, Masouras K, Watts DC, Pimenta LA, Silikas N. Effect of nanofillers' size on surface properties after toothbrush abrasion. Am J Dent 2009;22:60-64.
  27. Han JM, Zhang H, Choe HS, Lin H, Zheng G, Hong G. Abrasive wear and surface roughness of contemporary dental composite resin. Dent Mater J 2014;33:725-732. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-339
  28. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials 2005;26:4932-4937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.026
  29. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000;16:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00082-2
  30. Krejci I, Albert P, Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. J Dent Res 1999;78:713-719. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780021201
  31. Stachowiak GW, Batchelor AW. Engineering tribology. Burlington: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005. 
  32. Yap AU, Teoh SH, Hastings GW, Lu CS. Comparative wear ranking of dental restorative materials utilizing different wear simulation modes. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:574-580. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00528.x
  33. Mandel ID. The functions of saliva. J Dent Res 1987;66 Spec No:623-627. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660S103
  34. Mair LH. Subsurface compression fatigue in seven dental composites. Dent Mater 1994;10:111-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90050-7
  35. McCabe JF, Wang Y, Braem M. Surface contact fatigue and flexural fatigue of dental restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;50:375-380. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(20000605)50:3<375::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-R
  36. Soderholm KJ, Richards ND. Wear resistance of composites: a solved problem? Gen Dent 1998;46:256-263.
  37. Ilie N, Hickel R. Resin composite restorative materials. Aust Dent J 2011;56(Supplement 1):59-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01296.x
  38. Finlay N, Hahnel S, Dowling AH, Fleming GJ. The in vitro wear behavior of experimental resin-based composites derived from a commercial formulation. Dent Mater 2013;29:365-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.12.005
  39. Barkmeier WW, Erickson RI, Latta MA, Wilwerding TM. Wear rates of resin composites. Oper Dent 2013;38:226-233. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-112-L
  40. Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Erickson RL, Tsujimoto A, Latta M, Miyazaki M. Localized and generalized simulated wear of resin composites. Oper Dent 2015;40:322-335. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-155-L
  41. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1382-1390. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0054
  42. Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Estimation of the surface gloss of dental nano composites as a function of color measuring geometry. Am J Dent 2012;25:220-226.
  43. Sideridou ID, Karabela MM, Vouvoudi EC. Physical properties of current dental nanohybrid and nanofill light-cured resin composites. Dent Mater 2011;27:598-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.02.015
  44. Ilie N, Rencz A, Hickel R. Investigations towards nano-hybrid resin-based composites. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:185-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0689-1
  45. Hahnel S, Schultz S, Trempler C, Ach B, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Two-body wear of dental restorative materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011;4:237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.06.001
  46. Oliveira GU, Mondelli RF, Charantola Rodrigues M, Franco EB, Ishikiriama SK, Wang L. Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated toothbrushing. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:510-516. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000500003
  47. Takahashi H, Finger WJ, Endo T, Kanehira M, Koottathape N, Komatsu M, Balkenhol M. Comparative evaluation of mechanical characteristics of nanofiller containing resin composites. Am J Dent 2011;24:264-270.
  48. Seemann R, Pfefferkorn F, Hickel R. Behaviour of general dental practitioners in Germany regarding posterior restorations with flowable composites. Int Dent J 2011;61:252-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00068.x
  49. Lawson NC, Radhakrishnan R, Givan DA, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. Two-year randomized, controlled clinical trial of a flowable and conventional composite in class I restorations. Oper Dent 2015;40:594-602. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-038-C
  50. Sumino N, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Shiratsuchi K, Miyazaki M, Latta MA. Comparison of the wear and flexural characteristics of flowable resin composites for posterior lesions. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71:820-827. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.734405
  51. Shinkai K, Taira Y, Suzuki S, Suzuki M. In vitro wear of flowable resin composite for posterior restorations. Dent Mater J 2016;35:37-44. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-080
  52. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Mechanical properties, volumetric shrinkage and depth of cure of short fiber-reinforced resin composite. Dent Mater J 2016;35:418-424. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-280
  53. Dionysopoulos D, Tolidis K, Gerasimou P. Polymerization efficiency of bulk-fill dental resin composites with different curing modes. J Appl Polym Sci 2016;133:43392.
