Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology (한국동물생명공학회지)

The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology (한국동물생명공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of programmed cell death induction method on somatic cell development

  • Kim, Sang-Hwan (Institute of Genetic Engineering, Hankyong National University)
  • Received : 2021.08.14
  • Accepted : 2021.09.16
  • Published : 2021.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, to analyze whether artificial regulation of apoptosis in the development of somatic cells can affect the stable growth and development of cells, 20 alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (20α-HSD) and rapamycin were treated to induce apoptosis and autophagy in the both skin and muscle cells. Respectively, and 3-methyladenine was supplemented to inhibit cell death. Our results show that stimulation with rapamycin activated autophagy in both types of cells, but increased apoptosis more than autophagy in the case of skin cells. These results indicate that there was a difference in the expression of survival factors and cell development depending on the type of cell. In particular, in the expression of autophagy-related gene (MAP1LC3A) was higher than that of Casp-3, an apoptosis factor. Furthermore, cell development was the highest in all cell groups cultured by artificially inducing autophagy, however the lowest in the apoptosis-inhibited group. Especially, the noteworthy result of this study was that when apoptosis was induced using 20α-HSD, it was possible to induce apoptosis in both skin and muscle cells. Therefore, the main point of this study is that apoptosis induced during cell culture plays a pivotal role in cell remodeling.

Keywords

References

  1. Bergmann A and Steller H. 2010. Apoptosis, stem cells, and tissue regeneration. Sci. Signal. 3:re8. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.3145re8
  2. Choi KH, Lee DK, Oh JN, Kim SH, Lee M, Jeong J, Choe GC, Lee CK. 2020. Generation of neural progenitor cells from pig embryonic germ cells. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 35:42-49. https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.1.42
  3. De Pol A, Vaccina F, Forabosco A, Cavazzuti E, Marzona L. 1997. Apoptosis of germ cells during human prenatal oogenesis. Hum. Reprod. 12:2235-2241. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.10.2235
  4. Edinger AL and Thompson CB. 2004. Death by design: apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16:663-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2004.09.011
  5. Fabian D, Koppel J, Maddox-Hyttel P. 2005. Apoptotic processes during mammalian preimplantation development. Theriogenology 64:221-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.11.022
  6. Fengsrud M, Sneve ML, Overbye A, Seglen PO. 2004. Structural aspects of mammalian autophagy. In: Klionsky DJ (Ed.), Autophagy. Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, pp. 11-25.
  7. Galluzzi L, Maiuri MC, Vitale I, Zischka H, Castedo M, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. 2007. Cell death modalities: classification and pathophysiological implications. Cell Death Differ. 14:1237-1243. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4402148
  8. Kim SH, Hwang SY, Min KS, Yoon JT. 2013. Molecular cloning and expression analyses of porcine MAP1LC3A in the granulosa cells of normal and miniature pig. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 11:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-8
  9. Kim SH, Kim KL, Lee JH, Shin DH, Jung NH, Lee HJ, Yoon JT. 2018. Detection of matrix metalloproteinases patterns in bovine luteum cell during pregnancy. J. Emb. Trans. 33:61-68. https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2018.33.2.61
  10. Kim SH, Min KS, Kim NH, Yoon JT. 2012. Differential expression of programmed cell death on the follicular development in normal and miniature pig ovary. PLoS One 7:e46194. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046194
  11. Kim SH, Shin YS, Kang MH, Yoon JT, Min KS. 2017. Gene expression and localization of 20α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD) in reproductive tissues during early pregnancy of cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 147:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.03.016
  12. Lee JY, Kim SH, Yoon JT. 2019. Identifying biomarkers of autophagy and apoptosis in transfected nuclear donor cells and transgenic cloned pig embryos. Ann. Anim. Sci. 19:127-146. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2018-0046
  13. Levine B and Klionsky DJ. 2004. Development by self-digestion: molecular mechanisms and biological functions of autophagy. Dev. Cell 6:463-6477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00099-1
  14. Park HB, Park YR, Lee HY, Bae HK, Lee S, Park CK, Yang BK, Cheong HT. 2017. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and apoptosis in parthenogenetic porcine embryos following different combination of activation methods. J. Emb. Trans. 32:25-31. https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2017.32.1.25
  15. Pattingre S, Tassa A, Qu X, Garuti R, Liang XH, Mizushima N, Packer M, Schneider MD, Levine B. 2005. Bcl-2 antiapoptotic proteins inhibit Beclin 1-dependent autophagy. Cell 122:927-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.002
  16. Tilly JL. 2001. Emerging technologies to control oocyte apoptosis are finally treading on fertile ground. ScientificWorldJournal 1:181-183. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.39
  17. Xie Z and Klionsky DJ. 2007. Autophagosome formation: core machinery and adaptations. Nat. Cell Biol. 9:1102-1109. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1007-1102
  18. Zeleznik AJ, Ihrig LL, Bassett SG. 1989. Developmental expression of Ca++/Mg++-dependent endonuclease activity in rat granulosa and luteal cells. Endocrinology 125:2218-2220. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-125-4-2218