DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fault Classification of a Blade Pitch System in a Floating Wind Turbine Based on a Recurrent Neural Network

  • Cho, Seongpil (Alternative Fuels and Power System Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering) ;
  • Park, Jongseo (Division of Naval Architecture and Ocean Systems Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Choi, Minjoo (Division of Naval Architecture and Ocean Systems Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
  • Received : 2021.04.07
  • Accepted : 2021.06.08
  • Published : 2021.08.31

Abstract

This paper describes a recurrent neural network (RNN) for the fault classification of a blade pitch system of a spar-type floating wind turbine. An artificial neural network (ANN) can effectively recognize multiple faults of a system and build a training model with training data for decision-making. The ANN comprises an encoder and a decoder. The encoder uses a gated recurrent unit, which is a recurrent neural network, for dimensionality reduction of the input data. The decoder uses a multilayer perceptron (MLP) for diagnosis decision-making. To create data, we use a wind turbine simulator that enables fully coupled nonlinear time-domain numerical simulations of offshore wind turbines considering six fault types including biases and fixed outputs in pitch sensors and excessive friction, slit lock, incorrect voltage, and short circuits in actuators. The input data are time-series data collected by two sensors and two control inputs under the condition that of one fault of the six types occurs. A gated recurrent unit (GRU) that is one of the RNNs classifies the suggested faults of the blade pitch system. The performance of fault classification based on the gate recurrent unit is evaluated by a test procedure, and the results indicate that the proposed scheme works effectively. The proposed ANN shows a 1.4% improvement in its performance compared to an MLP-based approach.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by "The development of a fully electrified car ferry and a removable power supply system (Project No. 20200469-01, PMS4700) funded by a national R&D project of the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries. The authors gratefully would like to express our sincere gratitude for the research fund granted.