  54. Magno MB, Nascimento GC, Rocha YS, Ribeiro BD, Loretto SC, Maia LC. Silorane-based composite resin restorations are not better than conventional composites - a meta-analysis of clinical studies. J Adhes Dent 2016;18:375-386.
  55. Torres C, Augusto MG, Mathias-Santamaria IF, Di Nicolo R, Borges AB. Pure ormocer vs methacrylate composites on posterior teeth: a double-blinded randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 2020;45:359-367. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-079-C
  56. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication. Dent Mater 2015;31:e77-e87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.016
  57. Tanoue N, Murakami M, Koizumi H, Atsuta M, Matsumura H. Depth of cure and hardness of an indirect composite polymerized with three laboratory curing units. J Oral Sci 2007;49:25-29. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.49.25
  58. Yamamoto T, Nakamura Y, Nishide A, Kubota Y, Momoi Y. Contraction stresses in direct and indirect composite restorations compared by crack analysis. J Adhes Dent 2013;15:47-54.
  59. Hirata M, Koizumi H, Tanoue N, Ogino T, Murakami M, Matsumura H. Influence of laboratory light sources on the wear characteristics of indirect composites. Dent Mater J 2011;30:127-135. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2010-043
  60. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. Dent Mater 1992;8:290-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90102-I
  61. Angeletaki F, Gkogkos A, Papazoglou E, Kloukos D. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2016;53:12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.011
  62. da Veiga AM, Cunha AC, Ferreira DM, da Silva Fidalgo TK, Chianca TK, Reis KR, Maia LC. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2016;54:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.003
  63. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:386-395. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114267
  64. Furuichi T, Takamizawa T, Tsujimoto A, Miyazaki M, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. Mechanical properties and sliding-impact wear resistance of self-adhesive resin cements. Oper Dent 2016;41:E83-E92. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-033-L
  65. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Watanabe H, Johnson WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Simulated localized wear of resin luting cements for universal adhesive systems with different curing mode. J Oral Sci 2018;60:29-36. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.16-0815
  66. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Berry TP, Tsujimoto A, Miyazaki M. Simulated wear of self-adhesive resin cements. Oper Dent 2016;41:327-338. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-227-L
  67. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miayazaki M. Relationship between simulated gap wear and generalized wear of resin luting cements. Oper Dent 2017;42:E148-E158. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-270-L
  68. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust Dent J 2011;56(Supplement 1):97-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01300.x
  69. Yoshida F, Tsujimoto A, Ishii R, Nojiri K, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M, Latta MA. Influence of surface treatment of contaminated lithium disilicate and leucite glass ceramics on surface free energy and bond strength of universal adhesives. Dent Mater J 2015;34:855-862. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-123
  70. Komurcuoglu MB, Sagirkaya E, Tulga A. Influence of different surface treatments on bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:439-446. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.439
  71. Alamoush RA, Silikas N, Salim N, Al-Nasrawi S, Satterthwaite JD. Effect of the composition of CAD/CAM composite blocks on mechanical properties. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:4893143.
  72. Papadopoulos C, Dionysopoulos D, Tolidis K, Kouros P, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Tsitrou EA. Structural integrity evaluation of large MOD restorations fabricated with a bulk-fill and a CAD-CAM resin composite material. Oper Dent 2019;44:312-321. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-013-L
  73. Magne P, Dietschi D, Holz J. Esthetic restorations for posterior teeth: practical and clinical considerations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:104-119.
  74. Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent 2013;38:618-625. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-395-L
  75. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:375-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00013-0
  76. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014;93:1232-1234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514553976
  77. Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater 2016;32:e275-e283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.222
  78. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, Iwasaki N, Asakawa Y, Oki M, Finger WJ, Arksornnukit M. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 2014;33:705-710. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-208
  79. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of thermal cycling on flexural properties and simulated wear of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing resin composites. Oper Dent 2017;42:101-110. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-046-L
  80. Papadopoulos K, Pahinis K, Saltidou K, Dionysopoulos D, Tsitrou E. Evaluation of the surface characteristics of dental CAD/CAM materials after different surface treatments. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:981.
  81. Dionysopoulos D. Smart materials in dentistry. Stoma (Thessaloniki) 2016;44:83-92. 
  82. Althaqafi KA, Satterthwaite J, Silikas N. A review and current state of autonomic self-healing microcapsules-based dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2020;36:329-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.12.005