DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a radiological emergency evacuation model using agent-based modeling

  • Received : 2020.06.12
  • Accepted : 2021.01.05
  • Published : 2021.07.25

Abstract

In order to mitigate the damage caused by accidents in nuclear power plants (NPPs), evacuation strategies are usually managed on the basis of off-site effects such as the diffusion of radioactive materials and evacuee traffic simulations. However, the interactive behavior between evacuees and the accident environment has a significant effect on the consequential gap. Agent-based modeling (ABM) is a method that can control and observe such interactions by establishing agents (i.e., the evacuees) and patches (i.e., the accident environments). In this paper, a radiological emergency evacuation model is constructed to realistically check the effectiveness of an evacuation strategy using NetLogo, an ABM toolbox. Geographic layers such as radiation sources, roads, buildings, and shelters were downloaded from an official geographic information system (GIS) of Korea, and were modified into respective patches. The dispersion model adopted from the puff equation was also modified to fit the patches on the geographic layer. The evacuees were defined as vehicle agents and a traffic model was implemented by combining the shortest path search (determined by an A * algorithm) and a traffic flow model incorporated in the Nagel-Schreckenberg cellular automata model. To evaluate the radiological harm to the evacuees due to the spread of radioactive materials, a simple exposure model was established to calculate the overlap fraction between the agents and the dispersion patches. This paper aims to demonstrate that the potential of ABM can handle disaster evacuation strategies more realistically than previous approaches.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation of Nuclear Safety (KOFONS), using a financial resource granted by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission of the Republic of Korea (No. 1705001 and No. 1803008).

References

  1. U.S. NRC, Criteria for Development for Evacuation Time Estimate Studies, NUREG/CR-7002, 2011.
  2. IAEA, Arrangements for Preparedness for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, IAEA GS-G-2.1, 2007.
  3. Act on Physical Protection and Radiological Emergency, Article 20-2 (Establishment, Etc. Of Radiation Emergency Planning Zones), No.15280, 2017.
  4. U.S. NRC, Code Manual for MACCS2, vol. 6613, NUREG/CR-, 1998.
  5. U.S. NRC, MACCS Best Practices as Applied in the State-Of-The-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) Project, NUREG/CR-7009, 2014.
  6. S. Yu, GIS and agent-based modeling of emergency evacuation, Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation 12 (1) (2012) 127-132. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2012.12.1.127
  7. M. Hori, Introduction to Computational Earthquake Engineering, Imperial College Press, 2011.
  8. R. Dawson, R. Peppe, W. Miao, An Agent-Based Model for Risk-Based Flood Incident Management, Nat. Hazards vol. 59 (2011) 167-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9745-4
  9. H. Li, W. Tang, D. Simpson, Behaviour Based Motion Simulation for Fire Evacuation Procedures, 2004.
  10. Nidhi Parikh, et al., A comparison of multiple behavior models in a simulation of the aftermath of an improvised nuclear detonation, Aut. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 30 (Issue 6) (2016) 1148-1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-016-9331-y
  11. C. Barrett, K. Bisset, et al., Planning and response in the aftermath of a large crisis: an agent-based informatics framework, in: Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference - Simulation: Making Decisions in a Complex World, WSC, 2013, pp. 1515-1526, 2013.
  12. K. Weinisch, P. Brueckner, The impact of shadow evacuation on evacuation time estimates for nuclear power plants, Journal of Emergency Management 13(2), 2016.
  13. Xiaoyu Hu, Study of Evacuation Time Estimates of Nuclear Power Plant Sites, 2011.
  14. J. Lee, et al., The estimated evacuation time for the emergency planning Zone of the kori nuclear site, with a focus on the precautionary action Zone, Journal of Radiation Protection and Research 41 (3) (2016) 196-205. https://doi.org/10.14407/jrpr.2016.41.3.196
  15. U.S. NRC, Criteria for preparation and evaluation of radiological emergency response plans and preparedness in support of nuclear power plants, NUREG-0654/FEMA-rep-1, Rev. 2 (2019).
  16. S. Kim, E. Lee, Estimating of Evacuation Time for Emergency Planning Zone of Uljin Nuclear Power Plants, 2004.
  17. U. Wilensky, An Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling : Modeling Natural, Social, and Engineered Complex Systems with NetLogo, MitPr, 1955.
  18. Swarm Development Group. http://www.swarm.org.
  19. MASON. http://mason.gmu.edu.
  20. Repast Suite. http://Repast.sourceforge.net.
  21. Netlogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo.
  22. Qgis Development, Qgis User Guide, Samurai Media Limited, 2016.
  23. Korea Highway Capacity Manual (KHCM), KORST (2001).
  24. National Geographic Information Institute (NGII). https://www.ngii.go.kr.
  25. S. Hong, T. Koh, Application of Evacuation Model for Coastal Inundation, Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 2009, pp. 154.1-15154, 1.
  26. R. Dechter, J. Pearl, Generalized best-first search strategies and the optimality of A*, J. ACM 32 (2002) 505-536. https://doi.org/10.1145/3828.3830
  27. P.E. Hart, et al., A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern. 4 (2) (1968) 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSC.1968.300136
  28. D. Chowdhury, L. Santen, A. Schadschneider, Statistical physics of vehicular traffic and some related systems, Phys. Rep. 329 (2000) 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00117-9
  29. S. Wolfram, Theory and Applications of Cellular Automata, World Scientific, 1986.
  30. K. Nagel, M. Schreckenberg, A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic, J. Phys. 2 (1992) 2221.
  31. R. Barlovic, L. Santen, A. Schadschneider, M. Schreckenberg, Metastable states in cellular automata for traffic flow, Eur. Phys. J. B 5 (1998) 793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100510050504
  32. Yeonggwang-Gun. http://www.yeonggwang.go.kr.
  33. Google Map. https://www.google.com/maps.
  34. D. Crowl, J. Louvar, Chemical Process Safety : Fundamentals with Applications, Prentice Hall, 2002.
  35. Korea Meteorological Administration. https://www.kma.go.kr.
  36. W.B. Mann, A. Rytz, A. Spernol, Radioactivity Measurements: Principles and Practice, Elsevier, 2012.
  37. U.S. NRC, Accident source terms for light-water nuclear power plants, NUREG/ CR (United States. Nucl. Regul. Comm.) 1465 (1995).
  38. ICRP, The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, vol. 103, ICRP Publication, 2007.