References

  1. Bach-Andersen, M., Romer-Odgaard, B., & Winther, O., (2015). Scalable Systems for Early Fault Detection in Wind Turbines: A Data Driven Approach. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the European Wind Energy Association, Paris, France.
  2. Bach-Andersen, M., Romer-Odgaard, B., & Winther, O. (2018) Deep Learning for Automated Drivetrain Fault Detection. Wind Energy, 21(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2142
  3. Badihi, H., Zhang, Y., & Hong, H. (2014). Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Torque Load Control Against Actuator Faults. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 23(4), 1351-1372. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2014.2364956
  4. Blanke, M., Kinnaert, M., Lunze, J., Staroswiecki, M., & Schroder, J. (2006). Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control (2nd ed.). Germany: Springer.
  5. Carroll, J., McDonald, A., & McMillan, D. (2016). Failure Rate, Repair Time and Unscheduled O&M Cost Analysis of Offshore Wind Turbines. Wind Energy, 19, 1107-1119. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1887
  6. Cho, K.H., Merrienboer, B.V., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Doha, Qatar, 1724-1734. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1179
  7. Cho, S., Gao, Z., & Moan, T. (2018). Model-based Fault Detection, Fault Isolation and Fault-tolerant Control of a Blade Pitch System in Floating Wind Turbines. Renewable Energy, 120, 306-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.102
  8. Cho, S., Bachynski, E.E., Nejad, A.R., Gao, Z., & Moan, T. (2020). Numerical Modeling of Hydraulic Blade Pitch Actuator in a Spar-type Floating Wind Turbine Considering Fault Conditions and Their Effects on Global Dynamic Responses. Wind Energy, 23(2), 370-390. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2438
  9. Cho, S., Choi, M.J., Gao, Z., & Moan, T. (2021). Fault Detection and Diagnosis of a Blade Pitch System in a Floating Wind Turbine Based on Kalman Filters and Artificial Neural Networks. Renewable Energy, 169, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.116
  10. Dervilis, N., Choi, M., Taylor, S.G., Barthorpe, R.J., Park, G., Farrar, C.R., & Worden, K. (2014). On Damage Diagnosis for a Wind Turbine Blade Using Pattern Recognition. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 333(6), 1833-1850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.11.015
  11. Dinwoodie, I., McMillan, D., Revie, M., Lazakis, I., & Dalgic, Y. (2013). Development of a Combined Operational and Strategic Decision Support Model for Offshore Wind. Energy Procediam, 35, 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.169
  12. Gayo, J.B. (2011). Reliability-focused Research on Optimizing Wind Energy System Design, Operation and Maintenance: Tools, Proof of Concepts, Guidelines & Methodologies for a New Generation (FP7-Energy-2007-1-RTD). ReliaWind.
  13. Hasselmann, K., Barnett, T.P., Bouws, E., Carlson, H., Cartwright, D.E., Enke, K., ... Meerburg, A., (1973). Measurements of Wind-wave Growth and Swell Decay During the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP). Erganzungsheft zur Deutschen Hydrographischen Zeitschrift, Reihe A, 12.
  14. IEC (2005a). Wind Turbines - Part 1: Design Requirements (IEC 61400-1). International Electrotechnical Commission.
  15. IEC (2005b). Wind Turbines - Part 3: Design Requirements for Offshore Wind Turbines (IEC 61400-3). International Electrotechnical Commission.
  16. Isermann, R. (2006). Fault-Diagnosis Systems: An Introduction from Fault Detection to Fault Tolerance. Germany: Springer.
  17. Jiang, G., Xie, P., He, H., & Yan, J. (2017). Wind Turbine Fault Detection Using a Denoising Autoencoder with Temporal Information. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 23(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2017.2759301
  18. Johannessen K, Meling T.S., Haver S. (2002). Joint Distribution for Wind and Waves in the Northern North Sea. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 12(1), ISOPE02-12-1-001.
  19. Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W., & Scott, G. (2009). Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development (Technical Report NREL/TP500-38060). USA: National Renewable Energy Lab.
  20. Jonkman, J. (2010). Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3 Technical Report NREL/TP-500-47535 USA.
  21. Jonkman, J., & Kilcher, L. (2012). TurbSim User's Guide Technical Report NREL USA.
  22. Kusiak, A., & Li, W. (2011). The Prediction and Diagnosis of Wind Turbine Faults. Renewable Energy, 36(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.05.014
  23. Kusiak, A., & Verma, A. (2012). Analyzing Bearing Faults in Wind Turbines: A Data-mining Approach. Renewable Energy, 48, 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.04.020
  24. Laouti, N., Sheibat-Othman, N., & Othman, S. (2011). Support Vector Machines for Fault Detection in Wind Turbines. Proceedings of 18th IFAC World Congress, Milano, Italy, 44(1), 7067-7072. https://doi.org/10.3182/20110828-6-IT-1002.02560
  25. NordzeeWind. (2010). Operations Report 2009 (Technical Report OWEZ_R_000_20101112). NordzeeWind.
  26. Santos, P., Villa, L.F., Renones, A., Bustillo, A., & Maudes, J. (2015). An SVM-based Solution for Fault Detection in Wind Turbines. Sensors, 15(3), 5627-5648. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150305627
  27. SINTEF Ocean. (2018a). SIMO 4.15.0 User Guide.
  28. SINTEF Ocean. (2018b). RIFLEX 4.14.0 User Guide.
  29. Simani, S., Farsoni, S., & Castaldi, P. (2014). Fault Diagnosis of a Wind Turbine Benchmark via Identified Fuzzy Models. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(6), 3775-3782. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2014.2364548
  30. Wang, L., Zhang, Z., Long, H., Xu, J., & Liu, R. (2016). Wind Turbine Gearbox Failure Identification with Deep Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(3), 1360-1368. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2016.2607179
  31. Wason, R. (2018). Deep Learning: Evolution and Expansion. Cognitive Systems Research, 52, 701-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.08.023
  32. Zaher, A., McArthur, S.D.J., Infield, D.G., & Patel, Y. (2009). Online Wind Turbine Fault Detection Through Automated SCADA Data Analysis. Wind Energy, 12(6), 574-593. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.319
  33. Zeng, J., Lu, D., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Z., Qiao, W., & Gong, X. (2013). Wind Turbine Fault Detection and Isolation Using Support Vector Machine and a Residual-based Method. 2013 American Control Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 3661-3666. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2013.6580398