DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교도소 컨텍스트속에서 서비스 디자인 방법을 통한 지속가능 서비스 혁신에 관한 연구 - "Yu Fu Bao" 금융 서비스를 중심으로

A service design approach to sustainable service innovation in prison contexts - Taking the Service Design of "Yu Fu Bao" as an Example

  • 진섭 (국민대학교 테크노디자인전문대학원 경험디자인학과) ;
  • 반영환 (국민대학교 테크노디자인전문대학원 경험디자인학과)
  • Xie, Chen (Dept. of Experience Design, Graduate School of Techno Design, Kookmin University) ;
  • Pan, Younghwan (Dept. of Experience Design, Graduate School of Techno Design, Kookmin University)
  • 투고 : 2021.05.24
  • 심사 : 2021.08.20
  • 발행 : 2021.08.28

초록

중국은 최근 몇 년 사이 디지털기술을 활용하여 정부의 통치체계와 통치능력을 현대화하겠다는 결정을 내렸다. 스마트 감옥은 국가의 형벌 기관으로서 기술개혁은 스마트 감옥의 지속가능한 발전을 위한 관건이다. 기술에 의존한다고 해서 반드시 더 나은 서비스 경험을 가져다 줄 수는 없다. 서비스 디자인적 사고는 기술과 사회의 지속가능한 발전을 위하여 조율 역할을 하면서 스마트 감옥 건설의 기술융합에 새로운 서비스 디자인 사고를 적용하고 교도소 콘텍스트속의 서비스의 디자인 수요에 대응해야 한다. 그리하여 본문은 스마트 감옥의 12개 서브시스템 중 옥부보 금융서비스 시스템 개발을 중심으로 스마트 감옥의 지속가능한 서비스 구현을 위한 서비스 디자인 방법의 특징과 부족함을 탐구하고 이에 따라 감옥의 특수한 상황적 요구에 부합하는 경험에 기초하여 시너지를 유도하는 설계이념(EBLCD)을 제시했다. 이를 바탕으로 장래 스마트 감옥의 혁신 문화, 창의력 및 혁신 방법에 대한 심도 있는 연구를 통해 궁극적으로 스마트 감옥 건설의 프레임을 마련했다.

In recent years, China has gradually made clear its decision to modernize the governance system and governance capacity of the government by the virtue of digital transformation. As for the smart prison, as a penal institution of the state, technological reform is a key element in the sustainable development of smart prisons; however, relying on technology does not necessarily lead to a better service experience. Service design concept, as a coordinator of technology and social sustainability, needs to be adapted to the technological integration of smart prisons and to the needs for service design in the prison context in a new mode of thinking about services. This paper takes the development of the Jail Pay financial services system, one of the twelve sub-systems of the Smart Prison, as an entry point to explore the characteristics and shortcomings of the service design approach in achieving sustainable service innovation in the Smart Prison, it proposes an experience-based lead collaborative design (EBLCD) that is suitable for the specific needs in the prison context. The EBLCD is a theoretical framework and practical experience for sustainable service innovation in the construction of smart prisons.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Yi Sheng Tong Xin Child Development Foundation. (2016. Reduce Crime and Recidivism to Make Society more Stable and Peaceful.Njytf.cn http://www.njytf.cn/nd.jsp?id=169&_ngc=-1&groupId=2.
  2. Q. Ma, X. Y. Zhang & Z. L. Li. (2006). Reform of the Prison System and Exploration of the Establishment of Service-oriented Prisons. Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers, 5(2), 63-65. DOI : 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5101.2006.02.022
  3. Karen Holtzblatt & Hugh Beyer. (2019). Contextual Interaction Design: Design for Life. Cambridge, Ma Morgan Kaufmann
  4. S. Victors & J. Z. Li. (2018). Seven Principles of Persuasive Design: Influencing User Choice by Design=Design for the Mind, Post & Telecom Press, Beijing. P.37.
  5. Bureau of Prisons of the Ministry of Justice. (1991). Revised Draft of Opinions on the Trial Implementation of Division of Custody, Charge and Education for Criminals. Ministry of Justice.
  6. General Office of the State Council. (1994). Prison Law of the People's Republic of China. www.gov.cn[Online]. Http://www.gov.cn/ziliao/flfg/2005-09/12/content_31186.html.
  7. N. Loucks. (2005). Contrasting Prisoners' Rights: A Comparative Examination of England and Germany. By Liora Lazarus. The British Journal of Criminology, 45(6), 999-1001. DOI : 10.1093/bjc/azi088.
  8. L. T. Jia, F. N. Jia & S. Z. Dong. (2011). Web Form Design. Posts &Telecom Press, Bei Jing: Ren Min You Dian Chu Ban She.
  9. D. A. Norman. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things. Massachusetts: Mit Press.
  10. Han & L Y. Zhang. (2014). The Laws of Simplicity. China Machine Press, Bei Jing: Ji Xie Gong Ye Chu Ban She.
  11. J. Vink, K. Koskela-Huotari, B. Tronvoll, B. Edvardsson, & K. Wetter-Edman. (2020). "Service Ecosystem Design: Propositions, Process Model, and Future Research Agenda." Journal of Service Research. 24(1), 1-19. DOI : 10.1177/1094670520952537.
  12. E. B. N. Sanders & P. J. Stappers. (2008). "Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design." CoDesign, 4(1), 5-18. DOI : 10.1080/15710880701875068
  13. P. Bate & G. Robert. (2007). Bringing User Experience to Healthcare Improvement: The Concepts, Methods and Practices of Experience-Based Design. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 20(5), 533-534. DOI : 10.1108/ijhcqa.2007.06220eae.001.
  14. M. Arvola, J. Blomkvist, S. Holmlid & G. Pezone. (2012). A Service Walkthrough in Astrid Lindgren's Footsteps. In Servdes-Service Design & Innovation Conference
  15. J. F. Dovidio, J. A. Piliavin, D. A. Schroeder & L. A. Penner. (2012). The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis Group.
  16. Mariampolski Hy. (1999). The Power of Ethnography. Market Research Society Journal, 41(1), 1-12. DOI : 10.1177/147078539904100105.
  17. J. Blomberg, M. Burrell & G. Guest. (2003). The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications. Choice Reviews Online, 40(8), 964-986. DOI : 10.5860/choice.40-4648.
  18. A. Kouadio, Brice, Y. Emery & O. Boukamel. (2020). Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-Creating for a Better Society. Policy Press." Management International, 24(4), 165. DOI : 10.7202/1074368ar
  19. Terrey Nina. (2013). Managing by Design: Enacted through Situated Networks. Design Management Journal, 8(1), 52-61. DOI : 10.1111/dmj.12003