Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Examining the PMIS Impacts on the Project Performance, User Satisfaction and Reuse Intention among the Project based Industries

프로젝트 성과, 사용자 만족도 및 재사용의도에 미치는 PMIS의 산업별 영향 비교

  • Park, So-Hyun (College of Business Administration, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Ayeon (Government Support Program Division, Naturetainer Corporation of Business) ;
  • Kim, Seung-Chul (School of Business, Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2021.09.08
  • Accepted : 2021.09.18
  • Published : 2021.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Project Management Information System (PMIS) is a special purpose information system that is created to provide useful information for project managers and participants to make effective and efficient decision making during projects. The use of PMIS is increasing in project based industries such as construction, defense, manufacturing, software development, telecommunication, etc. It is generally known that PMIS helps to improve the quality of decision making in project management, and consequently improves the project management performance. However, it is unclear what are the difference of PMIS impacts between industries, and still need to be studied further. The purpose of this study is to compare the impact of PMIS on project management performance between industries. We assume that the effects of PMIS will be different depending on the industry types. Five hypotheses are established and tested by using statistical methods. Data were collected by using a survey questionnaire from those people who had experience of using PMIS in various project related industries such as construction, defense, manufacturing, software development and telecommunication. The survey questionnaire consists of 5 point scale items and were distributed through e-mails and google drive network. A total of 181 responses were collected, and 137 were used for analysis after excluding those responses with missing items. Statistical techniques such as factor analysis and multiple regression are used to analyze the data. Summarizing the results, it is found that the impacts of PMIS quality on the PM performance are different depending on the industry types where PMIS is used. System quality seems to be more important for improving the PM performance in construction industry while information quality seems more important for manufacturing industry. As for the ICT and R&D industries, PMIS seems to have relatively lesser impact compared to construction and manufacturing industries.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 한양대학교 교내연구지원사업으로 연구되었음(HY-201900000003476).

