DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of TREND dynamics code for molten salt reactors

  • Yu, Wen (Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Ruan, Jian (Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • He, Long (Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Kendrick, James (Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California) ;
  • Zou, Yang (Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Xu, Hongjie (Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
  • Received : 2019.09.21
  • Accepted : 2020.07.22
  • Published : 2021.02.25

Abstract

The Molten Salt Reactor (MSR), one of the six advanced reactor types of the 4th generation nuclear energy systems, has many impressive features including economic advantages, inherent safety and nuclear non-proliferation. This paper introduces a system analysis code named TREND, which is developed and used for the steady and transient simulation of MSRs. The TREND code calculates the distributions of pressure, velocity and temperature of single-phase flows by solving the conservation equations of mass, momentum and energy, along with a fluid state equation. Heat structures coupled with the fluid dynamics model is sufficient to meet the demands of modeling MSR system-level thermal-hydraulics. The core power is based on the point reactor neutron kinetics model calculated by the typical Runge-Kutta method. An incremental PID controller is inserted to adjust the operation behaviors. The verification and validation of the TREND code have been carried out in two aspects: detailed code-to-code comparison with established thermal-hydraulic system codes such as RELAP5, and validation with the experimental data from MSRE and the CIET facility (the University of California, Berkeley's Compact Integral Effects Test facility).The results indicate that TREND can be used in analyzing the transient behaviors of MSRs and will be improved by validating with more experimental results with the support of SINAP.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study is supported by the Chinese TMSR Strategic Pioneer Science and Technology Project (No.XDA02010000), the Frontier Science Key Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.QYZDYSSW-JSC016).

References

  1. M.W. Rosenthal, P.R. Kasten, R.B. Briggs, Molten-salt reactors-pistory, states, and potential, Nucl. App. Technol. 8 (1970) 107-117. https://doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28619
  2. C. Forsberg, The advanced high-temperature reactor: high-temperature fuel, liquid salt coolant, liquid-metal-reactor plant, Prog. Nucl. Energy 47 (2005) 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2005.05.002
  3. J. Serp, M. Allibert, The molten salt reactor (MSR) in generation IV: overview and perspectives, Prog. Nucl. Energy 77 (2014) 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.02.014
  4. M.H. Jiang, H.J. Xu, Z.M. Dai, Advanced fission energy program-TMSR nuclear energy system, Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 3 (2012) 366-374 (In Chinese).
  5. J. Krepel, U. Grundmann, et al., DYN1D-MSR dynamics code for molten salt reactors, Ann. Nucl. Energy 32 (2005) 1799-1824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2005.07.007
  6. J. Krepel, U. Grundmann, et al., DYN3D-MSR spatial dynamics code for molten salt reactors, Ann. Nucl. Energy 34 (2007) 449-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2006.12.011
  7. M. Zanetti, A. Cammi, A. Luzzi, et al., Extension of the FAST code system for the modelling and simulation of MSR dynamics, in: International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants, May 03-06, 2015. Nice, France.
  8. C. Tripodo, A.D. Ronco, S. Lorenzi, Development of a control-oriented power plant simulator for the molten salt fast reactor, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 5 (2019) 13.
  9. M.S. Greenwood, B.R. Betzler, et al., Demonstration of the advanced dynamic system modeling tool transform in a molten salt reactor application via a model of the molten salt hemonstration reactor, Nucl. Technol. 206 (2019) 1-27.
  10. J. Ruan, Y. Zou, et al., Fluoride-salt cooled higlrtemperature reactor hardwareirrthe-loop simulation and preliminary test, Atom. Energy Sci. Technol. 52 (2018) 659-665 (In Chinese).
  11. S. Patankar, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, first ed., Taylor & Francis, Oxford, 1980.
  12. H. Francis Harlow, J.E. Welch, Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with free surface, Phys. Fluids 8 (1965) 2182. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1761178
  13. N.E. Todreas, M.S. Kazimi, Nuclear Systems I Thermal Hydraulic Fundamentals, first ed., Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York, 1990.
  14. S.J. Ball, T.W. Kerlin, Stability Analysis of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1965. ORNL-TM-1070.
  15. F. Allan Henry, Scott, Nuclear Reactor Analysis, first ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1976.
  16. F. Blanchon, T. Ha-Duong, J. Planchard, Numerical methods for solving the reactor kinetic equations, Prog. Nucl. Energy 22 (1988) 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-1970(88)90008-X
  17. E. Virgil Schrock, A revised ANS Standard for decay heat from fission products, Nucl. Technol. 46 (1979) 323-331. https://doi.org/10.13182/NT79-A32334
  18. K.J. Astrom, T. Hagglund, PID Controllers : Theory, Design and Tuning, first ed., Instrument Society of America, New York, 1995.
  19. L. Kendrick Huddar, Application of frequency response methods in separate and integral effects tests for molten salt cooled and fueled reactors, Nucl. Eng. Des. 329 (2018) 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.11.045
  20. N. Zweibaum, J.E. Bickel, Design, Fabrication and Startup Testing of the Compact Integral Effects Test Facility in Support of Fluoride-Salt-Cooled, High Temperature Reactor Technology, in: International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, 2015. Chicago, August 30-September 4.
  21. P.N. Haubenreich, Molten-salt Reactor Experiments, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1969. ORNL-4344.
  22. R.C. Robertson, MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part I-Description of Reactor Design, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1965. ORNL-TM-278.
  23. M. Delpech, S. Dulla, C. Garzenne, Benchmark of dynamic simulation tools for molten salt reactors, in: Proceedings of the International Conference GLOBAL, New Orleans, LA, 2003.
  24. B.E. Prince, J.R. Engel, S.J. Ball, Zero-power Physical Experiments on Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1968. ORNL-4233.
  25. G.J. Auwerda, D. Lathouwers, Computational modeling of a molten salt Reactor, ResearchGate (2007). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242184604.
  26. J. Cai, X.B. Xia, Analysis on reactivity initiated transient from control rod failure events of a molten salt reactor, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 25 (2014) 78-82. https://doi.org/10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.25.050601
  27. C.B. Shi, M.S. Cheng, G.M. Liu, Development and application of a system analysis code for liquid fueled molten salt reactors based on RELAP5 code, Nucl. Eng. Des. 305 (2016) 378-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.05.034