References

  1. Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., Rashid, N., Foziah, H., and Ghazali, P., Assessing the effects of service quality on customer satisfaction, Management Science Letters, 2019, Vol. 9, No.1, pp. 13-24.
  2. Baccarini, D., The logical framework method for defining project success, Project Management Journal, 1999, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289903000405
  3. Braglia, M. and M. Frosolini, M., An integrated approach to implement Project Management Information Systems within the Extended Enterprise, International Journal of Project Management, 2014, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.003
  4. Chang, M. K. and Kim, S. C., Research for Relationship between Project Management Maturity Model and Project Performance, Project Management Review, 2015, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 49-66.
  5. Cui, Y., Mou, J., Cohen, J., and Liu, Y., Understanding information system success model and valence framework in sellers' acceptance of cross border e commerce: a sequential multi method approach, Electronic Commerce Research, 2019, Vol. 19, pp.885-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-019-09331-0
  6. Davis, F. D., A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results [Doctoral dissertation], [Cambridge], MIT Sloan School of Management, MA, 1986.
  7. Davis, K., Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success, International Journal of Project Management, 2014, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.02.006
  8. DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R., Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research, 1992, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  9. DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R., The DeLone and McLean model of Information systems success: a ten-year update, Journal of Management Information System, 2003, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  10. DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R., Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships, European Journal of Information Systems, 2008, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 236-263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15
  11. Froese, T. M., The impact of emerging information technology on project management for construction, Automation in Construction, 2010, Vol. 19, pp. 531-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.004
  12. Jaafari, A. and Manivong, K., Towards a smart project management information system, International Journal of Project Management, 1998, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00037-9
  13. Jeyaraj, A., DeLone & McLean models of information system success: Critical meta-review and research directions, International Journal of Information Management, 2020, Vol. 54, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102139
  14. Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., and Carr, C. L., Measuring Information System Service Quality: SERVQUAL from the Other Side, MIS Quarterly, 2002, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 145-166. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132324
  15. Karim, A. J., Project Management Information Systems (PMIS) Factors: An Empirical Study of Their Impact on Project Management Decision Making (PMDM) Performance, Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT, 2011, Vol. 2, pp. 22-27.
  16. Kim, S.A., Jung, C. W., Kim, N. H., Choi, C. H., and Chin, S. Y., Development of Collaboration and Communication Platform based on Contents for an Efficient Task Management in Construction Project, Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2016, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 98-107. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2016.17.3.098
  17. Kim, S. C. and Yoon, W. H., Analyzing the Relationships between Project Management Capability and Project Performance, Logos Management Review, 2015, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 139-162.
  18. Ko, D. S., Park, S. H., and Kim, S. C., A Study on the Effect of Project Process Quality on Project Success: Focusing on SI(System Integration) Project, Journal of Information Technology Services, 2019, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 75-96. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2019.18.2.075
  19. Kwon, J. H., Lee, T. W., and Kim, S. C., Effect of the Consensus among Stakeholders on Project Performance in Construction Industry, J. Soc. Korea Ind. Syst. Eng., 2019, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 232-241. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2019.42.3.232
  20. Lee, C. C., Nagpal, P., Lim, H. S., Dutil, L., Lee, R. and Kim, Y., A Variation of the DeLone and McLean Model for Collaborative Commerce Services: A Structural Equation Model, Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 2020, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 81-102.
  21. Lee, S. K. and Yu, J. H., Assessment of ASP-PMIS Quality in Korea, KICEM Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, 2011, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 9-17. https://doi.org/10.6106/JCEPM.2011.1.3.009
  22. Lee, S. K. and Yu, J. H., Critical Success Factors for Project Management Information System in Construction, KICEM Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, 2011, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 25-30. https://doi.org/10.6106/JCEPM.2011.1.1.025
  23. Lee, S. K. and Yu, J. H., Success model of project management information system in construction, Automation in Construction, 2012, Vol. 25(May), pp 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.015
  24. Leyland F. P., Richard T. W., and Kavan, C. B., Service Quality: A Measure of Information Systems Effectiveness, MIS Quarterly, 1995, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 173-187. https://doi.org/10.2307/249687
  25. Liberatore, M. J. and Pollack-Johnson, B., Factors influencing the usage and selection of project management software, IEEE Transactions Engineering Management, 2003, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 164-74. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.810821
  26. Love, P. E. D. and Irani, Z., A project management quality cost information system for the construction industry, Information & Management, 2003, Vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 649-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00094-0
  27. Marangunic, N. and Granic, A., Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013, Universal Access in the Information Society, 2015, Vol. 14, pp. 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
  28. Michel, S., Michaud-Trevinal, A., and Cocula, F., Net Impacts in Front Office IS: a First Operationalization of Delone and McLean Model in the Banking Sector, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 2019, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 92-112.
  29. Muller, R. and Turner, J. R., The influence of project managers on project success criteria and project success by type of project, European Management Journal, 2007, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.06.003
  30. Parasuraman, A, Zeithaml, V., and Berry, L. L., SERVQUAL: A Multiple- Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality, Journal of Retailing, 1985, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 12-40.
  31. Park, S. H., Lee, T. W., and Kim, S. C., Investigating the Impacts of the Quality of Project Management Information System on Project Performance and User Satisfaction, J. Soc. Korea Ind. Syst. Engineering, 2018, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 50-60. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2018.41.3.050
  32. Petter, S., Delone, W., and McLean, E.R., Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationship, European Journal of Information Systems, 2008, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 236-263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15
  33. Petter, S., Delone, W., and McLean, E., R., Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Independent Variables, Journal of Management Information Systems, 2013, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 7-62. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290401
  34. Project Management Institute, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 5th ed., Newtown Square, PA, 2013.
  35. Raymond, L. and Bergeron, F., Project Management Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Their Impact on Project Managers and Project Success, International Journal of Project Management, 2008, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.06.002
  36. Raza, S. A., Umer, A., Qureshi, M. A., and Dahri, A. S., Internet banking service quality, e-customer satisfaction and loyalty: the modified e-SERVQUAL model, The TQM Journal, 2020, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 1443-1466. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-02-2020-0019
  37. Stewart, R. A., IT enhanced project information management in construction: Pathways to improved performance and strategic competitiveness, Automation in Construction, 2007, Vol. 16, pp. 511-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.09.001
  38. Sung, M. W., Kim, K. R., Lee, S. K., and Yu, J. H., Effect of PMIS Quality on Intention to Use and User Satisfaction, Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 2012, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 122-132. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2012.12.1.122
  39. Taylor, S. A. and Baker, T. L., An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers' purchase intentions, Journal of Retailing, 1994, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4359(94)90013-2
  40. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D., A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, 2000, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  41. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D., User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly, 2003, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  42. William, F. and Tjhin, V. U., The Evaluation of Enterprise Resource Planningapplication Using Information Systems Success Model, Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 2021, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 1-13.
  43. Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., and Dwivedi, Y. K., The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 2015, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 443-488 https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088
  44. Yu, A. G., Flett, P. D., and Bower, J. A., Developing a value-centered proposal for assessing project success, International Journal of Project Management, 2005, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 428-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.01.008
  45. Zwikael, O. and Smyrk, J., A general framework for gauging the performance of initiatives to enhance organizational value, British Journal of Management, 2012, Vol. 23, S1. pp. S6-S22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00823.x